Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab (CD14152) in Participants With Prurigo Nodularis (PN)

July 4, 2024 updated by: Galderma R&D

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab (CD14152) in Subjects With Prurigo Nodularis

The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of nemolizumab (CD14152) compared to placebo in participants greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years of age with prurigo nodularis (PN) after a 16 week treatment period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

286

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8036
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Linz, Austria, 4020
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Wien, Austria, 1220
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • AL
      • Calgary, AL, Canada, T3E OB2
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3H7
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7K OH6
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Augsburg, Germany, 86179
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Bad Bentheim, Germany, 48455
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Bonn, Germany, 53105
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Darmstadt, Germany, 64283
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Eppendorf, Germany, 20246
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Göttingen, Germany, 37075
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Halle, Germany, 06120
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20537
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69115
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Lübeck, Germany, 23538
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Münich, Germany, 80337
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Münich, Germany, 80802
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Oldenburg, Germany, 26133
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Würzburg, Germany, 97080
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1036
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Gyula, Hungary, 5700
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Kecskemét, Hungary, 6000
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Szeged, Hungary, 6720
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Szolnok, Hungary, 5000
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Zalaegerszeg, Hungary, 8900
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Catania, Italy, 95123
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Chieti, Italy, 66100
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Genova, Italy, 16132
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • L'Aquila, Italy, 67100
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Modena, Italy, 41124
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Napoli, Italy, 80131
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Parma, Italy, 43126
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Perugia, Italy, 06129
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Roma, Italy, 00144
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Roma, Italy, 00168
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Vicenza, Italy, 24128
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Czestochowa, Poland, 42-202
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Gdańsk, Poland, 80-382
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Gdynia, Poland, 81-537
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-040
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Poznań, Poland, 60-702
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Rzeszów, Poland, 30-055
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 01-192
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Wrocław, Poland, 50-381
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Łódź, Poland, 90-127
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Solna, Sweden, 17176
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Dudley, United Kingdom, DY1 2HQ
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G3 8SJ
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35244
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90045
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95815
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92121
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92130
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 94404
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States, 33484
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Hollywood, Florida, United States, 33021
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Largo, Florida, United States, 33770
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33028
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33607
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Georgia
      • Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31904
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Macon, Georgia, United States, 31217
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60613
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Lake Bluff, Illinois, United States, 60044
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Kansas
      • Topeka, Kansas, United States, 66614
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Missouri
      • Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States, 64506
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27617
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Norman, Oklahoma, United States, 73071
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Rhode Island
      • Johnston, Rhode Island, United States, 02919
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37909
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78738
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Bellaire, Texas, United States, 77401
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Laredo, Texas, United States, 78401
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84117
        • Galderma Investigational Site
      • Springville, Utah, United States, 84663
        • Galderma Investigational Site
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Galderma Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of PN for at least 6 months with: Pruriginous nodular lesions on upper limbs, trunk, and/or lower limbs, at least 20 nodules on the entire body with a bilateral distribution and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score more than equal to (>=) 3 (based on the IGA scale ranging from 0 to 4, in which 3 was moderate and 4 is severe) at both the screening and baseline visits.
  • Severe pruritus was defined as follows on the PP NRS:

    1. At the screening visit (Visit 1): PP NRS score was >= 7.0 for the 24-hour period immediately preceding the screening visit.
    2. At the baseline visit (Visit 2): Mean of the daily intensity of the PP NRS score was >= 7.0 over the previous week.
  • Female participants of childbearing potential (that is [i.e,], fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile) must agree to use at least 1 adequate and approved method of contraception throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study drug injection.
  • Participant was willing and able to comply with all of the time commitments and procedural requirements of the clinical study protocol, including daily diary recordings by the participant using an electronic handheld device provided for this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body weight less than < 30 kg.
  • Chronic pruritus resulting from another active condition other than PN, such as but not limited to scabies, lichen simplex chronicus, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, acne, folliculitis, lichen planus, habitual picking/excoriation disorder, sporotrichosis, bullous autoimmune disease, end-stage renal disease, or cholestatic liver disease (example [e.g.] primary biliary cirrhosis) or diabetes mellitus or thyroid disease that is not adequately treated, as per standard of care.
  • Unilateral lesions of prurigo (e.g., only one arm affected).
  • History of or current confounding skin condition (e.g., Netherton syndrome, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome], chronic actinic dermatitis, dermatitis herpetiformis).
  • Participants with a current medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic bronchitis.
  • Neuropathic and psychogenic pruritus such as but not limited to notalgia paresthetica, brachioradial pruritus, small fiber neuropathy, skin picking syndrome, or delusional parasitosis.
  • Requiring rescue therapy for PN during the screening period or expected to require rescue therapy within 4 weeks following the baseline visit.
  • Positive serology results (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] or hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb], hepatitis C (HCV) antibody with positive confirmatory test for HCV (e.g., polymerase chain reaction [PCR]), or human immunodeficiency virus antibody) at the screening visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants weighing < 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Participants weighing >= 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.
Participants received matching placebo as SC injection.
Experimental: Nemolizumab
Participants weighing less than (<) 90 kilogram (kg) received two subcutaneous (SC) injections of 30 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W). Participants weighing greater than or equal to (>=) 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.
Participants received either 30 mg or 60 mg dose of nemolizumab as SC injection.
Other Names:
  • CD14152

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With an Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as the average of 7 consecutive days of data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing if less than 4 days of data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responders.
Baseline, Week 16
Number of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
IGA success is defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1), and a reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 2 points at week 16. Full scale is scored from 0-4, higher score indicates more severe symptoms. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responders.
Baseline, Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline up to end of treatment period (24 weeks)
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs occurring after the first administration of the study drug until the last study visit. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence, in the view of either the Investigator or Sponsor, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. AESI was a noteworthy TEAE for the study drug that was to be monitored closely and reported promptly. Relatedness to study drug was based on Investigator's discretion. Analysis was performed on safety population which included all randomised participants who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
From Baseline up to end of treatment period (24 weeks)
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responders.
Baseline, Week 4
Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to week 16, as described in the SAP. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responders.
Week 16
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
The SD NRS is a scale to report the degree of participant sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to 10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responders.
Baseline, Week 16
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in SD NRS at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
SD NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responde
Baseline, Week 4
Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4
The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responders.
Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RD.06.SPR.202685
  • 2019-004293-25 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized data sets from which results presented are derived.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data availability will begin 6 months after approval of the indication by a regulatory body.

Data availability will end 5 years from publication of the primary study results article.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available to qualified science and medical researchers upon formal request and submission of research proposal detailing planned analyses. Proposals should be directed to clinical.studies@galderma.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prurigo Nodularis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe