- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07504237
SAFER Karachi - A Fall Prevention Intervention (SAFER)
SAFER Karachi: Strengthening an Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention for Resilience in Older Adults - A Pilot Study in Karachi
The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and short-term effects of a culturally adapted and strengthened fall prevention program in older adults aged 60 years and above living in urban Karachi, Pakistan. The study aims to understand whether a structured, community-based intervention can improve mobility, confidence, and overall well-being, while reducing the risk of falls.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is the adapted and strengthened fall prevention program feasible and acceptable for older adults in Karachi?
- Does participation in the program improve mobility, balance, fall-related self-efficacy, and emotional well-being among participants?
Participants will:
- Take part in a 7-week group-based fall prevention program that includes strength and balance exercises, home safety education, medication awareness, and behavioural strategies
- Receive a follow-up home visit to reinforce safety practices and environmental modifications
- Attend a booster session after 3 months to support continued engagement
- Complete assessments at baseline and follow-up, including mobility, cognitive function, quality of life, and emotional well-being
- Maintain monthly fall logs to report any fall incidents during the study period
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Falls are a major public health concern among older adults and are a leading cause of injury, disability, and loss of independence worldwide. The burden is particularly high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over 80% of fall-related deaths occur. In Pakistan, and especially in urban settings like Karachi, older adults face compounded risks due to limited access to geriatric care, inadequate home safety infrastructure, financial constraints, and reliance on informal caregiving systems. Despite this growing burden, fall prevention remains underexplored and under-implemented in the local context.
Most evidence-based fall prevention interventions have been developed and tested in high-income countries, raising concerns about their applicability in LMIC settings due to differences in environmental conditions, health system structures, cultural norms, and resource availability. There is a critical need to adapt and evaluate such interventions to ensure they are feasible, acceptable, and effective within the local context.
The SAFER Karachi study (Strengthening an Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention for Resilience in Older Adults) is a pilot quasi-experimental study designed to address this gap. The study aims to adapt, strengthen, and evaluate a culturally relevant fall prevention intervention for community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above in urban Karachi.
The intervention is based on the evidence-based Stepping On program, a multi-component fall prevention strategy that integrates strength and balance training, environmental safety education, medication awareness, and behavioural change approaches to improve self-efficacy and reduce fall risk. While the core structure of the program will be retained, context-specific adaptations and strengthening measures will be incorporated to enhance feasibility, safety, and relevance in a low-resource urban setting. These include standardized facilitator training, physiotherapist-informed delivery of exercise components, integration of supportive tools to improve adherence, and minor refinements informed by formative research and local implementation considerations.
The study will use a pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental design and will enroll approximately 50 older adults from selected urban communities in Karachi. The intervention will be delivered over a 7-week period through structured group sessions led by trained facilitators. Each session will focus on key components of fall prevention, including physical exercises, home hazard identification, medication-related risk awareness, vision and footwear considerations, and behavioural strategies to support long-term adherence. Peer interaction and social support will be emphasized to enhance engagement and sustainability.
Following the core intervention, participants will receive a home visit to reinforce behavioural changes and environmental modifications, as well as a booster session to support continued engagement and retention of key practices.
The primary focus of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the adapted intervention in Karachi's urban community settings. Feasibility will be evaluated through indicators such as recruitment rates, retention, session attendance, and adherence to intervention components. Acceptability will be assessed through participant feedback, qualitative interviews, and facilitator observations, providing insights into user experience and implementation challenges.
In addition, the study will assess short-term changes in selected health and functional outcomes, including mobility and balance, fall-related self-efficacy, cognitive function, emotional well-being, nutritional status, sleep quality, and overall quality of life. Participants will also maintain monthly fall logs to document fall occurrences, providing preliminary data to inform future research, although the study is not powered to detect long-term reductions in fall incidence.
Data collection will include baseline and follow-up assessments using standardized and validated tools, as well as qualitative interviews to explore participant experiences, barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for improvement. These findings will be used to further refine the intervention and enhance its contextual fit.
This pilot study is designed to generate critical preliminary evidence to inform a larger, fully powered trial. By identifying key implementation challenges, participant engagement patterns, and early outcome trends, the study will contribute to the development of a scalable, culturally appropriate fall prevention model for Pakistan and similar LMIC settings.
Ultimately, the SAFER Karachi study seeks to shift the focus from reactive management of fall-related injuries to proactive, community-based prevention strategies. By improving mobility, confidence, and overall well-being among older adults, this intervention has the potential to enhance independence and quality of life while reducing the burden on families and health systems.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74800
- Aga Khan University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older adults, aged 60 years and above, residing in urban Karachi
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who rely on assistive devices for mobility
- Individuals who are bedbound or homebound and require full-time assistance
- Individuals with diagnosed cognitive impairment or dementia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Participants will receive a 7-week group-based fall prevention intervention adapted for the local context.
The program focuses on improving strength, balance, and safety awareness among older adults, with additional follow-up through a home visit and booster session to support sustained behaviour change.
|
This intervention is a culturally adapted and contextually strengthened version of the evidence-based Stepping On fall prevention program, tailored for older adults in a low-resource urban setting. Unlike standard implementations, this version incorporates context-specific modifications based on local environmental, social, and health system realities in Karachi. Key distinguishing features include structured facilitator training to ensure standardized delivery, physiotherapist-informed guidance for exercise components to enhance safety, and integration of supportive tools to improve participant adherence and engagement. The intervention also includes follow-up reinforcement through home visits and a booster session to support sustained behaviour change. These adaptations are designed to improve feasibility, acceptability, and scalability of the intervention within resource-constrained settings while retaining the core evidence-based components of the original program. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of the Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention: Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of recruitment (up to 2 months)
|
Proportion of eligible participants enrolled in the study.
Expressed as a percentage (0-100%), with higher values indicating better feasibility.
|
From baseline to the end of recruitment (up to 2 months)
|
|
Feasibility of the Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention: Retention Rate
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Proportion of enrolled participants who complete the study.
Expressed as a percentage (0-100%), with higher values indicating better feasibility.
|
From baseline to the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Feasibility of the Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention: Session Attendance
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Number or proportion of intervention sessions attended by participants.
Reported as a percentage or count, with higher values indicating better adherence.
|
From baseline to the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Feasibility of the Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention: Adherence to Intervention
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Extent to which participants follow prescribed intervention components.
Reported as a proportion or score, with higher values indicating better adherence.
|
From baseline to the end of intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Acceptability of the Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention: Acceptability Score
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the intervention anf follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Measured using a Likert-scale questionnaire (e.g., 1-5), where higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.
|
From baseline to the end of the intervention anf follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Acceptability of the Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention: Participant Experience (Qualitative)
Time Frame: At the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 1 month)
|
Assessed through qualitative interviews exploring participant experiences and perceptions of the intervention.
Data will be analyzed thematically.
|
At the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 1 month)
|
|
Acceptability of the Adapted Fall Prevention Intervention: Facilitator Evaluation
Time Frame: At the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 1 month)
|
Facilitator-reported acceptability will be assessed using a structured questionnaire adapted from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), a validated 4-item scale evaluating appropriateness, satisfaction, appeal, and willingness to continue. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). A mean score (range: 1-5) will be calculated, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. In addition, facilitators will complete a Structured Intervention Delivery Assessment Checklist covering ease of delivery, fidelity, and participant engagement. Items will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor/not at all to 5 = excellent/to a great extent). Mean domain and overall scores (range: 1-5) will be calculated, with higher scores indicating better implementation. Responses will be summarized descriptively. |
At the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 1 month)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Assessed using the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living.
Scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater independence.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Fall-Related Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Measured using the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale.
Scores range from 0 to 10 (or tool-specific range), with higher scores indicating greater confidence in performing activities without falling.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Mobility and Balance
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.
Performance is measured in seconds, with shorter times indicating better mobility and balance.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Nutritional Status
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Measured using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA).
Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Sleep Quality
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Quality of Life
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF).
Domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Cognitive Function
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Emotional Well-being
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).
Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.
|
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
|
Short-term Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes: Adherence to Safety Modifications
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Adherence to recommended home and community safety modifications will be assessed using a structured Self-Reported Safety Modification Adherence Checklist developed for this study based on standard fall prevention guidelines from multiple sources, including the Otago guidelines, WHO, and more. The checklist will include multiple items covering home environment modifications, use of assistive devices, and safe mobility practices. Each item will be scored as 0 (not implemented), 1 (partially implemented), or 2 (fully implemented). A total adherence score will be calculated by summing item responses, with scores ranging from 0 to the maximum possible based on applicable items; higher scores indicate greater adherence. Adherence may also be expressed as a proportion (%) of recommended modifications implemented. |
At baseline and at the end of the intervention and follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fall Incidence
Time Frame: Monthly during follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Number of self-reported falls recorded using monthly fall logs during follow-up.
|
Monthly during follow-up (up to 6 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sonia Sameen, MSc., Aga Khan University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Stepping On Program, https://www.steppingon.com/
- Mahoney JE, Gangnon R, Clemson L, Jaros L, Cech S, Renken J. Outcomes associated with scale-up of the Stepping On falls prevention program: A case study in redesigning for dissemination. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 4;4(3):250-259. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.17.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-11554-35416
- D43TW007292 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in this study will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Data will be shared after publication of the primary study results and will include variables necessary to reproduce the findings.
All data sharing will be subject to approval by the principal investigator and the Aga Khan University Ethics Review Committee, and will require a data sharing agreement to ensure confidentiality, ethical use, and compliance with institutional policies.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Falls Injury
-
Peking UniversityActive, not recruitingFalls Injury | Falls | Fall PreventionChina
-
Birmingham Community Healthcare NHSBirmingham City UniversityCompleted
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedFall Injury | Falls | Exercise Self-Efficacy | Falls Self-EfficacyUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Youngstown State UniversityYMCANot yet recruitingFall | Fall Injury | Falls (Accidents) in Old AgeUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; Institut... and other collaboratorsCompletedFractures | Accidental Falls | Fall-related InjuriesFrance
-
Masimo CorporationCompletedFalls Injury | Pressure Ulcer | Pressure InjuryUnited States
-
National University, SingaporeRecruitingFalls Prevention | Falls RiskSingapore
-
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS TrustRecruitingHead Injury | Falls | Older Adults (65 Years and Older)United Kingdom
-
The Hospital District of SatakuntaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Stepping On Fall Prevention Program
-
University of South CarolinaActive, not recruitingTaekwondo-based Fall Prevention Exercise Condition | Fall Prevention Education Control ConditionUnited States
-
University of HaifaWestern Galilee Hospital-NahariyaActive, not recruiting
-
Geriatric Education and Research InstituteMonash University; Khoo Teck Puat Hospital; Tan Tock Seng Hospital; Duke-NUS Graduate... and other collaboratorsCompletedFear of Falling | Physical PerformanceSingapore
-
Blue Marble Rehab IncNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Partners In Care FoundationCompleted
-
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityCompleted
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNeuroscience Research AustraliaUnknownKnee Osteoarthritis | FallHong Kong
-
Helse Møre og Romsdal HFNorwegian University of Science and Technology; Sykehuset Innlandet HFCompletedAccidental Falls | Hospitalized PatientsNorway
-
New York UniversityCompleted
-
New York UniversityCompletedHealthy Aging | Accidental Fall | Injury PreventionUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; Institut... and other collaboratorsCompletedFractures | Accidental Falls | Fall-related InjuriesFrance