Reaching and Engaging Depressed Senior Center Clients (REDS II)

Reaching and Engaging Depressed Senior Center Clients Phase II

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of one type of therapy session, Virtual Augmented Engage (Engage-A). The research is being done because the researchers are trying to learn if these approaches could be used by therapists in the community social service agencies to treat older adults with depression. The research will also measure clinician satisfaction after training and supervision of utilization of Engage-A.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • White Plains, New York, United States, 10605
        • Weill Cornell Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 55 years' old
  • PHQ-9 Score of ≥ 10
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • MOCA ≥ 24 or mini-telephone MOCA ≥ 11
  • Member of/attends one of the REDS Senior Centers
  • Capacity to provide written consent for both research assessment and the Engage-A intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current active suicidal ideation defined by MADRS Suicide Item ≥ 4 (probably better off dead. Suicidal thoughts are common, and suicide is considered as a possible solution, but without specific plans or intention).
  • Presence of psychiatric diagnoses other than unipolar, non-psychotic major depression or generalized anxiety disorder by SCID-IV.
  • Severe or life-threatening medical illness (e.g., end stage organ failure).
  • Currently seeing an individual psychotherapist *(if individuals are willing to go on a hiatus from their individual psychotherapist for the 15 weeks of the study, and meet all inclusion criteria, they will be considered eligible).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Engage-A
Participants receive 9 individual in-person or remote therapy sessions. Each session will last approximately 60 minutes. During the sessions, the therapist will encourage the participant to engage in physical and social activities that are pleasurable or rewarding.
Therapist will encourage participants to engage in physical and social activities that are pleasurable or rewarding. Engage is a stepped care psychotherapy based on what is known about how older adults respond to depression interventions. Stepped care is a model of treatment that starts with the minimum effective therapeutic techniques first, and then based on how well people respond to treatment, additional therapeutic techniques are added until people are recovered from their depression.
Other Names:
  • Augmented Engage
Experimental: Clinician
Clinicians will be trained in Engage-A and supervised while utilizing the therapy.
Therapist will be trained in Engage-A therapy and given supervision while utilizing this therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Virtual ENGAGE-A Participants Who Attend Every Scheduled Therapy Session
Time Frame: 9 Weeks
Number of Virtual ENGAGE-A Participants who Attend Every Scheduled Therapy Session
9 Weeks
Change in Average Satisfaction Score of Virtual ENGAGE-A Participants as Measured by the CSQ
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) assesses the clients' satisfaction with the services they are receiving. The CSQ ranges from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. Domain 1 scores range from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with the program. Domain 2 scores range from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with the services received. Domain 3 scores range from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher likelihood of wanting to receive similar services in the future. Higher scores for all three domains indicate a better outcome.
6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks
Average Satisfaction Score of Community Clinicians (LCSW) as Measured by the TSQ
Time Frame: 2 years
The Therapist Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) assesses the therapists' satisfaction with the Alacrity therapy training and intervention. The TSQ ranges from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. Domain 1 scores range from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with the skills obtained through training. Domain 2 scores range from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with the therapy type. Domain 3 scores range from 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher likelihood that the therapist would use this therapy in their own practice. Higher scores for all three domains indicate better outcomes.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depressive Symptoms of Virtual ENGAGE-A Participants as Measured by HAM-D
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 week, 9 week, 12 week
Hamilton Depression Rating Score (HAM-D) assesses the severity of depression in patients. The HAM-D ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating higher severity of depression.
Baseline, 6 week, 9 week, 12 week
Change in Behavioral Activation of Virtual ENGAGE-A Participants as Measured by the BADS
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 week, 9 week, 12 week

The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) measures levels of behavioral activation.

The BADS ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating lower levels of behavioral activation. Domain 1 scores range from 0-42. Higher scores (better outcome) indicate greater activation. Domain 2 scores range from 0-48. Higher scores (worse outcome) indicate greater Avoidance and Rumination. Domain 3 scores range from 0-30. Higher scores (worse outcome) indicate greater Work/School impairment. Domain 4 scores range from 0-30. Higher scores (worse outcome) indicate greater social impairment.

Baseline, 6 week, 9 week, 12 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patricia Marino, PhD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-09020810-02
  • 5P50MH113838-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data from this study is submitted to the National Database for Clinical Trials related to Mental Illness (NDCT). The NDCT is run by NIH and allows researchers studying mental health to collect and share information with each other. Researchers must apply to NIH in order to be allowed access to the data for 1 year's time; after which they must re-apply.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available as per NIMH's data sharing policy.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access criteria is determined by NIMH and can be requested by applying online.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression in Old Age

Clinical Trials on Engage-A

Subscribe