Optimising the Care and Treatment Pathways for Older Patients Facing Major Gastrointestinal Surgery. (OCTAGON)

The UK population is ageing. Whilst many people remain active and in good health as they get older, getting older is associated with the onset of many common medical conditions, as well as memory and mobility problems. There is a natural decline in heart and lung fitness with age, although this may be slowed by regular exercise and physical activity. The majority of digestive system problems that require operations (such as bowel cancer) are more common in older people. These operations can reduce an older person's ability to look after themselves and their quality of life. In some cases there is a trade-off between major surgery and a smaller operation or procedure with a lower chance of cure, but a faster rate of recovery and fewer problems immediately after the procedure. (Examples of smaller operations include bringing the bowel out onto the abdominal wall; creating a 'stoma'. Examples of procedures include inserting a tube inside the bowel or oesophagus to open up a blockage; insertion of a 'stent'). Some patients may be advised or may choose not to undergo any form of treatment.

Deciding whether a person is fit enough to undergo a major operation is difficult and depends on patient factors (e.g. heart and lung fitness, other medical conditions, patient choice) and technical factors (location and spread of disease, availability of other options for treatment).

In the outpatient setting there are a number of tests that can be used to try to work out what the risks of a major operation will be for a particular person. These can then guide different approaches to try to lessen these risks. Examples include exercise programmes, dietary supplements and anxiety management programmes in the period before the operation. In the emergency setting there is often not sufficient time before their operation but there are still a number of ways of improving the chances of a good recovery, such as meeting with a physiotherapist and early planning for discharge needs.

This study aims to explore:

  1. Whether patients who have poor outcomes after surgery can be identified at the start of their surgical journey
  2. Whether there are specific patient characteristics that are associated with whether individual patients undergo major surgery or not.
  3. What patients feel about different support measures that may be put in place to try to improve outcomes

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

The UK population is aging. Under-investigation and under-treatment of older people is common, with rates of surgery declining with age, despite the incidence of surgically treated gastrointestinal pathology increasing with age. There are large variations in outcomes in older people, between different surgical units in the UK, which suggests that not all patients are receiving the same level of care or access to resources. In GI surgery, the concern is that patients in centres with low elective surgery rates will be inappropriately denied the benefits of operative intervention (disease control, symptom improvement), with consequently higher rates of emergency admission and intervention. Conversely, in centres with high rates of elective surgery, patients may be inappropriately subjected to the morbidity or even mortality of surgery with limited or no benefit.

Major surgery remains one of the most debilitating events that an older person may experience and may profoundly influence functional decline and disability. Optimisation of outcomes in older patients with comorbidities and frailty requires multi-professional input which is often lacking. Adverse factors associated with ageing include co-morbidity, polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, dependency and frailty, all of which are associated with increased all cause mortality in the general population. There is also a natural decline in cardiorespiratory fitness with age, however this may be modifiable with physical activity or exercise. Malnutrition and psychological problems are also very common in patients requiring gastrointestinal surgery. When these at-risk individuals are exposed to the stress of major abdominal surgery, post-operative mortality and morbidity also increase. Common lifestyle choices, including smoking, excess alcohol consumption and sedentary behaviours, add to this risk.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barnsley, United Kingdom, S75 2EP
        • Recruiting
        • Barnsley Hospital NHS FT
        • Contact:
          • Michael Shanaghey
    • Yorkshire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Older patients with GI pathology amenable to surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • Aged 65+ years old inclusive
  • Patients with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal pathology amenable to elective, urgent (unscheduled) or emergency major gastrointestinal surgery who either undergo surgery, a risk-adapted procedure or are managed conservatively (due to patient wishes, co-morbidities or frailty).
  • Mental capacity to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged less than 65 years old
  • Patients with unresectable disease (location, invasion, dissemination)
  • Lack mental capacity to consent
  • Unable to understand the information provided (translational issues)
  • Prisoners
  • Patients undergoing surgery for major trauma
  • Patients undergoing surgery for primary gynaecological, vascular or urological disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional recovery at 6 weeks post-operation/ definitive procedure or from decision not to operate
Time Frame: 6 weeks
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS). This is scored from 0 to 48 and then converted into a percentage. Minimum score 0%, maximum score 100%. Higher scores denote more disabled. "Disabled" classified as a score of 25% or higher. A change of 8% or more from baseline is defined as a new disability.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 weeks
EQ-5D-5L Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used for statistical analysis which is a scale from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst health you can imagine and 100 being the best health you can imagine. Baseline score will be compared to post-operative score.
6 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: From day 0 (hospital admission) to discharge from hospital (on average 6 days)
The number of days from hospital admission (day 0) to discharge from hospital (on average 6 days)
From day 0 (hospital admission) to discharge from hospital (on average 6 days)
Treatment related adverse events
Time Frame: From day 0 (treatment) to discharge from hospital (on average 6 days)
Reporting the type and grade of adverse event relating to the treatment. The AE will be graded using the Clavien-Dindo Classification system (grades I-IV), grade IV being the most severe.
From day 0 (treatment) to discharge from hospital (on average 6 days)
Survival
Time Frame: 6 months
Any death 6 months from index procedure or decision
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Daniels, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STH20694

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Old Age; Debility

Subscribe