Comparison Between Fekry and Air-Q Intubating Airways as Conduit for Fibreoptic Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients

June 27, 2020 updated by: Ahmed Abdalla, Cairo University

The fibreoptic bronchoscope remains one of the most important methods of intubating patients particularly when there is difficulty with intubation.

Facilitating fiberoptic oropharyngeal intubation procedure, specific airways have been devised to push the tongue anteriorly to clear a passage for the fibrescope into the trachea.

Of these airways the Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q) (Cookgas, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Fekry Oral Intubating Airway (Ameco Technology, Cairo, Egypt).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q):

The Air-Q™ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air-Q) (Cookgas, St. Louis, MO, USA) is a SAD that was designed primarily to act as a conduit for the passage of a cuffed tracheal tube during tracheal intubation (1), Compared with the LMA, the Air-Q has a shorter silicon airway tube that allows an easy visualization of vocal cords and intubation and removal of the device after tracheal tube insertion. The device has a removable color coded connector, allows intubation through the airway tube. The device is also wider, C-curved and has an integrated bite block which makes it easier to place reinforces the tube and diminishes the need for a separate bite block, with an elevation ramp that facilitates intubation and directs the tube toward the laryngeal inlet. It also has a built-up mask for improved seal. All of these features facilitate the passage of the tracheal tube through the device and into the trachea.

Fekry airway (Oral Intubating Airway; Egyptian Patent 28118):

Several modifications of oropharyngeal airways aiming to allow facilitation of intubation and easy removal of the airway after placement of ETT.

In Fekry airway, modification of the Williams airway facilitates the airway removal after ETT insertion without need to remove the international part of the ETT (this reduce risk of ETT dislodgement during airway removal).

The modification made to the Williams airway is that the roof of the proximal cylindrical tunnel is opened from its upper part to allow one step insertion of the tube. There is no need for removal of the tube connector after tube insertion. It allows passage of the suction catheter and may allow oxygen insufflations through a catheter.

As mastering airway management in difficult cases is an essential job to anesthesiologist, we think it is important to find an easy adjunct to this hard job.

investigators hypothesized that Fekry airway could offer a better conduit to flexible fiberoptic intubation rather than the air-Q device, because it needs less experience in how to use, less intubation time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11451
        • Maha Mohamed Ismail Youssef

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥18 years old.
  • Of both sexes.
  • With American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I-ll.
  • Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring ETT placement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patient that has any documented or suspected difficult airway or neck or upper respiratory tract abnormalities, facial deformities that invalidate Ganzouri airway score.
  • Patient that has any active cardiac or chest problem and risk of aspiration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: GA (n =22)
Patients will be intubated using Air-Q airway

Both groups:

Grade 1: Split airway provides an unobstructed path for bronchoscope from mouth to glottis.

Grade 2: Tongue rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing partial obstruction to bronchoscope.

Grade 3: Epiglottis rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing partial obstruction to bronchoscope.

Grade 4: Tongue and epiglottis rest against posterior pharyngeal wall, both causing partial obstruction to bronchoscope.

Grade 5: Tongue rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing total obstruction to bronchoscope (failure).

Grade 6: Epiglottis rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing total obstruction to bronchoscope (failure)

Active Comparator: GF (n =22)
Patients will be intubated using Fekry airway

Both groups:

Grade 1: Split airway provides an unobstructed path for bronchoscope from mouth to glottis.

Grade 2: Tongue rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing partial obstruction to bronchoscope.

Grade 3: Epiglottis rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing partial obstruction to bronchoscope.

Grade 4: Tongue and epiglottis rest against posterior pharyngeal wall, both causing partial obstruction to bronchoscope.

Grade 5: Tongue rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing total obstruction to bronchoscope (failure).

Grade 6: Epiglottis rests against posterior pharyngeal wall causing total obstruction to bronchoscope (failure)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endoscopy insertion time
Time Frame: Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Time from introducing the tip of scope through the proximal end of the airway device or mouth until the visualization of carina (multiple attempts will be added to compute this time
Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ITHIN Intubation time
Time Frame: Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Timing of complete intubation
Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Grade of endoscopic view
Time Frame: Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Endoscopic view grading
Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Success rate of intubation from 1st trial
Time Frame: Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
1st trial Success
Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Score of success of endotracheal intubation
Time Frame: Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia till Study Completion
Endotracheal intubation Score of success
Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia till Study Completion
Number of intubation and device insertion attempts
Time Frame: Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Attempts Number of intubation and device insertion
Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Complications
Time Frame: Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia
Coughing, laryngospasm, stridor, hoarseness, bronchospasm, arterial desaturation (SpO2<92), aspiration, bleeding or swelling to the lips, tongue, teeth, or blood staining the airway.
Withen 15 seconds from induction og Generel Anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Randa Badawi, M.D, Cairo university
  • Principal Investigator: Maha M Ismail Youssef, M.D, Cairo university
  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed Moamen Mahmoud, M.Sc, Cairo university
  • Principal Investigator: Hany M El-Hadi Shoukat, M.D, Cairo university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N 54-2018/Ms

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Till Publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fekry VS the Air-Q Intubating Airways

Clinical Trials on Patients will be intubated using Air-Q airway

Subscribe