Loneliness and Health: The Moderating Role of Befriending Services (HALO)

March 5, 2020 updated by: Joanna McHugh, University of Dublin, Trinity College

Befriending services deliver companionship to older adults through regular volunteer visits. ALONE is a charitable organisation providing befriending services to older adults in Ireland. It is the mission statement of ALONE to use befriending to reduce the negative impact loneliness has on health, but evidence for this use of befriending is yet to be sufficiently provided. Providing such evidence would help organisations like ALONE to convince policymakers of the need for, and importance of, their services. The research uses a rigorous scientific approach to evaluate the effect of befriending services on health. Two domains of health thought to be particularly important for ageing adults are evaluated: health-related quality of life (HrQoL), and cognitive function. Maximising HrQoL should be a goal of any healthcare intervention, while cognitive function is associated with dementia risk, a major factor threatening independence in later life. The research is also investigating whether befriending can reduce the negative effect that loneliness is known to have on health of older adults. Service users, befriending volunteers, and professionals involved with the service, will be interviewed by researchers, to see if there are other ways that befriending might improve health. An economic analysis of the service, to evaluate its cost, is also planned. Findings will then be translated all findings into befriending service recommendations for the Department of Health.

To conduct this research, 85 new befriending service users are needed. 10-15 pairs of befriender-befriendees will also be interviewed, and 5-10 health and social care professionals involved with the service. Expected outcomes are to provide ALONE with scientific evidence related to the effects of befriending services on health, and to influence policymakers by clarifying the extent of the economic and health benefits of befriending services.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Loneliness is related to poor health in later life. One way in which loneliness is often addressed is via befriending services, such as those offered by ALONE. The mission statement of ALONE's befriending service is to reduce the impact of loneliness on poor health. ALONE have identified a need for an empirical evaluation of the potential benefits of befriending services. Aims: The proposed research aims to create empirical evidence regarding the impact of befriending services on health and loneliness, assisting ALONE in developing and refining their mission statement. The research question is: "Do befriending services improve health (measured as health-related quality of life and cognitive function), and do they mitigate the impact of loneliness on health?" A secondary aim is to identify, using exploratory methods, potential mechanisms through which befriending impacts health.

Plan of Investigation: A mixed methods design, integrating qualitative and quantitative methods, is planned.

The quantitative component comprises an AB single-case experimental multiple baseline design, analysed using generalised additive modelling, and the qualitative component comprises semi-structured interviews (with befriender-befriendee dyads and healthcare professionals associated with the service) designed and analysed according to the principles of grounded theory. Results will be integrated according to mixed methods guidelines, undergo triangulation, and an economic analysis will evaluate the cost should the service be rolled out nationally. All results will be integrated to form the basis of recommendations for the befriending sector, to be disseminated to policymakers. Results will also be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and lay report.

Potential Impact: The study has potential to improve the service offered by ALONE by empirically testing its effectiveness and mechanisms of action, influence policy with this information, and contribute to theoretical understanding of the nature of the relationship between befriending, loneliness, and health.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

85

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Dublin, Ireland, D2
        • Recruiting
        • Trinity College Dublin
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being interested in becoming an ALONE befriending service user
  • being aged over 60
  • having ability to provide informed consent
  • having sufficient sensory ability to engage in an interview (if engaging in qualitative component of study)
  • self-report of loneliness (responds yes to the question "do you sometimes feel lonely?")

Exclusion Criteria:

  • self-report of receipt of a diagnosis by a doctor of any of the following: intellectual disability including autism spectrum disorder or psychotic disorder, dementia, or serious memory impairment
  • Living outside the greater Dublin area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single group
An AB single-case experimental design will be used. An RCT would be inappropriate since the befriending intervention is known to improve wellbeing. As such participants will have data collected in a pre- and post-intervention phase, for a maximum of 13 time points. This approach has been identified by What Works Clearinghouse as an acceptable empirical design to include in evidence based practice reviews (Kratchowill et al., 2010).
Participants are new users of the ALONE befriending intervention, which matches participants to volunteer befrienders who visit once weekly for a minimum of 12 months. It is a criterion of study involvement that participants commit to completing at least two data collection timepoints before being matched to a befriender.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Loneliness
Time Frame: Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total). At each point of testing, participants are asked to reflect on their loneliness at that point in time.
University of California at Los Angeles 5-item loneliness scale: This is a five item well validated scale of loneliness suitable for use in older adults. Each item yields scores between 0 and 2. Overall minimum score is 0 and overall maximum score is 10 with higher scores indicating more loneliness.
Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total). At each point of testing, participants are asked to reflect on their loneliness at that point in time.
Change in Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total). At each point of testing, participants are asked to reflect on their health-related quality of life at that point in time.
EuroQol 5-Dimension (3-levelL) scale. A well validated scale of health-related quality of life which measures five dimensions of health across three possible levels. Scores can be combined to a summary score which is between 0 (worst health/death) and 1 (best possible health).
Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total). At each point of testing, participants are asked to reflect on their health-related quality of life at that point in time.
Changes in Semantic memory
Time Frame: Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total).
Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System verbal fluency tests standard and alternate: these tests elicit participants' ability to name as many items belonging to a given category (animals, words beginning with F, fruits) as possible in 60 seconds. The minimum value (worst performance) is 0; there is no theoretical maximum value but higher scores indicate better performance.
Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Social support
Time Frame: Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total). At each point of testing, participants are asked to reflect on their social support at that point in time.
Lubben social network scale (6 item version) - this is a scale which is well validated to be used in older populations and measures social support. Six items ask questions about social support from different sources and scores for each item range from 0-5. The total summed score ranges from a minimum value of 0 (lowest level of social support) to 30 (maximum level of social support).
Measured from baseline (point of study registration) and again every two weeks for max. 13 time-points (i.e. 26 weeks in total). At each point of testing, participants are asked to reflect on their social support at that point in time.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joanna McHugh Power, PhD, University of Dublin, Trinity College

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APA2017004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loneliness

Clinical Trials on befriending

3
Subscribe