Effects of Thermal Stimulation on Motor Recovery and Neuromuscular Property of Lower Extremity in Stroke

November 15, 2023 updated by: KMUHIRB-F(II)-20200009, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Neurorehabilitation Lab at Department of Physical Therapy in KMU

This 3-year study will recruit a total of 72 subjects with first-ever stroke after 3 months onset from the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in 3 teaching hospitals. This study design employs a prospective single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with pretest, posttest, and follow-up assessments. Participants who meet and be willing to join this study will be assigned into one of three groups (noxious cold only, noxious heat only, or alternative TS). All subjects will receive conventional rehabilitation. In addition, three groups will receive an additional TS protocol with a total of 15 sessions for 3 weeks (5 times per week, 30 minutes daily). Primary outcome measures include the LE subscale of Fugl-Meyer assessment, the modified Ashworth scale, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, Timed Up and Go test, and the Barthel index. Moreover, spinal circuit excitability will be assessed by measuring Hoffmann reflex/ M wave ratio, H-reflex recruitment curves, and reciprocal inhibition of the soleus muscle. Muscle properties will be evaluated by measuring the soleus muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness. All participants will be assessed with the outcome measures at beginning of the intervention, the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Effective evaluation and treatment for lower extremity (LE) motor and function recovery in patients with stroke have been one of the primary goals for rehabilitation therapy. The purposes of this study are to compare immediate and long-term treatment effects among noxious cold only, noxious heat only, and alternative thermal stimulation (TS) on the LE motor recovery and neuromuscular properties and to investigate the relationships among spinal circuit excitability, muscle properties, and motor function of LE in patients with chronic stroke.

This 3-year study will recruit a total of 72 subjects with first-ever stroke after 3 months onset from the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in 3 teaching hospitals. This study design employs a prospective single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with pretest, posttest, and follow-up assessments. Participants who meet and be willing to join this study will be assigned into one of three groups (noxious cold only, noxious heat only, or alternative TS). All subjects will receive conventional rehabilitation. In addition, three groups will receive an additional TS protocol with a total of 15 sessions for 3 weeks (5 times per week, 30 minutes daily). Primary outcome measures include the LE subscale of Fugl-Meyer assessment, the modified Ashworth scale, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, Timed Up and Go test, and the Barthel index. Moreover, spinal circuit excitability will be assessed by measuring Hoffmann reflex/ M wave ratio, H-reflex recruitment curves, and reciprocal inhibition of the soleus muscle. Muscle properties will be evaluated by measuring the soleus muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness. All participants will be assessed with the outcome measures at one week before the intervention, beginning of the intervention, the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance will be used to investigate the effects among the three groups across time points tested with adequate post-hoc comparisons.

The results of this study will help to understand the immediate and long-term effects of motor recovery of different TS modes and the adaptive change of neuromuscular properties as well to select the more effective TS treatment mode on facilitating LE motor and function recovery in patients with stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Select One...
      • Kaohsiung city, Select One..., Taiwan, 886807
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Willing to participate to this study with written informed consent
  2. First-ever stroke
  3. More six months after stroke onset
  4. Ability to maintain an independent sitting posture for at least 30 minutes
  5. Mini Mental Status Examination score more than 24

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Skin disease, skin injuries, burns, or fresh scars over the thermal stimulation application area
  2. Contraindication of ice or heat application
  3. Uncontrolled blood pressure and heart conditions
  4. History of diabetes with known peripheral vascular pathology
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Unable to communicate with simple instruction or aphasia
  7. Receiving Botulinum toxin drug treatment
  8. Considered as unsuitable by the principal investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: noxious cold group
The group received noxious cold (3 - 4°C) stimuli on the affected leg for 30 minutes.
The protocol included range of motion, ambulation, endurance, strengthening, reconditioning exercise, and home program education according to therapists' plans and the patients' ability.
Active Comparator: noxious heat group
The group received noxious heat (46 - 47°C) stimuli on the affected leg for 30 minutes.
The protocol included range of motion, ambulation, endurance, strengthening, reconditioning exercise, and home program education according to therapists' plans and the patients' ability.
Active Comparator: alternative thermal stimulation group
The group received alternative noxious heat (46 - 47°C) and noxious cold (3 - 4°C) stimuli on the affected leg for 30 minutes.
The protocol included range of motion, ambulation, endurance, strengthening, reconditioning exercise, and home program education according to therapists' plans and the patients' ability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Lower Extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-LE)
Time Frame: Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The FMA-LE consists of 17 items, each scored on a 3-point scale (0 to 2). The total score of the FMA-LE ranges from 0 to 34, and higher scores indicate better motor performance.
Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS)
Time Frame: Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The PASS is a 4-point rating (0 to 3) scale with well-established reliability and validity that measures balance function in persons with stroke. The total score of the PASS ranges from 0 to 36, and higher scores indicate greater balance function.
Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Time Frame: Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The modified Ashworth scale is a 6-point rating scale (0 to 5) with well-established inter-rater reliability that measures muscle tone of ankle plantarflexor in persons with stroke. Higher MAS scores indicate greater severity of spasticity.
Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The Barthel index (BI)
Time Frame: Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The Barthel index is used to evaluate activity of daily living function.The Barthel index consists of 10 items. The total score of the Barthel index ranges from 0 to 20, and higher scores indicate better outcome.
Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
Timed up and go test(TUG)
Time Frame: Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses mobility by measuring the time it takes for someone to stand, walk a short distance, turn, and sit back down. Faster times suggest better mobility, while longer times may indicate mobility limitations or fall risk. It's a useful tool to evaluate functional capacity and guide interventions for improved mobility.
Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spinal circuit excitability
Time Frame: Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
Spinal circuit excitability will be assessed by measuring Hoffmann reflex/ M wave ratio of the soleus muscle. Higher scores indicate poorer outcome.
Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
Muscle properties
Time Frame: Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.
Muscle properties will be evaluated by measuring the soleus muscle stiffness. Higher scores indicate poorer outcome.
Change from the beginning of the intervention to the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jau-Hong Lin, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Cardiovascular

Clinical Trials on Traditional Rehabilitation Therapy

3
Subscribe