Comparison of the Efficacy of Acupressure P6 Point, Dexamethasone and Ondansetron Versus Palonosetron Monotherapy for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgery

July 13, 2020 updated by: Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan, MBBS
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is defined as nausea and/or vomiting occurring within 24 hours after surgery, it commonly affects 20-30% patients but as high as 70-80% patients who are deemed high risk for PONV may be affected. PONV may cause unpleasant complications such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, suture dehiscence, aspiration of gastric contents, delayed recovery and prolonged hospital stay. Standard guideline recommended combination of anti-emetics to prevent PONV in high risk patients. The commonly used agents are dexamethasone and ondansetron which are cheaper although they are proven to be less effective as single agent when compared with newer agent such as palonosetron. As an adjunct or alternative to pharmacological treatment, acupressure P6 point has gained increasing attention for its possible value in preventing PONV. It is proven that acupressure reduced the incidences of PONV when combined with pharmacological treatment. It is postulated that acupressure active Aβ and Aδ fibres and stimulate the release of β-endorphine from hypothalamus. In addition, it is believed that acupressure might act on dopaminergic, serotonergic and norepinerphrinergic fibres which might has a role in PONV prevention.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is designed to compare the efficacy of palonosetron monotherapy versus combination of acupressure P6 point with dexamethasone and ondansetron in preventing PONV. It has been proven that palonosetron is more superior as single agent when compared with acupressure, dexamethasone and ondansetron separately. However, this might not be cost effective as palonosetron is more expensive than the other agents. In addition, the combination therapy has been reported better in preventing PONV when compared with monotherapy. The investigators need to investigate whether the combination of acupressure with dexamethasone and ondansetron exert an effect equal or even better than palonosetron monotherapy. The investigators hypothesis is the combination of acupressure P6 point with dexamethasone and ondansetron provide better prophylaxis againts PONV when compared with palonosetron. The requirement for rescue anti-emetics for combination of acupressure P6 point with dexamethasone and ondansetron group is lesser than palonosetron.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kelantan
      • Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia, 16150
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan, MBBS
        • Contact:
          • Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan, MBBS
          • Phone Number: 6104 +6097673000
          • Email: zulfakar@usm.my
        • Contact:
          • Phone Number: +60129091447
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Woei Zhong Chiong, MBBS
      • Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia, 16150
        • Recruiting
        • Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan
        • Contact:
          • Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan, MBBS
          • Phone Number: 6104 +60129091447
          • Email: zulfakar@usm.my
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zhong Woei Chiong, MBBS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA I or II female patients aged 18 - 65 years old in view female patients are at higher risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
  2. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
  3. High risk for PONV (APFEL score 3-4).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with known allergic to dexamethasone, ondansetron and wristband.
  2. Patients who take anti-emetic, emetogenic drugs and glucocorticoids within 24 hours before surgery.
  3. Patients with upper limb disability which affect the application of wristband.
  4. Obese patients with BMI > 35 in view acupressure P6 wristband might be too tight to fit patient's wrist which might affect the correct placement of pressure point.
  5. Pre-existing vertigo

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I

Group I (n=45)

  1. Acupressure wristband
  2. IV Dexamethasone 8mg
  3. IV Ondansetron 4mg

Group 1 Patients with odd numbers labelled form will be Group I patients. They will receive intravenous dexamethasone 8mg during induction. Acupressure P6 wristband is applied after induction and removed prior to emergence to maintain blinding. Intravenous ondansetron 4mg is given prior to skin closure.

Group 11 Patients with even numbers labelled form will be Group II patients who will receive intravenous palonosetron 0.075mg during induction.

Active Comparator: Group II

Group II (n=45)

1. IV Palonosetron 0.075mg

Group 1 Patients with odd numbers labelled form will be Group I patients. They will receive intravenous dexamethasone 8mg during induction. Acupressure P6 wristband is applied after induction and removed prior to emergence to maintain blinding. Intravenous ondansetron 4mg is given prior to skin closure.

Group 11 Patients with even numbers labelled form will be Group II patients who will receive intravenous palonosetron 0.075mg during induction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting immediately, at
Time Frame: Hours 6, postoperative.
Hours 6, postoperative.
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting immediately, at
Time Frame: Hours 12, postoperative
Hours 12, postoperative
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting immediately, at
Time Frame: Hours 24, postoperative
Hours 24, postoperative
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting immediately, at
Time Frame: Hours 48, postoperative
Hours 48, postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportion of patients require rescue anti-emetics immediately,
Time Frame: at Hours 6, postoperative.
at Hours 6, postoperative.
The proportion of patients require rescue anti-emetics immediately,
Time Frame: Hours 12, postoperative.
Hours 12, postoperative.
The proportion of patients require rescue anti-emetics immediately,
Time Frame: Hours 24, postoperative.
Hours 24, postoperative.
The proportion of patients require rescue anti-emetics immediately,
Time Frame: Hours 48, postoperative.
Hours 48, postoperative.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Palonosetron

Clinical Trials on Acupressure wristband and Palanosetron

3
Subscribe