Sectional Versus Full Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneers

June 21, 2024 updated by: Nehal Gamal, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts

Marginal Adaptation, Color Stability and Clinical Performance of Sectional and Full Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneers. A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the study is to assess the marginal adaptation, color stability and clinical performance of glass ceramic sectional veneers compared to full laminate veneers There's two null hypotheses , the first is that there is no difference in the marginal adaptation of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneers.

the Second is that there is no apparent change in color stability and clinical performance of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although seeking for more minimally invasive treatment modalities with the use of the new advancements in ceramics and adhesive materials, however there is insufficient clinical studies assessing the ultraconservative sectional veneers has been published although there are many published case reports proving their success .

Hence the aim of this study is to assess the sectional veneers compared to laminate veneer regarding marginal adaptation, color stability and clinical performance

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Giza, 6th October City
      • Giza, Giza, 6th October City, Egypt, 12451
        • October University for Modern Sciences & Arts

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients seeking for esthetics with the following criteria
  • Male or female patients age range above 18 years old
  • Minor esthetic defects in anterior region
  • Multiple spacing
  • diastemas
  • Incisal fracture
  • Initial proximal caries
  • Patients able physically and psychologically to tolerate restorative procedures
  • Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation
  • Class I occlusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients free of:
  • Tempromandibular disorders
  • Para-functional habits
  • Cracked teeth
  • Moderate or deep caries
  • Heavily discolored teeth
  • Heavy smokers
  • Enamel defects compromising bonding
  • Active periodontal disease
  • Pulpal disease
  • Mobility
  • Occlusal disturbances
  • Class II and III occlusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intervention- Glass ceramic sectional veneer
participants receive Glass ceramic sectional veneer covering only the area of defect
partial laminate veneer
Active Comparator: control-Glass ceramic laminate veneer
participants receive laminate veneers made of glass ceramics as it is well documented in the literatures as successful restoration modality
Glass ceramic laminate veneer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal adaptation of sectional and full glass ceramic laminate veneer using digital device intraoral scanner
Time Frame: Baseline,3,6,9,12 months
assessment of the marginal adaptation using digital device intraoral scanner software
Baseline,3,6,9,12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Color stability
Time Frame: Baseline,3,6,9,12 months
assessment of the Color stability using intraoral scanner
Baseline,3,6,9,12 months
Clinical performance
Time Frame: Baseline,3,6,9,12 months
categorical outcome of clinical performance using FDI(World Dental Federation) criteria
Baseline,3,6,9,12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nehal G Mohamed, BDS, October University for Modern Sciences & Arts

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spacing of Anterior Teeth

Clinical Trials on Glass ceramic sectional veneer

Subscribe