Endorphin at Labor Pain and Acupressure

April 28, 2020 updated by: Serap ÖZTÜRK ALTINAYAK, Serap Ozturk Altinayak

The Impact of Different Acupressure Procedures Performed on the Hand During Labor on Endorphin Levels and Labor Pain Perception: A Randomised Controlled Trial

This study was performed to determine the impact of different acupressure procedures, performed on women's hands during labor, on endorphin levels and labor pain perception.

The sample consisted of 140 pregnant women. The study was conducted with three experimental groups and one control group, each including 35 pregnant women. Conventional acupressure and warm and cold acupressure procedures were performed on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point of the experimental group. No procedures were performed on the women in the control group. Data were collected using a "Personal Information Form", "Labor Intervention Follow-up Form", "Visual Analog Scale" and "Verbal Category Scale".

The comparison between the experimental and control groups indicated that the conventional acupressure procedure was effective in reducing labor pain and that the warm acupressure procedure increased endorphin levels.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokat, Turkey
        • Health Research and Training Hospital of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a primipara
  • Having intact membranes
  • No skin diseases (such as urticaria...),
  • No use of narcotic drugs
  • Having a term pregnancy
  • Having a single fetus at vertex position
  • Planning to have vaginal delivery
  • Having contractions and ongoing regular augmentation
  • Having recent augmentation starting periods
  • Being in the latent phase (0-3 cm dilatation)
  • Having no history of high-risk pregnancy
  • Not using analgesic drugs to reduce pain during delivery
  • Having no systemic and neurologic diseases
  • Having no contraction anomaly (hypotonic or hypertonic contractions)

Exclusion Criteria:

Having any of the above criteria.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Warm Acupressure Procedure Group

Latent phase Visual Analog Scale and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase The first warm acupressure procedure was performed for ten minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated three more times at one-hour intervals.

Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second warm acupressure procedure was performed three times at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken

Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
Experimental: Cold Acupressure Procedure Group

Latent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase The first cold acupressure procedure was performed for ten minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated three more times at one-hour intervals.

Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second cold acupressure procedure was performed three times at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken

Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
Experimental: Conventional Acupressure Group

Latent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase Conventional acupressure was performed for 30 minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated twice more at one-hour intervals.

Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second conventional acupressure procedure was performed twice at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken

Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
No Intervention: Control Group

Latent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous sample taken Active phase

No procedure other than the routine clinical practices were carried out. Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase No procedure other than the normal clinical routines was conducted Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed. Second venous blood sample taken

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
labor pain
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1month
pain scale
through study completion, an average of 1month
endorphin levels
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1month
physiological parameter
through study completion, an average of 1month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hava Özkan, PhD, Atatürk University Faculty of Health Science, Department of Midwifery,

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25.09.2018-04/2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

I want it published in a journal first.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on Warm Acupressure, Cold Acupressure , Conventional Acupressure

3
Subscribe