Satellite™ PEEK Nucleus Replacement Retrospective Analysis

January 26, 2016 updated by: Medtronic Spinal and Biologics

The Satellite™ Retrospective Analysis is an international, retrospective, multi-center, non-interventional post-marketing study designed to document and analyze existing data with the device in a "real-world" setting.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate number of adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs) and serious adverse event (SAEs) and early clinical effectiveness for the Satellite™ Nucleus Replacement in a standard clinical practice. Data collection will include information on health related quality of life (QoL), physical functioning and adverse event after nucleus replacement surgery. Radiographic measures will also be assessed to evaluate changes in disc height at the operated level and changes in segmental range of motion.

All patients who were implanted with a Satellite™ Nucleus Replacement Prosthesis in the participating sites are eligible for participation in the Satellite ™ Retrospective Analysis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
        • Masaryk Hospital
      • Ružomberok, Slovakia
        • ÚVN SNP
      • Caracas, Venezuela
        • Instituto de Columna de Caracas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who were implanted with a Satellite™ Nucleus Replacement device at the participating sites are eligible for participation in the Satellite ™ Retrospective Analysis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have signed a Patient Data Release Form
  • Age of at least 18 years and skeletally mature at the time of surgery

Exclusion Criterion:

  • Patient has not reached the age of legal consent according to local laws

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Back Pain
Time Frame: Up to 12 months follow up visit
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. It is a 10 cm scale, 0cm means 'no pain' and 10cm means 'worst possible pain'. The patients mark the location corresponding to the amount of back pain they experienced on the 10cm line.
Up to 12 months follow up visit
Health-related Quality of Life Using the Visual Analogue Scale for Leg Pain
Time Frame: Up to 12 months follow up visit
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a tool widely used to measure pain. It is a 10 cm scale, 0cm means 'no pain' and 10cm means 'worst possible pain'. The patients mark the location corresponding to the amount of back pain they experienced on the 10cm line.
Up to 12 months follow up visit
Physical Functioning Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months follow up visit
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) derives from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, it is used to measure disability for low back pain. The index is scored from 0 to 50; 0 meaning 'no disability' and 50 meaning 'maximum disability'.
Up to 12 months follow up visit
Safety by Evaluating the Number of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Patients were followed up according to the local practice, up to 1 year
Patients were followed up according to the local practice, up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of Motion (ROM) at Implanted Level
Time Frame: Up to 12 months follow up visit
The range of motion (ROM) was calculated as the angle of the segment on the flexion radiograph minus the angle of the segment on the extension radiograph, expressed in degrees (absolute value).
Up to 12 months follow up visit
Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) at Implanted Level
Time Frame: Up to 12 months follow up visit
The Intervertebral Disc Space (IVD) was measured as average disc height, calculated as [(A+B)/2]/H, where A is the posterior intervertebral disc height, B is the anterior intervertebral disc height and H is the anterior height of upper vertebral body.
Up to 12 months follow up visit
Device Subsidence Measured as Interbody Height Ratio (IBHR)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months follow up visit
Interbody Height Ratio (IBHR) is calculated as the total vertical height of the two vertebral bodies directly superior and inferior to the implant divided by the anteroposterior diameter of the superior vertebral body.
Up to 12 months follow up visit
Changes in Device Placement
Time Frame: Up to 12 months follow up visit
Up to 12 months follow up visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

April 27, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar

3
Subscribe