Shade Evaluation of Monochromatic Versus Polychromatic Layering Techniques Inrestoration of Fractured Incisal Angle

April 21, 2020 updated by: Basma Badry Khalaf Hashem, Cairo University

Shade Evaluation of Monochromatic Versus Polychromatic Layering Techniques in Restoration of Fractured Incisal Angle: Randomized Controlled Trial

This clincl trial will be conducted to compare theShade Evaluation of Monochromatic versus Polychromatic layering techniques in restoration of Fractured incisal angle

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The use of enamel and dentin shades allow us to reproduce anatomical features such as incisal edge translucency, halo effect, other internal colors and pigments such as craze lines, white patches, white horizontal striations .

Anterior composites usually have small filler particles to increase smoothness, nanotechnology has enabled recent advances in dental composite restorations. As a result , a different category of composite resins has emerged, known as nanocomposites.

However polychromatic layering is considered to be technique sensitive, from detection of details to proper reproduction of such fine details.

The presence of discrepancies between the classic shade guides and the actual shade of composite makes that task more difficult.

The use of monochromatic layering with only body shade can serve as a substitute for enamel and dentin, since it has an intermediate opacity between enamel and dentin , and can serve as an easier option with less technique sensitivity than polychromatic layering.

Filtek universal as claimed by the company manufacturer to have A "NaturalMatch" which is a term that describes the combination of 3M technologies and features present within 3M™ Filtek™ Universal restorative.

it contains nanofillers, pigments and proprietary low-stress monomers which gives Filtek™ Universal Restorative a combination of esthetic and universal opacity which in turn allow shade blending and making the restoration more invisible with surrounding dentition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with fractured incisal angle.
  2. Vital teeth.
  3. Anterior Permanent teeth.
  4. Good oral hygiene.
  5. Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non vital teeth.
  2. Severe or active periodontal disease.
  3. Severe medical complications.
  4. Uncooperative patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Restoration of anterior teeth using monochromatic layering technique using body shade (filtek universal from 3m
universal nanofillers resin composite (3M™ Filtek™ Universal )
Active Comparator: comparator
Restoration of anterior teeth using polychromatic layering technique using Enamel and Dentin shades (filtek Z350 xt from 3m
universal nanofillers resin composite (3M™ Filtek™ Universal )

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shade matching
Time Frame: immediate after restoration
shade matching using Modified USPHS Criteria and Visual inspection using Digital Photography
immediate after restoration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3M™ Filtek™ Universal

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Teeth

Clinical Trials on (3M™ Filtek™ Universal )

3
Subscribe