- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04368949
Stepping-Up: Partnering With the Community to Prevent Early Mobility Decline (Stepping-Up)
May 9, 2023 updated by: Julie Richardson, McMaster University
Preclinical mobility limitations (PCML) manifest early in the process of declining mobility, and are not typically identified or acted upon by clinicians.
These mobility limitations manifest as changes in how daily tasks such as walking are performed (slower speed, lower endurance).
Persons in the PCML stage are at increased risk for the onset of disability and chronic disease.
Persistent deterioration in mobility is a predictor of mortality and has been reported even in the absence of changes in activities of daily living over a two-year period.
Further, older persons with mobility limitations, including reduced gait speed, are at risk for falls.
These cumulative transitions of a person's life-long mobility form their mobility trajectory and preventing mobility decline at an early stage along this trajectory is the focus of this research initiative.
This study will evaluate a novel intervention, STEPPING-UP, for improving walking ability in persons with PCML.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
249
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Susanne Sinclair, BHScPT
- Phone Number: 27810 905-525-9140
- Email: ssincla@mcmaster.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 1C7
- Recruiting
- McMaster University
-
Contact:
- Susanne Sinclair
- Email: ssincla@mcmaster.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
55 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Community-dwelling
- Age ≥55-75 years
- PCML as assessed using a questionnaire that requires respondents to self-report difficulties with their mobility (walking 2.0km). Respondents will be considered in a stage of PCML if they report no task difficulty but report modification of task performance (i.e. modify frequency, method or time to complete the task)
- Understanding of spoken and written English
- Own a laptop computer, have an email address and have internet capabilities of running the video-conferencing platform, Zoom©.
- Resident of Ontario, Canada
Exclusion Criteria:
- A score of <11 on the MoCA 5-Minute telephone screen
- Major illness that would prevent participation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Stepping-Up Group
Participants will attend one 2-hour virtual session (1-hour exercise and 1-hour SM) per week.
Each class of 6-8 participants is supervised by a Physiotherapist (PT) and kinesiologist who will individually tailor the exercises for each participant.
|
The intervention group will receive STEPPING-UP, a virtual 12-week, multicomponent intervention that includes tailored task-oriented motor learning exercise and a mobility self-management (SM) program.
|
Active Comparator: TELE Group
The initial telephone session will be 20-30 minutes, with subsequent weekly calls will be approximately 10 minutes.
|
The participants assigned to this group will receive a 12-week Telephone-Based Coaching Walking Program (TELE) delivered by a PT who will help participants set short and long term walking goals.
|
Placebo Comparator: Chair-Based Yoga Group
Participants will attend two 1-hour virtual sessions per week to ensure this group is matched for attention to STEPPING-UP.
|
Participants assigned to this group will receive a virtual 12-week Chair-Based Yoga Program (YOGA), a group-based exercise control where participants will undertake a seated exercise program that includes: warm up, seated and standing yoga poses, cool down.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Walking speed
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The 4-Metre Gait Speed Test (4MGS) is a performance-based measure of walking speed.
The 4MGS test will be performed from a standing start at both a self-selected (usual) and fastest walking speed.
|
Baseline
|
Change in walking speed from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The 4-Metre Gait Speed Test (4MGS) is a performance-based measure of walking speed.
The 4MGS test will be performed from a standing start at both a self-selected (usual) and fastest walking speed.
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in walking speed from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The 4-Metre Gait Speed Test (4MGS) is a performance-based measure of walking speed.
The 4MGS test will be performed from a standing start at both a self-selected (usual) and fastest walking speed.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in walking speed from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
The 4-Metre Gait Speed Test (4MGS) is a performance-based measure of walking speed.
The 4MGS test will be performed from a standing start at both a self-selected (usual) and fastest walking speed.
|
36 weeks
|
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: Baseline
|
2-Minute Step Test (TMST): The TMST is a test of exercise capacity that can be used as an alternative to a timed long-distance walking test when assessment space is limited.
Individuals are required to march in place as quickly as possible for 2 minutes while lifting their knees to a height midway between their patella and iliac crest when standing.
|
Baseline
|
Change in exercise capacity from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
2-Minute Step Test (TMST): The TMST is a test of exercise capacity that can be used as an alternative to a timed long-distance walking test when assessment space is limited.
Individuals are required to march in place as quickly as possible for 2 minutes while lifting their knees to a height midway between their patella and iliac crest when standing.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in exercise capacity from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
2-Minute Step Test (TMST): The TMST is a test of exercise capacity that can be used as an alternative to a timed long-distance walking test when assessment space is limited.
Individuals are required to march in place as quickly as possible for 2 minutes while lifting their knees to a height midway between their patella and iliac crest when standing.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in exercise capacity from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
2-Minute Step Test (TMST): The TMST is a test of exercise capacity that can be used as an alternative to a timed long-distance walking test when assessment space is limited.
Individuals are required to march in place as quickly as possible for 2 minutes while lifting their knees to a height midway between their patella and iliac crest when standing.
|
36 weeks
|
Lower body strength
Time Frame: Baseline
|
30-Second Chair Stand Test (CST): The 30-Second CST is used to assess lower body strength and power and is measured by the number of chair stand repetitions in a 30-second period.
|
Baseline
|
Change in lower body strength from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
30-Second Chair Stand Test (CST): The 30-Second CST is used to assess lower body strength and power and is measured by the number of chair stand repetitions in a 30-second period.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in lower body strength from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
30-Second Chair Stand Test (CST): The 30-Second CST is used to assess lower body strength and power and is measured by the number of chair stand repetitions in a 30-second period.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in lower body strength from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
30-Second Chair Stand Test (CST): The 30-Second CST is used to assess lower body strength and power and is measured by the number of chair stand repetitions in a 30-second period.
|
36 weeks
|
Dual task cost
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Difference in time between the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the TUG Cognitive.
|
Baseline
|
Change in dual task cost from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Difference in time between the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the TUG Cognitive.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in dual task cost from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
Difference in time between the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the TUG Cognitive.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in dual task cost from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
Difference in time between the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the TUG Cognitive.
|
36 weeks
|
Self-reported change in mobility
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Global Mobility Change Rating: A single question, ''Since your last visit, has there been any change in your mobility?''
will be asked.
The response will be made on a 11-point self-reported Likert scale: - 5 = very much worse; 0 = unchanged; 5 = very much better.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in self-reported change in mobility from basseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
Global Mobility Change Rating: A single question, ''Since your last visit, has there been any change in your mobility?''
will be asked.
The response will be made on a 11-point self-reported Likert scale: - 5 = very much worse; 0 = unchanged; 5 = very much better.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in self-reported change in mobility from basseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
Global Mobility Change Rating: A single question, ''Since your last visit, has there been any change in your mobility?''
will be asked.
The response will be made on a 11-point self-reported Likert scale: - 5 = very much worse; 0 = unchanged; 5 = very much better.
|
36 weeks
|
Balance self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale: The ABC Scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence.
Individuals are asked to rate their confidence in completing 16 common tasks without losing balance, on a scale from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence).
|
Baseline
|
Change in balance self-efficacy from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale: The ABC Scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence.
Individuals are asked to rate their confidence in completing 16 common tasks without losing balance, on a scale from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence).
|
12 weeks
|
Change in balance self-efficacy from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale: The ABC Scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence.
Individuals are asked to rate their confidence in completing 16 common tasks without losing balance, on a scale from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence).
|
24 weeks
|
Change in balance self-efficacy from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale: The ABC Scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence.
Individuals are asked to rate their confidence in completing 16 common tasks without losing balance, on a scale from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence).
|
36 weeks
|
Mobility patterns
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Life-Space Assessment (LSA): The LSA measures a person's usual pattern of mobility during a 1-month period, documenting mobility based on how far and how often a person travels and any assistance required.
|
Baseline
|
Change in mobility patterns from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Life-Space Assessment (LSA): The LSA measures a person's usual pattern of mobility during a 1-month period, documenting mobility based on how far and how often a person travels and any assistance required.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in mobility patterns from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The Life-Space Assessment (LSA): The LSA measures a person's usual pattern of mobility during a 1-month period, documenting mobility based on how far and how often a person travels and any assistance required.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in mobility patterns from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
The Life-Space Assessment (LSA): The LSA measures a person's usual pattern of mobility during a 1-month period, documenting mobility based on how far and how often a person travels and any assistance required.
|
36 weeks
|
Knowledge, skill and confidence for self-management
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Patient Activation Measure (PAM): The PAM is a 13-item measure of the patient's level of knowledge, skill and confidence for SM.
An Activation Score is calculated as the sum of the 13 items.
The Activation Score can then be converted into an Activation Level (Level 1 = low activation, Level 4 = high activation).
|
12 weeks
|
Change in knowledge, skill and confidence for self-management from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Patient Activation Measure (PAM): The PAM is a 13-item measure of the patient's level of knowledge, skill and confidence for SM.
An Activation Score is calculated as the sum of the 13 items.
The Activation Score can then be converted into an Activation Level (Level 1 = low activation, Level 4 = high activation).
|
Baseline
|
Change in knowledge, skill and confidence for self-management from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
Patient Activation Measure (PAM): The PAM is a 13-item measure of the patient's level of knowledge, skill and confidence for SM.
An Activation Score is calculated as the sum of the 13 items.
The Activation Score can then be converted into an Activation Level (Level 1 = low activation, Level 4 = high activation).
|
24 weeks
|
Change in knowledge, skill and confidence for self-management from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
Patient Activation Measure (PAM): The PAM is a 13-item measure of the patient's level of knowledge, skill and confidence for SM.
An Activation Score is calculated as the sum of the 13 items.
The Activation Score can then be converted into an Activation Level (Level 1 = low activation, Level 4 = high activation).
|
36 weeks
|
Balance
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Unipedal Stance Test (UPST): The UPST is used to assess static balance.
68 Individuals are asked to stand barefoot on the limb of their choice until they (1) use their arms (i.e., uncross arms), (2) use their raised foot (i.e., move it toward or away from the standing limb or touched the floor), (3) move the weight-bearing foot to maintain their balance (i.e., rotate foot on the ground) or (4) maintain the position for a maximum of 45 seconds.
|
Baseline
|
Change in balance from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Unipedal Stance Test (UPST): The UPST is used to assess static balance.
68 Individuals are asked to stand barefoot on the limb of their choice until they (1) use their arms (i.e., uncross arms), (2) use their raised foot (i.e., move it toward or away from the standing limb or touched the floor), (3) move the weight-bearing foot to maintain their balance (i.e., rotate foot on the ground) or (4) maintain the position for a maximum of 45 seconds.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in balance from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
Unipedal Stance Test (UPST): The UPST is used to assess static balance.
68 Individuals are asked to stand barefoot on the limb of their choice until they (1) use their arms (i.e., uncross arms), (2) use their raised foot (i.e., move it toward or away from the standing limb or touched the floor), (3) move the weight-bearing foot to maintain their balance (i.e., rotate foot on the ground) or (4) maintain the position for a maximum of 45 seconds.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in balance from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
Unipedal Stance Test (UPST): The UPST is used to assess static balance.
68 Individuals are asked to stand barefoot on the limb of their choice until they (1) use their arms (i.e., uncross arms), (2) use their raised foot (i.e., move it toward or away from the standing limb or touched the floor), (3) move the weight-bearing foot to maintain their balance (i.e., rotate foot on the ground) or (4) maintain the position for a maximum of 45 seconds.
|
36 weeks
|
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline
|
EQ-5D-5L is a generic utility-based health related quality of life questionnaire.
Respondents are asked to rate 5 dimensions of their health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
The five response levels are:no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), unable to /extreme problems (5).
|
Baseline
|
Change in health-related quality of life from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
EQ-5D-5L is a generic utility-based health related quality of life questionnaire.
Respondents are asked to rate 5 dimensions of their health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
The five response levels are:no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), unable to /extreme problems (5).
|
12 weeks
|
Change in health-related quality of life from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
EQ-5D-5L is a generic utility-based health related quality of life questionnaire.
Respondents are asked to rate 5 dimensions of their health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
The five response levels are:no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), unable to /extreme problems (5).
|
24 weeks
|
Change in health-related quality of life from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
EQ-5D-5L is a generic utility-based health related quality of life questionnaire.
Respondents are asked to rate 5 dimensions of their health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
The five response levels are:no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), unable to /extreme problems (5).
|
36 weeks
|
Self-efficacy for physical activity:
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participants will be asked to rate how confident they are that they could participate in moderate intensity physical activity for 150 minutes per week using a single question on a scale of 1-10.
Higher values indicate greater self-efficacy.
|
Baseline
|
Change in self-efficacy for physical activity from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Participants will be asked to rate how confident they are that they could participate in moderate intensity physical activity for 150 minutes per week using a single question on a scale of 1-10.
Higher values indicate greater self-efficacy.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in self-efficacy for physical activity from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
Participants will be asked to rate how confident they are that they could participate in moderate intensity physical activity for 150 minutes per week using a single question on a scale of 1-10.
Higher values indicate greater self-efficacy.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in self-efficacy for physical activity from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
Participants will be asked to rate how confident they are that they could participate in moderate intensity physical activity for 150 minutes per week using a single question on a scale of 1-10.
Higher values indicate greater self-efficacy.
|
36 weeks
|
Self-reported mobility
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Mobility Assessment Tool (MAT-sf): The MAT-sf is a video-animated tool for assessing mobility.
It consists of 10 animated video clips that assess an individuals' perceived level of proficiency in performing each task.
|
Baseline
|
Change in self-reported mobility from baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Mobility Assessment Tool (MAT-sf): The MAT-sf is a video-animated tool for assessing mobility.
It consists of 10 animated video clips that assess an individuals' perceived level of proficiency in performing each task.
|
12 weeks
|
Change in self-reported mobility from baseline
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
Mobility Assessment Tool (MAT-sf): The MAT-sf is a video-animated tool for assessing mobility.
It consists of 10 animated video clips that assess an individuals' perceived level of proficiency in performing each task.
|
24 weeks
|
Change in self-reported mobility from baseline
Time Frame: 36 weeks
|
Mobility Assessment Tool (MAT-sf): The MAT-sf is a video-animated tool for assessing mobility.
It consists of 10 animated video clips that assess an individuals' perceived level of proficiency in performing each task.
|
36 weeks
|
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: 12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: 24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Family doctor visits
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Family doctor visits
Time Frame: 12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Family doctor visits
Time Frame: 24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Specialist physician visits visits
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Specialist physician visits visits
Time Frame: 12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Specialist physician visits visits
Time Frame: 24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Medical tests or procedures
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Medical tests or procedures
Time Frame: 12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
12 weeks to 24 weeks
|
Medical tests or procedures
Time Frame: 24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Healthcare utilization data collected using self-report self-report.
|
24 weeks to 36 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Julie Richardson, PhD, McMaster University
- Principal Investigator: Ayse Kuspinar, PhD, McMaster University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 27, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
April 30, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 10, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 9, 2023
Last Verified
May 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PJT-169034
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mobility Limitation
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingOlder Adults | Limitation, MobilityCanada
-
University of North GeorgiaUnknownRelaxation; Joint | Limitation, Mobility | Relaxation; LumbosacralUnited States
-
Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire...Completed
-
Saint Joseph Mercy Health SystemTerminatedMobility LimitationsUnited States
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedAging | Mobility LimitationsUnited States
-
National Institute on Aging (NIA)Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital PM&RCompletedAging | Mobility LimitationsUnited States
-
Klinik ValensState Secretariat for Education Research and Innovation, Switzerland; Office...CompletedGeriatric Disorder | Mobility LimitationsSwitzerland
-
University of MalayaCompletedPressure Injury | Limitation, MobilityMalaysia
-
McGill UniversityRichard and Edith Strauss Foundation of CanadaCompletedSeniors With Mobility LimitationsCanada
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Stepping-Up
-
University of MichiganNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Robert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Obesity | Type 2 Diabetes
-
Medical Research Council, South AfricaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedStepping Stones Program for Preventing HIV Infection in Residents of Rural South African CommunitiesHIV InfectionsSouth Africa
-
National Yang Ming UniversityUnknown
-
San Diego State UniversityRecruiting
-
Khon Kaen UniversityCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesThailand
-
Khon Kaen UniversityCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesThailand
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Science Council, TaiwanCompletedSleep Apnea Syndrome
-
Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-PelasciniCompletedAcquired Brain Injury | Critical Illness PolyneuropathyItaly
-
New York Institute of TechnologyRecruitingPhysical Therapy | Rehabilitation ExerciseUnited States