Saliva Substitute Mouthwash in NPC Survivors With Xerostomia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the highest reported otorhinolaryngological malignancy reported in Malaysia affecting predominantly male adults between 40-60 years old [1, 2]. Radiation therapy (RT) has been coined as the mainstay treatment owing to its' radiosensitive properties [1, 3]. Radiation-induced DNA damage impairs proper cell division, resulting in cell death or senescence of cells that attempt to divide, particularly useful in killing malignant cells. However, radiation doses to the salivary glands cause loss of saliva producing acinar cells which ultimately hampers production of saliva in NPC patients post radiation [4]. This leads to progressive loss of salivary gland function causing xerostomia symptoms [5]. This study aims to compare the effects of two mouthwashes in the treatment of xerostomia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Xerostomia, or dry mouth caused by reduced or absent saliva flow, is a subjective symptom that can lead to impaired chewing, swallowing, altered sense of taste and speech. This eventually affects their nutritional status and quality of life. The reported prevalence of xerostomia in NPC survivors ranged from 80% -100% [6-9]. This high prevalence has stemmed a lot of interest in prevention and treatment of this important sequelae. Saliva substitute in the forms of gels, toothpaste, sprays or mouthwash has been used for treatment of xerostomia [10]. Oral7® mouthwash (Oral7 International, United Kingdom) is a mucin-based saliva substitute formulated with natural enzymes such as lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, glucose oxidase and lactoferrin, similar to naturally occuring saliva. The biophysical properties of the mouthwash can potentially provide relief to xerostomia symptoms in patients post radiotherapy translating to a better quality of life. Hence, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effects of saliva substitute in treating xerostomia among NPC patients post radiotherapy. The primary end-point of the study was to compare the subjective xerostomia symptoms, measured using a validated inventory taken 4 weeks following intervention and at baseline between patients who did not receive and patients who received Oral7® mouthwash. The secondary end-point was to demonstrate similar changes in objective measurements using sialometry techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kuala Lumpur
      • Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 56000
        • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have completed radiation therapy or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (clinical staging of tumour based on AJCC staging (8th edition) T1-4, N0-3, M0).
  • Patients age 20 years old to 85 years old.
  • Two months has elapsed since last dose of chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Karnofsky performance score more than 70%.
  • Patients complaining of xerostomia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those contraindicated to using mouthwash (established allergy to lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, glucose oxidase lactoferrin, cetylpyridinium chloride and xylitol)
  • Patients with residual or recurrent disease.
  • Patients who received intensity modulated radiation therapy.
  • Patients with ongoing oral mucositis (WHO Oral Mucositis grading I to IV)
  • Patients with facial, glossopharyngeal. vagus and hypoglossal nerve palsy/ paresis.
  • Patients who had any form of concurrent treatment protocols (hormonal, alternative, antiviral, sialogogues or photodynamic therapy) during the study duration.
  • Patients with autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and Sjớgren syndrome.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional
4 weeks use of mucin-based saliva substitute
structured interview by a dedicated researcher to obtain a score of the summated xerostomia inventory (SXI)
unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) flow measurement
Placebo Comparator: Control
4 weeks use of xylitol-based mouthwash
structured interview by a dedicated researcher to obtain a score of the summated xerostomia inventory (SXI)
unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) flow measurement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
summated xerostomia inventory (SXI) score
Time Frame: 4 weeks
summated xerostomia inventory (SXI) score at baseline-summated xerostomia inventory (SXI) score at 4 weeks post intervention
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) flow
Time Frame: 4 weeks
unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) flow at 4 weeks post intervention -unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) flow at baseline
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mawaddah Azman, MS, National University of Malaysia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be shared upon publication of the research

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Xerostomia, Hyposalivation, Saliva Substitute, Radiation-induced Toxicity, Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Summated Xerostomia Inventory

Subscribe