The Effect of Antihypertensive Drugs on Severity of Anaphylaxis and Side-effects During Venom Immunotherapy (EADOAS)

October 28, 2020 updated by: Medical University of Graz

There is an ongoing debate whether antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and/or angiotensin converting Enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors comprises a risk factor for more severe and more frequent side-effects during venom immunotherapy (VIT). In the literature, data are controversial and originate from case reports or statistically underpowered studies; the number of included patients was usually high but the proportion of patients on antihypertensive treatment was low ranging from 2-11%.

The study was conducted as a prospective, observational, European multicenter study. 1425 patients, aged from 35 to 85 years, with a history of an anaphylactic reaction due to bee or wasp stings, were included. The medical history was recorded as well as laboratory parameters and data of the VIT-updosing phase. One year after reaching the maintenance dose, possible side-effects during VIT as well as the outcome of field stings or sting challenges were documented.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1425

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8036
        • Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

33 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with a history of anaphylactic sting reaction

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of systemic sting reaction (≥ grade I according the classification by Ring and Messmer)
  • age 35 to 85 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • absolute contraindications for VIT
  • pretreatment with Omalizumab

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with a history of an anaphylactic sting reaction
At Visit 1, patients will be included after carefully reviewing all inclusion and exclusion criteria. All data concerning the index sting, laboratory parameters like immunoglobulin E (IgE) and tryptase levels and skin test results will be recorded as well as the concomitant diseases and medication. Visit 2 will be performed after VIT updosing is finished. At this Visit data concerning the immunotherapy - premedication, preparation, updosing protocol, the outcome of possible large, local reactions (LLR) and systemic reactions (SR) and changes in diseases and medication will be recorded. One year after reaching the maintenance dose, Visit 3 will be performed. At this Visit data concerning the maintenance phase like premedication and possible side effects will be recorded as well as the outcome of insect stings.
Patients receive insect venom immunotherapy. The frequency of systemic side-effects is recorded and compared between patients under antihypertensive treatment and patients not taking antihypertensive drugs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of Side Effects (=Systemic Reaction, SR) During Venom Immunotherapy (VIT)
Time Frame: after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether subjects under antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and/or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors show more side effects during VIT compared to subjects with no antihypertensive treatment.
after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Sting Reactions
Time Frame: duration of first visit (~1hour)
To evaluate whether subjects under antihypertensive treatment with beta-blockers and/or ACE-inhibitors have more severe sting reactions.
duration of first visit (~1hour)
Correlation of the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Diseases and/or Hypertension With the Risk for More Severe Systemic Sting Reactions.
Time Frame: duration of first visit (~1hour)
To correlate the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and/or hypertension with the risk for more severe systemic sting reactions.
duration of first visit (~1hour)
Association of Bee Venom With a Higher Frequency of Side-effects (=Systemic Reaction, SR).
Time Frame: after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour
To evaluate whether bee venom is associated with a higher frequency of side-effects.
after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour
Correlation of High Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) Levels to a Higher Frequency of Side-effects (=Systemic Reaction, SR).
Time Frame: after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour

To evaluate whether high specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels are correlated to a higher frequency of side-effects.

sIgE levels are expressed in kilo units/liter [kU/L].

after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour
Correlation of High Tryptase Levels to a Higher Frequency of Side-effects (=Systemic Reaction, SR).
Time Frame: after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour
To evaluate whether high tryptase levels are correlated to a higher frequency of side-effects
after finishing the updosing phase (duration up to 6 months depending on the updosing protocol chosen by the patient) of a patient's venom immunotherapy; duration of Visit ~1hour
Correlation of Quicker Up-dosing Protocols to a Higher Frequency of Side-effects (=Systemic Reaction, SR).
Time Frame: depends on the protocol used for venom immunotherapy, a maximum of about 6 months
To evaluate whether quicker up-dosing protocols are correlated to a higher frequency of side-effects.
depends on the protocol used for venom immunotherapy, a maximum of about 6 months
Efficacy of VIT
Time Frame: 1 year after reaching the maintenance dose; duration of Visit ~1hour
The outcome (systemic reaction to sting or not) of sting challenges and/or field stings will be recorded to identify patients who will not tolerate but react to future stings. These results will be compared between patients not taking antihypertensive (AHT) drugs and patients taking AHT drugs.
1 year after reaching the maintenance dose; duration of Visit ~1hour
Correlation of the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Diseases and/or Hypertension With the Risk for More Frequent Side Effects (=Systemic Reaction, SR) Under VIT.
Time Frame: duration of Visit ~1hour
To correlate the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and/or hypertension with the risk for more frequent side effects (=systemic reaction, SR) under VIT..
duration of Visit ~1hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 26-422 ex13/14 (EADOAS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hymenoptera Venom Allergy

Clinical Trials on Insect Venom

3
Subscribe