Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique.

September 5, 2020 updated by: Mostafa Magdy Awad, Cairo University

Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The study will compare between osteotome technique and New Reverse Drilling Technique in the placement of dental implant in posterior maxilla , primary outcome will be Implant stability that will be measured by Periotest device . follow up for 6 month.

secondary outcomes will be crestal bone loss , pain and swelling.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Partially edentulous patients in the maxillary posterior region.
  2. Systemically healthy patient.
  3. Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part.
  4. Sufficient bone height and width for implant placement (bone height ≥10mm and bone width ≥6mm).
  5. Non-smoker.
  6. Patients who are ≥ 20 years old.
  7. Good oral hygiene.
  8. Acceptance of a one year follow-up period.
  9. Informed consent is provided by the patient.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with implant stability,
  2. Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest.
  3. Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene.
  4. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as alcoholism or parafunctional habits.
  5. Inadequate inter-arch space for implant prosthetic part

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: osteotome group
a technique for dental implant placement by using the osteotome to condense the bone and create an osteotome rather than cutting the bone
Experimental: New Reverse Drilling technique
a new technique of dental implant drilling that promote osseodensification by rotating the drills anti-clockwise rather than clockwise to promote bone condensation rather than bone cutting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
implant stability
Time Frame: 6 months
the stability of the dental implant when placed in the maxilla of the patient and it will be measured by periotest
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
crestal bone loss
Time Frame: 6 monthz
amount of bone loss around the implant . measured in MM with CBVT radiograph
6 monthz

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PER6-3-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant

Clinical Trials on osteotome technique

3
Subscribe