Effect of Duration of Symptoms on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy

September 1, 2020 updated by: Sherwan Ahmed Ali Hamawandi, Hawler Medical University

Effect of Duration of Symptoms on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

97 patients in 3 randomized groups were treated by Microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation; Group A was operated at 6 weeks of symptoms, Group B at 3 months and group C at 6 months. These patients were followed for 3 years for the clinical and functional outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

150 patients were enrolled in this study and only 97 patients were finally analyzed for primary outcomes measures of Oswestry disability index and Roland-Morris Questionnaire and secondary outcome measures of Visual analogue scale for back pain and leg pain as well as length of hospital stay and time to return for daily activities. Assessments done at different periods of 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1year, 2 years and 3 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 47 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age more than 18 years
  • Disc herniation of L3-4, L4-5 or L5-S1
  • MRI showed disc protrusion or extrusion with nerve root compression corresponding to clinical features.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis.
  • Spinal deformity like scoliosis.
  • Previous spinal surgery or infection.
  • Cauda equina syndrome.
  • Lumbar segmental instability on dynamic radiograph: translation more than 3 mm or change in angulation more than 10 degrees
  • Smoking
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Disc herniation other than levels L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1
  • More than single level disc hernaition.
  • Body mass index 30 or more than 30
  • Contained disc herniation by MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 6 weeks
Microdiscectomy was done at 6 weeks of starting symptoms
Microscope assisted lumbar discectomy done at 6 weeks of starting symptoms
Active Comparator: 3 months
Microdiscectomy was done at 3 months of starting symptoms
Microscope assisted lumbar discectomy done at 3 months of starting symptoms
Active Comparator: 6 months
Microdiscectomy was done at 6 months of starting symptoms
Microscope assisted lumbar discectomy done at 6 months of starting symptoms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry disability index
Time Frame: Oswestry disability index was measured the functional disability at 2 weeks
Primary outcome measure for functional disability, the higher score is better function
Oswestry disability index was measured the functional disability at 2 weeks
Roland-Morris Questionnaire
Time Frame: Roland-Morris Questionnaire was measured the functional disability at 2 weeks
Primary outcome measure for functional disability, the higher score is worse function
Roland-Morris Questionnaire was measured the functional disability at 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: Visual analogue scale was measured at 2 weeks
Secondary outcome measure for back pain and leg pain, the higher score is more pain and bad results
Visual analogue scale was measured at 2 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Measuring the days of postoperative hospital stay immediately after the surgery
Secondary outcome measure of how many days patient remains in the hospital after operation
Measuring the days of postoperative hospital stay immediately after the surgery
Return to daily activities
Time Frame: Measuring the time needed t return to daily activities immediately after the surgery
Secondary outcome measure of time patient needed to return to daily activities
Measuring the time needed t return to daily activities immediately after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Microdiscectomy at 6 weeks of symptoms

Subscribe