Immunity Modification of Full Term Infants According to the Type of Feeding and Mode of Delivery

February 17, 2020 updated by: Heinz Italia SpA

This is a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, with parallel groups and reference group.

The aim of the study was to investigate the immunity of infant born from caesarian section and fed with formula milk containing fermented matrix a double and triple dosage compare the first part of the trial FERCT15 assuming a dose-effect relationship of the fermented matrix with immune response.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The microbiota plays an important role in modulating the development of the immune system, making decisive the interrelation that between nutrition, microbiota and immune cells to modulate long-term health outcomes.

The type of feeding, especially breastfeeding, and the type of delivery are factors that can contribute to the development of the microbiota. Specifically, the exclusive breastfeeding promotes the development of bifidobacteria that promotes protection against potential infections and the development of the immune system.

In recent years it was improved the biological effects of formula milk, that represent the substitutes of breast milk when this is not available or if there are contraindications to breastfeeding. Functional foods derived from fermentation of cow's milk with probiotic strains have been proposed for the prevention of infectious diseases of the child. Recently, in a monocentric double-blind prospective study, the efficacy of fermented cow's milk with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 was evaluated in the prevention of common winter infections in children aged between 12 and 48 months. In this study, children treated with fermented milk had a lower incidence of respiratory and gastrointestinal tract infections compared to the control group. This effect was associated with a significant stimulation of innate immunity (α- and β-defensin, LL-37) and acquired (secretory IgA) and to a modulation of composition and function of the intestinal microbiota characterized by a significant increase in strains producing butyric acid (Firmicutes phyla). The nutritional intervention was very well accepted by the children and no adverse events were observed.

From previous results emerged that in infants born by eutocic delivery fed with fermented formula milk, there is more valid response of innate and acquired immunity compare to controls. In infants born by cesarean section this response is less expressed. It is possible to suppose that this response is linked to a different microbiota.

Primary objectives of this study were:

to investigate the immunity of infant born from caesarian section and fed with formula milk containing fermented matrix a double and triple dosage compare the first part of the trial FERCT15 assuming a dose-effect relationship of the fermented matrix with immune response.

Secondary objective:

Value the tolerance in the two groups of infants fed with the two formulas in the study, with reference to the group of infants fed with breast milk.

Value the modifications of the intestinal microbiota in the 3 groups of infants fed with the 3 formulas in the study, with reference to the group of infants fed with breast milk.

Study design: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study with reference group.

Methods:

Evaluation of the anthropometric parameters (weight, length and cranial circumference) Evaluation of body composition by plethysmography Evaluation of the gastrointestinal tolerance of fermented formulated milk by means of data collection and diary delivery to the parents of the participants Evaluation of the safety of fermented formulated milk by recording adverse events Determination of faecal samples of antimicrobial peptides (defensins, catelecidines), IgA, microbiota and metabolome.

Infants will be enrolled at birth (within 7 days of life) upon acquisition of the informed consent of both parents.

At the time of enrollment, infants born by caesarian section who take breast milk due to the absence of breast milk will be randomized to receive up to the third month of age or a standard formula without fermented matrix (control group) or a formula milk containing fermented matrix at dosage of 4.6 g per 100g of powder (group fed with double dosage of fermented matrix compare to FERCT15) or formula milk containing fermented matrix at dosage 6.9 g per 100g of powder (group fed with triple dosage of fermented matrix compare trial FERCT15).

Enrollment will be carried out by promoting and supporting breastfeeding and, in the event of exclusive breastfeeding forecasts for at least the first 3 months of age, newborns will be included in the study as a reference group.

There are 3 medical visits to enrollment (V0), the first (V1) and the third month of life (V2).

During the visits the anthropometric parameters, the body composition, and the gastroenteric tolerance will be evaluated. A stool sample will also be collected at the three points of the life study to determine the anti-microbial peptides (catelecidine, alpha and beta defensin) and the secretory IgA, and perform the analysis of the microbiota and the metabolome.

Statistical analysis:

The sample size was determined considering the secretory IgA values obtained in the FERCT15 trial.

The fecal secretory IgA mean value was 78,3 ±34,37ug/g and of 43,86±30,44 ug/g of feces in the group fed with formula milk with fermented matrix (dosage of 2,3g/100g of powder) and with the standard formula respectively.

Assuming a 15% drop-out rate, 14 newborns per group must be recruited.

Criteria for the evaluation of variables:

The descriptive analyzes will be performed by calculating mean, median and standard deviations for the continuous variables and expressing the distribution of the frequencies for the discrete variables. The main analysis will resort to tests for independent samples, Student or Mann-Whitney tests according to the distribution of the outcome variables. To jointly analyze the trend in time from V0 to V2 of the outcome variables in the two groups, the one that received the fermented formulated milk and the one that received the standard formula, based on the type of delivery (spontaneous or cesarean) will be used regression models for repeated measurements (random effects models or GEE models).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 1 week (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Full term healthy infants
  • Gestational age from 37 to 41 weeks
  • Weight appropriate for gestational age (from 10th to 90th centile according to World Health Organization chart)
  • Human milk not available or not possible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Weight small for gestational age (< 10th centile) or large for gestational age (> 90th centile) according to World Health Organization chart
  • Congenital abnormalities, chromosomal, hearth, gastrointestinal, respiratory, neurological or metabolic disease.
  • Perinatal infections
  • Positive familiarity for milk proteins allergies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Infants born by CS-fed fermented formula at double dosage
Infants born by CS-fed formula milk with fermented matrix at dosage of 4,6 g per 100g of powder (group fed with double dosage of fermented matrix compare trial FERCT15)
Infants enrolled were fed either with formula milk with fermented matrix at double dosage or with formula milk with fermented matrix at triple dosage or with standard formula during the first 3 months of life. Breastfed infants were the reference group.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Infants born by CS-fed fermented formula at triple dosage
Infants born by CS-fed formula milk with fermented matrix at dosage of 6,9 g per 100g of powder (group fed with triple double dosage of fermented matrix compare trial FERCT15)
Infants enrolled were fed either with formula milk with fermented matrix at double dosage or with formula milk with fermented matrix at triple dosage or with standard formula during the first 3 months of life. Breastfed infants were the reference group.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Infants born by CS-fed standard formula
Infants born by CS-fed formula milk without fermented matrix
Infants enrolled were fed either with formula milk with fermented matrix at double dosage or with formula milk with fermented matrix at triple dosage or with standard formula during the first 3 months of life. Breastfed infants were the reference group.
OTHER: Infants born by CS-breastfed
Infants born by cesarean section fed with mother milk during were the reference group
reference group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Innate immunity at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life.
Time Frame: 0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life.
Fecal dosage of catelecidines, alfa and beta defensins and sIgA
0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gastrointestinal tolerance
Time Frame: 0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life
Gastrointestinal tolerance is evaluated by the use of a daily diary computed by the parents to record vomiting/gaseous colics/stool frequency.
0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life
Weight
Time Frame: 0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life.
weight (g)
0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life.
Body composition
Time Frame: Time Frame: 0-7 days of life and at 90 days of life.
Body composition assessment in term of fat mass and fat free mass by air displacement
Time Frame: 0-7 days of life and at 90 days of life.
Anthropometry
Time Frame: 0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life.
length and head circumference (cm)
0-7 days of life, at 30 days of life and at 90 days of life.
Microbiota
Time Frame: 0-7 days of life and at 90 days of life.
gut microbiota assessment
0-7 days of life and at 90 days of life.
Metabolomics
Time Frame: 0-7 days of life and at 90 days of life.
stool metabolomic analysis
0-7 days of life and at 90 days of life.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fabio Mosca, prof, NICU. Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FERCT15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data will not shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Innate Immunity

Subscribe