Postoperative Pain Results According to Pressure to Form Pneumoperitoneum

May 18, 2020 updated by: Taeho Hong, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

A Comparison of Postoperative Pain Results According to Pressure to Form Pneumoperitoneum During Robot-assisted Single-port Cholecystectomy; a Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study showed the difference in postoperative pain between the groups that performed surgery with the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and the group that performed surgery in the standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum when robotic single-hole cholecystectomy was performed.

The primary purpose of the study was to compare the differences in the visual analog scale (VAS) between the two groups and to demonstrate the effectiveness of pain relief after surgery.

Secondly, the effect of the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on the patient's postoperative recovery and outcome was compared with the control group by comparing the length of stay, operation time, and postoperative complications.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was the most common treatment method for gallbladder-related diseases, and robotic cholecystectomy was also currently being performed. Many patients complained pain around the wound, shoulder and back after surgery. Several methods had been attempted to reduce postoperative pain, previous studies showed that oral medications such as NSAIDS, administration of local anesthetics in wounds and abdominal cavity, low-pressure penumoperitoneum, humidification of intraperitoneal washing fluid, And active residual gas suction in the abdominal cavity had been found to relieve postoperative pain.

Robotic cholecystectomy, similar to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, also formed pneumoperitoneum to secure the surgical space during operation. Based on the results published in various studies, it had known that the most effective method of pain relief for laparoscopic pain was to create low-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

In this study, investigators attempted to prove the effectiveness of low pressure pneumoperioneum through a prospective randomized controlled trial between the experimental group with the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and the control group with the standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum during robotic single-hole cholecystectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Seocho-gu, Banopo-dong
      • Seoul, Seocho-gu, Banopo-dong, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • Department of HBP Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients who underwent elective gallbladder surgery

  • Cholelithiasis
  • Chronic cholecystitis
  • Gallbladder polyps
  • Gallbladder adenoma
  • Porcelain gallbladder

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute cholecystitis patient group

    • Necrotic gallbladder
    • Collapsed gallbladder
    • Gallbladder pustosis
    • Gallbladder emphysema
    • Hemorrhagic gallbladder
    • Perforated gallbladder
  2. cholecystitis with a gallbladder thickness of 4 mm or more on CT or ultrasound
  3. cholecystitis with adhesions to surrounding organs due to inflammation of the gallbladder
  4. Patient group performing surgery concurrently due to other organ diseases
  5. Immunosuppressive patient group

    • Transplant patient group: Liver transplant patient group (PSLT), Kidney transplant patient group (PSKT)
    • AIDS patients group
  6. Patient group with history of open abdominal surgery
  7. Transplant group during open surgery
  8. Patients under 19 years of age.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during surgery

A. Inclusion criteria Patients who underwent elective gallbladder surgery

  • Cholelithiasis
  • Chronic cholecystitis
  • Gallbladder polyps
  • Gallbladder adenoma
  • Porcelain gallbladder

The experimental group controls the CO2 flow that is injected into the abdominal cavity during surgery and maintains the pressure in the abdominal cavity at a low level of 5 mmHg to perform the surgery.

  1. Local anesthetic administration during wound incision In the experimental group and the control group, a local anesthetic was administered to the wound surface when a glove port was installed on the navel at the start of surgery. (bupivacaine 0.5% 14ml subcutaneous injection)
  2. Residual gas aspiration
  3. Pulmonary recruitment maneuver In both the experimental group and the control group, before the operation was completed and the wound was closed, the patient was taken to the Trenedelenburg position, and then the pressure of 60 cm H2o in the abdomen was applied, and manual inflation was performed twice, 5 seconds at a time, and pulmonary recruitment was performed.
  4. Warming of the washing solution in the abdominal cavity
Experimental: the standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum during surgery

A. Inclusion criteria Patients who underwent elective gallbladder surgery

  • Cholelithiasis
  • Chronic cholecystitis
  • Gallbladder polyps
  • Gallbladder adenoma
  • Porcelain gallbladder

In the case of the control group, surgery is performed while maintaining the pressure in the abdominal cavity at 12 mmHg as generally performed during surgery.

  1. Local anesthetic administration during wound incision In the experimental group and the control group, a local anesthetic was administered to the wound surface when a glove port was installed on the navel at the start of surgery. (bupivacaine 0.5% 14ml subcutaneous injection)
  2. Residual gas aspiration
  3. Pulmonary recruitment maneuver In both the experimental group and the control group, before the operation was completed and the wound was closed, the patient was taken to the Trenedelenburg position, and then the pressure of 60 cm H2o in the abdomen was applied, and manual inflation was performed twice, 5 seconds at a time, and pulmonary recruitment was performed.
  4. Warming of the washing solution in the abdominal cavity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Score(VAS)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' and 'pain as bad as it could be'. The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative complication
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
postoperative complication : bile leakage, atelectasis, pneumonia, wound infection, bleeding, etc..
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
hospital stay
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
hospital stay(days) : The duration between the operation day and the day of discharge
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
operation time
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
operation time(minutes)
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Won jong Kim, MD, The Catholic University of Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on robotic single port cholecystectomy

3
Subscribe