Engaging Depressed Low-Income Seniors in Mental Health Services (ENGAGE)

November 6, 2017 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University

This two-stage research study will

  1. train caseworkers in three participating New York City Neighborhood Houses to screen their clients for depression, and
  2. examine the usefulness of training these caseworkers in an intervention that targets barriers seniors face in receiving mental health services. In this intervention, called ENGAGE, Case Workers will: 1. identify and address seniors' barriers to receiving mental health services; 2. include the seniors' preferences in deciding which treatment options to choose; and 3. help seniors connect with affordable mental health services of their choice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this research study, study investigators are partnering with United Neighborhood Houses of New York, the umbrella membership organization of the 34 New York City Neighborhood Houses. Due to the limited scope of this feasibility study, we have selected three Houses to serve as recruitment sites. These three house approximate the gender and racial characteristics of the larger group.

During Stage 1, investigators will work with the three Houses in implementing systematic research assessments to identify level of psychopathology, referral patterns, and connections to mental health evaluation among their depressed senior clients. Investigators will train caseworkers to screen their clients for depression and will also instruct caseworkers to refer any senior scoring endorsing depressive symptoms to their partnering community-based mental health or medical clinic. Data on successful connections to mental health evaluation will serve as the comparison to that achieved by Stage 2, the ENGAGE intervention.

During Stage 2 study investigators will train all caseworkers from each Neighborhood House to use the ENGAGE intervention. For eligible depressed seniors, the caseworker will:

  1. provide psychoeducation that addresses client-specific barriers to evaluation and care (e.g., stigma, transportation);
  2. use shared decision-making strategies to engage seniors and arrive at a decision about where and from whom to receive an evaluation and possible care; and
  3. provide connections to preferred mental health services. Mental health service options will include referral to the senior's primary care physician or local community mental health clinic for further evaluation.

In two subsequent sessions 2 and 4 weeks later, the caseworker will assess success in receiving a mental health evaluation, and in initiating treatment:

  • If the senior has not yet pursued an evaluation, the caseworker will continue to address his/her individual barriers and will re-engage in shared decision-making if necessary.
  • If the senior did receive an evaluation that confirms a depressive diagnosis, but remains undecided about treatment, the case worker will empower and help the senior to select an appropriate treatment of his/her choice and will encourage ongoing engagement in this treatment.
  • If an evaluation revealed the absence of a depressive disorder and no treatment recommendations, the caseworker will re-assess to ensure that depression did not emerge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60 years and older.
  • Positive screen for major depression (PHQ-9 greater than 10): We chose standard PHQ-9 screening to correspond to routine procedures within each House that identify seniors in need of evaluation for treatment.
  • Capacity to provide written consent for both research assessment and treatment. This criterion is necessary because subjects must be able to participate meaningfully in the interventions offered by the study and the assessment procedures.
  • Working knowledge of English. Fluency in English sufficient for comprehending questionnaires of the study and/or for understanding the case worker. English does not have to be the subject's first language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MMSE score < 24 or clinical diagnosis of dementia. Dementia, or cognitive impairment at this level may limit the senior's ability to participate in the intervention.
  • Psychotic or manic symptoms or alcohol or substance dependence. These symptoms and disorders will be determined by the SCID assessment and require alternative interventions than those offered by the study. We focus in this project on seniors with depressive symptoms given existing Neighborhood House procedures for standard depression screening, and given difficulties in training case worker staff on screening for other psychiatric disorders. If this project is successful, we may then expand our efforts to target other disorders such as psychotic, manic, and alcohol and substance abuse and dependence disorders.
  • Antidepressant medication or psychotherapy in the 4 weeks prior to baseline evaluation. The intervention is focused on linking depressed seniors who are in need of mental health services rather than those currently receiving treatment.
  • Acute or severe medical illness: i.e., delirium, metastatic cancer, decompensated cardiac, liver or kidney failure, major surgery, stroke or myocardial infarction during the three months prior to entry; or drugs often causing depression, e.g., steroids, reserpine, alpha-methyl-dopa, tamoxifen, vincristine.
  • Antisocial personality by DSM-IV: This disorder will possibly interfere with adherence to research procedures and treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ENGAGE

In stage 1, study investigators will train Neighborhood House caseworkers to screen their clients for depressive symptoms.

In stage 2, study investigators will train Neighborhood House caseworkers to use the ENGAGE intervention in referring their clients to mental health services

During Stage 2, investigators will train Neighborhood House caseworkers to 1. provide psychoeducation that addresses client-specific barriers to evaluation and care; 2. use shared decision-making strategies to engage seniors and arrive at a decision about where and from whom to receive an evaluation and possible care; and 3. provide connections to preferred community-based mental health services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of ENGAGE intervention
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks
Examine the feasibility of training case workers in 3 Neighborhood Houses in ENGAGE - an intervention that identifies and addresses attitudinal and concrete barriers to pursuing evaluation and care; incorporates shared decision making in service and treatment options; and facilitates connection to affordable mental health services.
Measured at Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increase in referrals for mental health evaluation
Time Frame: Measured at Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks
Conduct a preliminary study to evaluate whether ENGAGE can increase the number of seniors (with symptoms of depression on a screen) who follow through with a referral for mental health evaluation.
Measured at Baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick J. Raue, Ph.D., Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P30MH085943-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • P30MH085943 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on ENGAGE

3
Subscribe