Remote Pulmonary Function Testing and Nurse Coaching in ALS

July 15, 2024 updated by: Zachary Simmons, MD, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Remote Pulmonary Function Testing and Nurse Respiratory Health Coaching in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Comparison of respiratory outcomes in patients receiving telemedicine-guided remote pulmonary function testing (rPFT) with or without the additional support of nurse coaching. This is a randomized controlled study which assesses the effects rPFT and coaching on respiratory outcomes and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a two-arm, randomized study to determine 1) whether weekly monitoring of respiratory function can lead to timelier initiation of NIV and 2) whether structured nurse coaching leads to improved self-efficacy for managing disease and better maintenance of respiratory health. For enrollees in both arms, standard FVC and MIP measurements obtained approximately every three months by the respiratory therapist during ALS Clinic are supplemented with self-administered rPFTs performed weekly. Enrollees in the rPFT+NRHC (nurse respiratory health coaching) arm will additionally receive monthly coaching with the study nurse via telehealth. Outcomes include measures of quality of life and self-efficacy for managing disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Hershey Medical Center ALS Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients:

  1. Possess a diagnosis of definite, probable, probable laboratory-supported, or possible ALS by revised El Escorial research criteria [Brooks2000].
  2. Be 18 years of age or older.
  3. Have a caregiver available to participate in the study
  4. Symptom onset within the last three years.
  5. Have a computer and home internet service sufficient for engaging in telemedicine sessions.
  6. Have a second device capable of downloading the spirometer application from an app store (Android- or iOS-based smartphone or tablet).

Caregivers:

  1. Be 18 years of age or older, of either gender.
  2. Be able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients:

  1. Use of NIV or diaphragm pacer at time of obtaining informed consent.
  2. FVC ≤50% predicted or MIP > -60 cm of water.
  3. ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) [Cedarbaum1999] score on day of screening of ≥2 on items for speech, swallowing, and salivation. These items are indicators of bulbar dysfunction, which limits the reliability of PFT administration.
  4. Cognitive impairment, as judged by the ALS clinic neurologist, that prevents participation in the study.

Caregivers: None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: remote PFT (rPFT) longitudinal
Subjects will undergo standard pulmonary function testing as part of standard clinical procedure. They will also undergo weekly remote pulmonary function testing using the telemedicine interface and study equipment.
Telemedicine delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Standard clinical delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Experimental: remote PFT (rPFT) + Nurse Coaching longitudinal
Subjects will undergo standard pulmonary function testing as part of standard clinical procedure. They will also undergo weekly remote pulmonary function testing using the telemedicine interface and study equipment, and receive monthly coaching from an ALS nurse.
Telemedicine delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Standard clinical delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Nurse Respiratory Health Coaching - The NRHC intervention follows the "teamlet" model described by Bennett et al. [Bennett2010], made up of the research coordinator who performs respiratory testing, and the nurse practitioner who coaches using the GROW (goals, realities, options, wrap-up) model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Date of Identification of Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Need From rPFT Monitoring
Time Frame: 1 year
NIV is typically prescribed when an individual demonstrates signs of respiratory failure. In this study, forced vital capacity (FVC) of 50% or less of the predicted value serves as a surrogate for respiratory failure and constitutes identification of NIV need. First date of remote measurement of FVC 50% or less of the predicted value is reported here.
1 year
Date of Identification of NIV Need From Standard PFT Monitoring
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until first identification of non-invasive ventilation need, assessed up to 1.5 years
NIV is typically prescribed when an individual demonstrates signs of respiratory failure. In this study, forced vital capacity (FVC) of 50% or less of the predicted value serves as a surrogate for respiratory failure and constitutes identification of NIV need. First date of standard, in-clinic measurement of FVC 50% or less of the predicted value is reported here.
From date of enrollment until first identification of non-invasive ventilation need, assessed up to 1.5 years
Self-efficacy for Managing Medications and Treatments
Time Frame: 1 year
The self-efficacy assessment contains questions from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) item banks on Self-Efficacy for Managing Medications and Treatments (4 items). Cumulative T-scores from each test bank were reported at months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12, with a mean score of 50±10, higher numbers indicating greater self-efficacy. The reported value is the slope of regression of self-efficacy on time, in T-score points per month.
1 year
Self-efficacy for Managing Social Interactions
Time Frame: 1 year
The self-efficacy assessment contains questions from the PROMIS item bank on Self-Efficacy for Managing Social Interactions (5 items). Cumulative T-scores from each test bank were reported at months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12, with a mean score of 50±10, higher numbers indicating greater self-efficacy. The reported value is the slope of regression of self-efficacy on time, in T-score points per month.
1 year
Self-efficacy for Managing Symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year
The self-efficacy assessment contains questions from the PROMIS item bank on Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms (9 items). Cumulative T-scores from each test bank were reported at months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12, with a mean score of 50±10, higher numbers indicating greater self-efficacy. The reported value is the slope of regression of self-efficacy on time, in T-score points per month.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rPFT Adherence
Time Frame: 1 year
Participant adherence to rPFT protocol, defined as the percentage of eligible weeks with a submitted rPFT report.
1 year
Dyspnea Characteristics
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pool v1.0 - Dyspnea Characteristics (5 items), which uses Likert-type scaling that are summed to a total score. Participants complete this questionnaire each month (12 total administrations). Total score range 0-44, with higher numbers indicating more severe dyspnea. The reported value is the slope of regression of total score on time, in point change per month.
1 year
Respiratory-related Symptoms
Time Frame: 1 year
Subjects were asked to report whether they experienced the following symptoms in the past month during each month on the study (12 administrations): excessive secretions, drooling, choking on secretions, morning headache. Reported value is the sum of experienced symptoms (0-4) summed over 12 months. Participants could experience none of these symptoms (0) up to experiencing all symptoms each month (48).
1 year
Dyspnea Functional Limitations
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 - Dyspnea Functional Limitations - Short Form 10a (10 items), which uses Likert-type scaling that are summed to a total score. Participants complete this questionnaire each month (12 total administrations). Total score range 0-30, with higher numbers indicating more functional limitations due to dyspnea. The reported value is the slope of regression of total score on time, in point change per month.
1 year
Sleep Related Impairment
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.0 - Sleep Related Impairment - Short Form 8a (8 items), which uses Likert-type scaling that are summed to a total score. Participants complete this questionnaire each month (12 total administrations). Total score range 8-40, with higher numbers indicating more sleep-related impairment. The reported value is the slope of regression of total score on time, in point change per month.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00006924part2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan at this time to share data with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ALS

Clinical Trials on remote pulmonary function testing

Subscribe