COVID-19 Infection: Exploration of Respiratory Control Center Abnormalities (CRC-COVID)

August 27, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Do Respiratory Control Center Anomalies Explain the Lack of Respiratory Sensations Perceptions Observed in Patients Affected by COVID-19 ?

The purpose of the present study is to determine whether there is a decrease in the emotional response to experimental induction of dyspnea by hypoxic stimulation in subjects with a "neurological" form of COVID-19, compared to healthy controls.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

SARS CoV-2 infection causes lung damage that can be severe enough to require artificial ventilation. Clinicians taking care of these patients are surprised by the scant respiratory sensations and emotional responses described by patients. This attenuation of respiratory interoception deprives clinicians of the usual warning signs during respiratory decompensation of dyspnea and its aggravation. It may be the result of central nerve damage. This hypothesis is bolstered by the observation that within the multiple clinical forms of COVID-19 infection there are some "neurological" forms (headache, anosmia, agueusia, dizziness, without respiratory signs and with little or no fever), that are most likely the consequence of olfactory penetration of the virus into the central nervous system (mechanism described for SARS CoV-1).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Département R3S, hôpital de la pitié-salpêtrière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - adult (≥ 18 years old, unprotected);
  • for COVID-19 + patients: COVID-19 + diagnosis; with quantitative or qualitative anomalies in taste and smell; first symptoms appeared in less than 21 days
  • for healthy subjects: have never presented any sign of COVID ; confirmed by recent negative serology
  • understanding French;
  • affiliated to social security;
  • having a BMI between 20 and 30;
  • preferably non-smokers and in the event of recruitment difficulties, smokers but with smoking <5 packs - year
  • signature of the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • respiratory signs or symptoms (rhinitis, cough, shortness of breath at rest);
  • temperature above 37.5 ° C;
  • existence of a chronic respiratory pathology (including asthma and COPD in the first row);
  • pregnant women ;
  • protected minors and adults, persons deprived of their liberty;
  • not affiliated to a social security (including AME);
  • contraindication to MRI (pace maker, intracranial implants, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 15 COVID positive patients
dyspnea rating to various dyspneic stimulus
the fraction of inspired oxygen is reduced from ~21% (room air) to 14.3 and 12.7% allowing the SpO2 to decrease to ~75%, rebreathing test allowing the PCO2 to rise to 65 mmHg, inspiratory mechanical constraint with 50 to 75% of maximum inspiratory pressure
Active Comparator: 15 healthy controls
dyspnea rating to various dyspneic stimulus
the fraction of inspired oxygen is reduced from ~21% (room air) to 14.3 and 12.7% allowing the SpO2 to decrease to ~75%, rebreathing test allowing the PCO2 to rise to 65 mmHg, inspiratory mechanical constraint with 50 to 75% of maximum inspiratory pressure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity of the emotional response to hypoxic exposure (14.3 et 12.7% FIO2)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Slope of the relation between the intensity of a hypoxic stimulus to the intensity of the emotional response (visual analog scale, VAS : 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain)
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception of a hypoxic stimulus induced dyspnea (14.3 et 12.7% FIO2)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
ratings of dyspnea immediately after a hypoxic stimulus: Multidisciplinary Dyspnea Profile, MDP : 0 is no change and 10 is unbearable
5 minutes
Perception of a hypercapnic stimulus induced dyspnea (7% CO2)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
ratings of dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness during a hypercapnic stimulus (visual analog scale, VAS : 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain)
10 minutes
Perception of a hypercapnic stimulus induced dyspnea (7% CO2)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
ratings of dyspnea immediately after a hypercapnic stimulus: Multidisciplinary Dyspnea Profile, MDP : 0 is no change and 10 is unbearable
5 minutes
Perception of a inspiratory mechanical constraint induced dyspnea
Time Frame: 10 min
ratings of dyspnea intensity and unpleasantness during an inspiratory mechanical constraint (visual analog scale, VAS: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain)
10 min
Perception of a inspiratory mechanical constraint induced dyspnea
Time Frame: 5 minutes
ratings of dyspnea immediately after an inspiratory mechanical constraint induced dyspnea(Multidisciplinary Dyspnea Profile, MDP: 0 is no change and 10 is unbearable)
5 minutes
brain MRI
Time Frame: 1,5 hours
Multimodal MRI (including anatomical MRI, resting-state functional MRI)
1,5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Subscribe