The Effect of Skill Centered Intervention Based on IMB Model on Promoting Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexuality Health. (IMB)

February 19, 2020 updated by: Tehran University of Medical Sciences

The Effect of Skill Centered Intervention Based on IMB Model on Promoting School Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexuality Health

Study aim is determining the impact of a skill based intervention based on IMB model on Promoting School Teachers' Professional Competence in Teaching Sexual Health.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This research is a randomized control field trial with two groups; intervention and control. Sampling will be conducted by block design (with block size of 4) random allocation.

Intervention group: Intervention group will be received sexuality teaching skills for promotion of professional competence based on information, motivation and behavioral skills model for adolescent sexuality after signing informed consent form and being informed about the goals and details of intervention for 6 sessions (one two hour session per week).

The control group will not receive any intervention until the end of the research. Then, based on the ethics of the research and their willingness can use the content of program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

27 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having instructors' consent to enter the study, instructor approval for teaching in terms of education system
  • Having at least 5 years of teaching experience.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not participating in at least a third of the sessions
  • Not willing to continue cooperation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Intervention group will be received sexuality teaching skills for promotion of professional competence based on information, motivation and behavioral skills model for adolescent sexuality after signing informed consent form and being informed about the goals and details of intervention for 6 sessions (one two hour session per week).
Behavioral: Educational intervention
Skill centered Protocol Training based on IMB model
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will not receive any intervention until the end of the research.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of mean difference score of professional competence.
Time Frame: Before intervention
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
Before intervention
Mean difference score
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
immediately after the intervention
Mean difference score
Time Frame: 6 weeks after the intervention
To assess the professional competence of the participants (i.e., knowledge, attitude, skills) by a self-report researcher-made questionnaire.Knowledge and Attitude domain Score from 17 to 85 and Skill Score from 16 to 80. We convert each domain to 0 -100 and report each domain separately and higher scores mean a better outcome
6 weeks after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Collaborators

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Raziyeh Maasoumi, Assistant, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 20, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1397.102

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

There is a plan to make this available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publishing the results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data of the study would be available after unrecognizable process of participants.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Performance

Clinical Trials on Educational intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Kazakhstan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe