- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04426695
Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Anti-Spike (S) SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for Hospitalized Adult Patients With COVID-19
January 25, 2023 updated by: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
A Master Protocol Assessing the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Anti-Spike (S) SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19
The primary objectives are:
Pooled Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A)
- To evaluate the virologic efficacy of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo in reducing viral load of SARS-CoV-2
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo, as measured by death or mechanical ventilation
Phase 1/2 (Cohort 1)
- To exclude futility of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo, as measured by death or mechanical ventilation
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of REGN10933+REGN10987 compared to placebo
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
2252
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 02401- 400
- Regeneron Study Site
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 04012-909
- Regeneron Study Site
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 05403-010
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Bahia
-
Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 40170-130
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Ceara
-
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, 60160-230
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Paraná
-
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, 80810-040
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
RS
-
Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, 99010-170
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Rio Grande Do Sul
-
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90610-000
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Santa Catarina
-
Chapeco, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 89801-355
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Criciuma, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 88811-508
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Sao Paolo
-
Botucatu, Sao Paolo, Brazil, 18618-686
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Campinas, Sao Paolo, Brazil, 13060-080
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
-
-
-
Santiago de Chile, Chile, 7500691
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Santiago De Chile
-
Las Condes, Santiago De Chile, Chile, 7591047
- Regeneron Study Site 1
-
Las Condes, Santiago De Chile, Chile, 7591047
- Regeneron Study Site 2
-
Vitacura, Santiago De Chile, Chile, 7650568
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
-
-
-
Culiacan, Mexico, 80230
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Monterrey, Mexico, 64060
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Mérida, Mexico, 97000
- Regeneron Study Site 1
-
Mérida, Mexico, 97000
- Regeneron Study Site 2
-
Veracruz, Mexico, 91700
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Zapopan, Mexico, 45170
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Jalisco
-
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44340
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Nuevo Leon
-
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, 64718
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Sinaloa
-
Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, 80020
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
-
-
-
Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of, MD-2025
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bucuresti, Romania, 021105
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Arizona
-
Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
- Regeneron Study Site 1
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Mission Hills, California, United States, 91345
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Fort Pierce, Florida, United States, 34982
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Pensacola, Florida, United States, 32504
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34239
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Glenview, Illinois, United States, 60026
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Urbana, Illinois, United States, 61801
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
- Regeneron Study Site
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70122
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Missouri
-
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63017
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63104
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198-5400
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89109
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
New Jersey
-
Englewood, New Jersey, United States, 07631
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07960
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Neptune, New Jersey, United States, 07753
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Pennington, New Jersey, United States, 08534
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Summit, New Jersey, United States, 07901
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87108
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10451
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11219
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Buffalo, New York, United States, 14203
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
- Regeneron Study Site 1
-
Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
- Regeneron Study Site 2
-
Jamaica, New York, United States, 11432
- Regeneron Study Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Regeneron Study Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Regeneron Study Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10003
- Regeneron Study Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10019
- Regeneron Study Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10025
- Regeneron Study Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10037
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
- Regeneron Study Site
-
West Islip, New York, United States, 11795
- Regeneron Study Site
-
White Plains, New York, United States, 10601
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27408
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43215
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45409
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
South Dakota
-
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57108
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Texas
-
Amarillo, Texas, United States, 79106
- Regeneron Study Site 1
-
Amarillo, Texas, United States, 79106
- Regeneron Study Site 2
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77004
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77024
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Lubbock, Texas, United States, 79410
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Sugar Land, Texas, United States, 77479
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Tyler, Texas, United States, 75701
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Utah
-
Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84143
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Washington
-
Everett, Washington, United States, 98201
- Regeneron Study Site
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
- Regeneron Study Site 1
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
- Regeneron Study Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Has SARS-CoV-2-positive antigen or molecular diagnostic test (by validated SARS-CoV-2 antigen, RT-PCR, or other molecular diagnostic assay, using an appropriate sample such as NP, nasal, oropharyngeal [OP], or saliva) ≤72 hours prior to randomization and no alternative explanation for current clinical condition. A historical record of positive result from test conducted ≤72 hours prior to randomization is acceptable.
- Has symptoms consistent with COVID-19, as determined by investigator, with onset ≤10 days before randomization
Hospitalized for ≤72 hours with at least 1 of the following at randomization; patients meeting more than one criterion will be categorized in the most severely affected category:
- Cohort 1A: With COVID-19 symptoms but not requiring supplemental oxygen
- Cohort 1: Maintains O2 saturation >93% on low-flow oxygen as defined in the protocol
- Cohort 2: High-intensity oxygen therapy without mechanical ventilation as defined in the protocol
- Cohort 3: On mechanical ventilation
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Phase 1 Only: Patients maintaining O2 saturation >94% on room air
- In the opinion of the investigator, unlikely to survive for >48 hours from screening
- Receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
- Has new-onset stroke or seizure disorder during hospitalization
- Initiated on renal replacement therapy due to COVID-19
NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion / exclusion criteria apply
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: On Low-Flow Oxygen
Cohort 1 (C1): O2 saturation >93% on low-flow oxygen via nasal cannula, simple face mask, or other similar device
|
Administered intravenously (IV) single dose
Other Names:
Placebo IV Single Dose
|
Experimental: With COVID-19 symptoms but not requiring supplemental O2
Cohort 1A (C1A): With COVID-19 symptoms but not requiring supplemental oxygen
|
Administered intravenously (IV) single dose
Other Names:
Placebo IV Single Dose
|
Experimental: High O2 No Mechanical Ventilation
Cohort 2 (C2): On high-intensity oxygen (O2) therapy but not on mechanical ventilation
|
Administered intravenously (IV) single dose
Other Names:
Placebo IV Single Dose
|
Experimental: On Mechanical Ventilation
Cohort 3 (C3): On mechanical ventilation
|
Administered intravenously (IV) single dose
Other Names:
Placebo IV Single Dose
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]): Time-weighted Average (TWA) Change in Viral Load in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Samples Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 7
|
Time-weighted average daily change from Day 1 to Day 7 in viral load (log10 copies/mL), as measured by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples.
|
Day 1 to Day 7
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went on Mechanical Ventilation From Day 6 Through Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Day 6 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or went on mechanical ventilation from Day 6 through Day 29 based on high viral load mFAS were reported.
|
Day 6 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went on Mechanical Ventilation From Day 6 Through Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 6 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or went on mechanical ventilation from Day 6 through Day 29 based on seronegative mFAS were reported.
|
Day 6 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went on Mechanical Ventilation From Day 6 Through Day 29 Based on Overall mFAS
Time Frame: Day 6 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or went on mechanical ventilation from Day 6 through Day 29 based on overall FAS were reported.
|
Day 6 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went on Mechanical Ventilation From Day 1 Through Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or went on mechanical ventilation from Day 1 through Day 29 based on high viral load mFAS were reported.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went on Mechanical Ventilation From Day 1 Through Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or went on mechanical ventilation from Day 1 through Day 29 based on seronegative mFAS were reported.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went on Mechanical Ventilation From Day 1 Through Day 29 Based on Overall mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or went on mechanical ventilation from Day 1 through Day 29 based on overall mFAS were reported.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]): Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to Day 169
|
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as those that are not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the observation period.
|
Up to Day 169
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]): Number of Participants With Grade >=2 Infusion Related Reactions up to Day 4
Time Frame: Up to Day 4
|
Infusion-related reactions are defined as any relevant adverse event that occurs during the infusion or up to day 4.
The severity of adverse events (including test findings classified as adverse events) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE).
|
Up to Day 4
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]): Number of Participants With Grade >=2 Hypersensitivity Reactions Up to Day 29
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Hypersensitivity reactions are defined as any relevant adverse event that occurs during the infusion or up to study day 29.
The severity of adverse events (including test findings classified as adverse events) were graded according to NCI-CTCAE.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]): Cumulative Incidence of Death or Mechanical Ventilation Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis (Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]): Cumulative Incidence of Death or Mechanical Ventilation Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Went on Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who went on mechanical ventilation by Day 29 based on High Viral Load mFAS in pooled analysis phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Went on Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who went on mechanical ventilation at Day 29 based on Seronegative mFAS in pooled analysis phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 6 Through Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Day 6 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died from Day 6 through Day 29 based on high viral load mFAS were reported.
|
Day 6 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 6 Through Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 6 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died from Day 6 through Day 29 Based on seronegative mFAS in pooled analysis phase 3 (cohort 1) and phase 2 (cohort 1A) were reported.
|
Day 6 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 1 Through Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died from Day 1 through Day 29 based on High Viral Load mFAS in pooled analysis phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 1 Through Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died from Day 1 through Day 29 based on seronegative mFAS in pooled analysis phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Were Discharged by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who were discharged by Day 29 based on High Viral Load mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Were Discharged by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who were discharged by Day 29 based on seronegative mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Were Readmitted to Hospital Over Time Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or were readmitted to hospital over time based on High Viral Load mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A)were reported.
Readmission to hospital was based on investigator report.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Were Readmitted to Hospital by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or were readmitted to hospital at Day 29 based on seronegative mFAS in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Readmission to hospital was based on investigator report.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death (ie, Overall Survival) by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Overall Survival was defined as time interval from randomization to death.
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of death (ie, overall survival) at Day 29 from randomization based on High Viral Load mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death (ie, Overall Survival) by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Overall Survival was defined as time interval from randomization to death.
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of death (ie, overall survival) at Day 29 from randomization based on seronegative mFAS in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A)were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Number of participants with cumulative incidence of mechanical ventilation by Day 29 based on High Viral Load mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of mechanical ventilation by Day 29 based on seronegative mFAS in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death or Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of death or mechanical ventilation by Day 29 based on High Viral Load mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death or Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of death or mechanical ventilation by Day 29 based on seronegative mFAS in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Time to Discharge From Hospital Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 56
|
Time to discharge from hospital based on High Viral Load mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
Up to Day 56
|
Pooled Analysis Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Time to Discharge From Hospital Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 56
|
Time to discharge from hospital based on Seronegative mFAS in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
Up to Day 56
|
Pooled Analysis (Phases 1/2/3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohorts 1A/2/3]): Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to Day 169
|
Up to Day 169
|
|
Pooled Analysis (Phases 1/2/3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohorts 1A/2/3]): Number of Participants With Grade >=2 Infusion Related Reactions up to Day 4
Time Frame: Up to Day 4
|
Up to Day 4
|
|
Pooled Analysis (Phases 1/2/3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohorts 1A/2/3]): Number of Participants With Grade >=2 Hypersensitivity Reactions Up to Day 29
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Up to Day 29
|
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Went on Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who went on mechanical ventilation in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 6 Through Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 6 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died from Day 6 through Day 29 in phase 3 (cohort 1) and phase 2 (cohort 1A) were reported.
|
Day 6 to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 1 Through Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died from Day 1 through Day 29 in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Were Discharged by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who were discharged in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) by Day 29 were reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Were Readmitted to Hospital by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or were readmitted to hospital in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) by Day 29 were reported.
Readmission to hospital was based on investigator report.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death up to Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of death in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) up to Day 29 from randomization were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of mechanical ventilation in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) by Day 29 were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death or Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants with cumulative incidence of death or mechanical ventilation in Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A) by Day 29 were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
by Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Time to Discharge From Hospital Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 56
|
Time to discharge from hospital up to Day 56 was reported.
|
Up to Day 56
|
Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]: TWA Change From Baseline Viral Load (Seronegative mFAS) in NP Samples up to Day 11 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 11
|
TWA change from baseline in viral load up to Day 11 was calculated for each participant using the trapezoidal rule as the area under the curve for change from baseline at each time point divided by the time interval for the observation period.
TWA change from baseline viral load in NP samples through Day 11, was measured by RT-qPCR in NP swab samples was reported.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value measured prior to dosing.
Negative changes indicate improvement in viral load.
|
Day 1 to Day 11
|
Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]: TWA Change From Baseline Viral Load (Seronegative mFAS) in NP Samples up to Day 29
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
TWA change from baseline in viral load up to Day 29 was calculated for each participant using the trapezoidal rule as the area under the curve for change from baseline at each time point divided by the time interval for the observation period.
TWA change from baseline viral load in NP samples through Day 29, was measured by quantitative RT-qPCR in NP swab samples was reported.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value measured prior to dosing.
Negative changes indicate improvement in viral load.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]: Change From Baseline in Viral Load (Seronegative mFAS) as Measured by RT-qPCR in NP Swabs Over Time
Time Frame: Days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 22 and 29
|
Change from baseline in viral load as measured by RT-qPCR in NP swabs over time was reported.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value measured prior to dosing.
Negative changes indicates improvement in viral load.
|
Days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 22 and 29
|
Phase 3 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1A]: Percent Change From Baseline in Viral Load (Seronegative mFAS) as Measured by RT-qPCR in NP Swabs Over Time
Time Frame: Days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 22 and 29
|
Percent change from baseline in viral load as measured by RT-qPCR in NP swabs over time was reported.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value measured prior to dosing.
Negative changes indicates improvement in viral load.
|
Days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 22 and 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Went on Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who went on mechanical ventilation in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 6 to Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Day 6 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
Day 6 to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died From Day 1 to Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
Day 1 to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Were Discharged by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: by Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who were discharged in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) was reported.
|
by Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Percentage of Participants Who Died or Were Readmitted to Hospital Over Time Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Percentage of participants who died or were readmitted to hospital in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) over time were reported.
Readmission to hospital was based on investigator report.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death Over Time Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Cumulative Incidence of Death Over Time in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Mechanical Ventilation Over Time Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Cumulative Incidence of Mechanical Ventilation Over Time in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Cumulative Incidence of Death or Mechanical Ventilation Over Time Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Cumulative Incidence of Death or Mechanical Ventilation Over Time in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
Cumulative incidence percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Phase 3 (Cohort 1) and Phase 2 (Cohort 1A): Time to Discharge Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 56
|
Time to Discharge in phase 3 (Cohort 1) and phase 2 (Cohort 1A) were reported.
|
Up to Day 56
|
Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]): Time-weighted Average (TWA) Change in Viral Load in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Samples Over Time Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Up to Day 29
|
Time-weighted average daily change over time up to Day 29 in viral load (log10 copies/mL), as measured by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples.
|
Up to Day 29
|
Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]): Change From Baseline as Measured by RT-qPCR in NP Swabs Over Time Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 22 and 29
|
Change from baseline in viral load as measured by RT-qPCR in NP swabs over time was reported.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value measured prior to dosing.
Negative changes indicates improvement in viral load.
|
Days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 22 and 29
|
Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]: Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went On Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on Seronegative mFAS
Time Frame: Through Day 29
|
Through Day 29
|
|
Phase 1 [Cohort 1] and Phase 2 [Cohort 1]: Percentage of Participants Who Died or Went On Mechanical Ventilation by Day 29 Based on High Viral Load mFAS
Time Frame: Through Day 29
|
Through Day 29
|
|
Phase 1 [Cohort 1]: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 28 Days Post-dose (AUC0-28)
Time Frame: Up to Day 28
|
Up to Day 28
|
|
Concentration at the End of Infusion (Ceoi)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
Concentration at Day 28 (C28)
Time Frame: Day 28
|
Day 28
|
|
Immunogenicity as Measured by Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to REGN10933
Time Frame: Through Day 169
|
Through Day 169
|
|
Immunogenicity as Measured by Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to REGN10987
Time Frame: Through Day 169
|
Through Day 169
|
|
Immunogenicity as Measured by Neutralizing Antibody Status (NAb) to REGN10933
Time Frame: Through Day 57
|
Through Day 57
|
|
Immunogenicity as Measured by Neutralizing Antibody Status (NAb) to REGN10987
Time Frame: Through Day 57
|
Through Day 57
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kreuzberger N, Hirsch C, Chai KL, Tomlinson E, Khosravi Z, Popp M, Neidhardt M, Piechotta V, Salomon S, Valk SJ, Monsef I, Schmaderer C, Wood EM, So-Osman C, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2.
- Hirsch C, Park YS, Piechotta V, Chai KL, Estcourt LJ, Monsef I, Salomon S, Wood EM, So-Osman C, McQuilten Z, Spinner CD, Malin JJ, Stegemann M, Skoetz N, Kreuzberger N. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 17;6(6):CD014945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014945.pub2.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 10, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 7, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
October 22, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 10, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
June 11, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 27, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 25, 2023
Last Verified
January 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R10933-10987-COV-2066
- 2020-002537-15 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
IPD Plan Description
All Individual Patient Data (IPD) that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Individual anonymized participant data will be considered for sharing once the indication has been approved by a regulatory body, if there is legal authority to share the data and there is not a reasonable likelihood of participant re-identification
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized patient level data or aggregate study data when Regeneron has received marketing authorization from major health authorities (e.g., Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), etc) for the product and indication, has the legal authority to share the data, and has made the study results publicly available (eg, scientific publication, scientific conference, clinical trial registry).
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Informed Consent Form (ICF)
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
- Analytic Code
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on COVID-19
-
University of Roma La SapienzaQueen Mary University of London; Università degli studi di Roma Foro Italico; Bios Prevention SrlCompletedPost Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 | Post COVID-19 Condition | Long-COVID | Chronic COVID-19 SyndromeItaly
-
Yang I. PachankisActive, not recruitingCOVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Stress Syndrome | COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Reaction | COVID-19-Associated Thromboembolism | COVID-19 Post-Intensive Care Syndrome | COVID-19-Associated StrokeChina
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingPost Acute COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 | Long COVID-19United States
-
Indonesia UniversityRecruitingPost-COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Post COVID-19 Condition | Post-COVID Syndrome | Long COVID-19Indonesia
-
Erasmus Medical CenterDa Vinci Clinic; HGC RijswijkNot yet recruitingPost-COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Long Covid19 | Post COVID-19 Condition | Post-COVID Syndrome | Post COVID-19 Condition, Unspecified | Post-COVID ConditionNetherlands
-
Dr. Soetomo General HospitalIndonesia-MoH; Universitas Airlangga; Biotis Pharmaceuticals, IndonesiaRecruitingCOVID-19 Pandemic | COVID-19 Vaccines | COVID-19 Virus DiseaseIndonesia
-
University of Witten/HerdeckeInstitut für Rehabilitationsforschung NorderneyCompletedPost-COVID-19 Syndrome | Long-COVID-19 SyndromeGermany
-
Jonathann Kuo, MDActive, not recruitingSARS-CoV2 Infection | Post-COVID-19 Syndrome | Dysautonomia | Post Acute COVID-19 Syndrome | Long COVID | Long Covid19 | COVID-19 Recurrent | Post-Acute COVID-19 | Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection | Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 | Dysautonomia Like Disorder | Dysautonomia Orthostatic Hypotension Syndrome | Post... and other conditionsUnited States
-
University Hospital, Ioannina1st Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of IoanninaRecruitingCOVID-19 Pneumonia | COVID-19 Respiratory Infection | COVID-19 Pandemic | COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | COVID-19-Associated Pneumonia | COVID 19 Associated Coagulopathy | COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) | COVID-19-Associated ThromboembolismGreece
Clinical Trials on REGN10933+REGN10987 combination therapy
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsTerminatedCOVID-19United States, Mexico, Romania
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsNo longer available
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsTerminated
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHealthy ParticipantsUnited States, Moldova, Republic of, Romania
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsTerminated
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsTerminatedImmunocompromisedUnited States, Mexico
-
Regeneron PharmaceuticalsCompletedHealthy | Chronic Stable IllnessUnited States
-
Luye Pharma Group Ltd.Shang Dong Boan Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Co-sponsor)UnknownHealthy Adults