Cognitive and Postural Activities of Prematurely Born Children (COGNIPOST)

August 16, 2024 updated by: Jean-Michel HASCOET, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Interdependency Between Cognitive and Postural Activities in Prematurely Born Children

Prematurely born children (PC) have academic difficulties related to poorer attention capabilities. Additionally, they often show excessive mobility, quoted as agitation. Some consider it could be related to poorer postural control and impaired perception of gravity vertical. But, this excessive mobility could also be an unconscious way for PC to improve their attention performance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the interdependence between postural and cognitive activities in school age PC versus term born children (TC). First, the performance of PC and TC at the Attention Network Test for Children will be analyzed with the use of a mobile versus a classic school chair. Secondly, participants will have to position a stick vertically to measure their perception of vertical gravity. Finally, the spontaneous postural activity of PC and TC (evaluated by the center of pressure displacement) will be studied during the execution of three different attention tasks at different levels of difficulty. Success rate and reaction time will be analyzed for all attention tasks. Moreover, center of pressure displacement calculation will allow evaluation of infants' spontaneous mobility, the precision of their postural control and the attention allocated to their posture.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prematurely born children (PC) at school age have academic difficulties related to poorer attention capabilities. Posner (1990) described three distinct attention functions: Alert (to maintain a vigilance state), Orientation (to select the relevant information) and Inhibition (to resist distraction). Additionally, teachers and parents are often concerned because they move more than term born children; this excessive mobility being often quoted as agitation. Some consider it would be related to a poorer postural control potentially explained by a poorer perception of vertical gravity. Another explanation is that this mobility could be an unconscious way for PC to increase their arousal level to improve their attention performance. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the interdependence between postural and cognitive activities in school age PC and term born children (TC). First, the performance of PC and TC at the Attention Network Test for Children will be analyzed evaluating Alert and Inhibition, and its evolution when the infants will use a mobile school chair, compared to a classic school chair. Secondly, participants will perform a test of perception of vertical gravity in which they will have to position a stick vertically. Finally, the spontaneous postural activity of PC and TC (evaluated by the center of pressure displacement measured with a forced plate) will be studied during the execution of three different attention tasks: a vigilance task, a visual search task or an inhibition task at two different levels of difficulty. Success rate and reaction time will be analyzed for all attention tasks. Moreover, center of pressure displacement calculation will allow evaluation of infants' spontaneous mobility, the precision of their postural control and the attention allocated to their posture. Success rate and reaction time will be analyzed for all the attention tasks as well as the angle errors in degree between the stick orientation given by the children and the real vertical. Furthermore, the sway path, the surface area and the entropy of the displacement of CP will be computed to determine respectively the mobility, the precision of the postural control and the attention allocated to the posture of these children.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lorraine
      • Nancy, Lorraine, France, 54035
        • Maternite Regionale Universitaire CHRU NANCY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children born before 37 weeks gestation or at term and routinely followed for their prematurity in the follow-up clinic of the Maternite Regionale Universitaire and healthy term born children recruited after information in different schools of Meurthe-et-Moselle
  • Child whose holders of parental authority have received complete information on the organization of the research and have signed the consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe hypotrophy at birth defined by a weight z-score below -2.
  • Children with developmental, cognitive, visual or motor disability preventing the execution of the tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prematurely born Children

Evaluation of different attention or/and postural activities :

  1. Speed and accuracy answer to visual fish (target) appearance evaluated in two conditions of chair (mobile or classic).
  2. Child perception of the vertical compared to the real vertical
  3. Evaluation of the posture of the child during different visual conditions
  4. Evaluation of the posture of the child during different attention tasks at different levels of difficulty
  1. The children, equipped with a head-mounted display (HMD), will indicate as quickly as possible the direction of a fish that can be surrounded by congruent or not flankers (Inhibition) and/or preceded by signal (Alert)
  2. The children, equipped with a HMD and a joystick, will vertically turn a randomly inclined stick
  3. The children will stand on a force plate watching a cartoon, gazing a fixation cross or eyes closed
  4. The children, equipped with an augmented reality headset, will perform 2 levels of difficulty of 3 attention tasks standing on a force plate:

    • They will click as quickly as possible when they see a frog among successively appearing animals (vigilance task)
    • They will give the name of an animal appearing at one of the windows displayed (visual search task)
    • They will count the number of yellow lions oriented to the right among several animals of different color and direction (inhibition task)
  5. Growth trajectory will be retrieved from health booklet
Active Comparator: Term born Children

Evaluation of different attention or/and postural activities

  1. Speed and accuracy answer to visual fish (target) appearance evaluated in two conditions of chair (mobile or classic).
  2. Child perception of the vertical compared to the real vertical
  3. Evaluation of the posture of the child during different visual conditions
  4. Evaluation of the posture of the child during different attention tasks at different levels of difficulty
  1. The children, equipped with a head-mounted display (HMD), will indicate as quickly as possible the direction of a fish that can be surrounded by congruent or not flankers (Inhibition) and/or preceded by signal (Alert)
  2. The children, equipped with a HMD and a joystick, will vertically turn a randomly inclined stick
  3. The children will stand on a force plate watching a cartoon, gazing a fixation cross or eyes closed
  4. The children, equipped with an augmented reality headset, will perform 2 levels of difficulty of 3 attention tasks standing on a force plate:

    • They will click as quickly as possible when they see a frog among successively appearing animals (vigilance task)
    • They will give the name of an animal appearing at one of the windows displayed (visual search task)
    • They will count the number of yellow lions oriented to the right among several animals of different color and direction (inhibition task)
  5. Growth trajectory will be retrieved from health booklet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy and Reaction time (in msec) to the response to visual target (fish) direction
Time Frame: 8 minutes
40 trials of fishes displayed for a maximum of 2500 msec to the left or the right hand side, by chair condition (classic, mobile), where the child has to give as quickly as possible the direction of the fish
8 minutes
Angle error (in degree) between the stick orientation given by the child and the real vertical
Time Frame: 4 minutes 30 secondes
3 trials of randomly inclined stick by position (sitting, lying to the right, lying to the left) where the child has to turn the stick vertically
4 minutes 30 secondes
Sway path (distance traveled by the center of pressure - CP -) and surface area (ellipse covering 90% of the center of pressure displacement)
Time Frame: 4 minutes 30 secondes
3 x 30 secondes of record on the force plate by standing condition (eyes opened watching a cartoon, gazing a fixation cross, eyes closed) where the child has to stay up without move their feet
4 minutes 30 secondes
Sway path (distance traveled by the center of pressure - CP -), surface area (ellipse covering 90% of the center of pressure displacement) and entropy (index of regularity of postural oscillations)
Time Frame: 12 minutes
2 x 1 minutes of record on the force plate by level of difficulty (easy, difficult) and by task (vigilance task, visual search task, inhibition task)
12 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobility

Clinical Trials on Evaluation of different attention or/and postural activities

Subscribe