Laser Treatment for the Improvement of Scars and Scleroderma

January 11, 2024 updated by: Dieter Manstein, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment for the Improvement of Hypertrophic Scars and Scleroderma: a Prospective Cohort Study

In this study, the investigators seek to evaluate the effects of a laser treatment on the redistribution/regeneration of collagen on the clinical, microscopic, and molecular profiles of hypertrophic scars and scleroderma.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of laser treatment for the improvement of the clinical appearance of disorders of collagen metabolism, including hypertrophic scars and scleroderma. The investigators will be performing a prospective cohort study. The entire lesion will receive laser treatment only.

The investigators plan to have 20 patients (10 patients with hypertrophic scars and 10 patients with scleroderma) complete the study.

Subjects must be equal to greater than 18 years old, but may be any gender or Fitzpatrick skin type. They must have one of the following: at least one extragenital hypertrophic scar, or at least one extragenital area of scleroderma . Subjects must not have received any prescription or in-clinic medications or treatments, such as intralesional corticosteroids or excision, on the eligible scars/scleroderma in the previous 3 months. Those on anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive medications will also be excluded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • MGH Clinical Unit for Research Trials & Outcomes in Skin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject must be able and willing to provide written informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol;
  2. In good general health, based on answers provided during the screening visit;
  3. Subject must be able to read and understand English;
  4. Any gender and any Fitzpatrick skin type;
  5. Age equal to or greater than 18 years old;
  6. Subjects in the hypertrophic scar branch must have at least one extragenital hypertrophic scar (defined as abnormal proliferation of scar tissue that forms at the site of cutaneous injury and does not regress and grows beyond the original margins of the scar) large enough to treat for both the control and experimental arm (at least 4cm in length for spit scar treatment) or two similar hypertrophic scars (at least 4cm2 for each);
  7. Subjects in the scleroderma branch must have eligible extragenital lesions; large enough to treat for both the control and experimental arm or two similar scleroderma areas (at least 4cm2 area for each);

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in another investigational drug or device clinical trial in the past 30 days;
  2. Are pregnant or lactating;
  3. Use of any prescription or in-clinic medications or treatments, such as intralesional corticosteroids or excision, on the eligible scars/scleroderma in the previous 3 months;
  4. History of allergic reaction to topical or local anesthesia;
  5. Regular intake of high doses of anti-inflammatory drugs (aspirin >81 mg/day, ibuprofen, corticosteroids, etc.) or immunosuppressive drugs;
  6. Clinically significant abnormal findings or conditions which might, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with study evaluations or pose a risk to subject safety during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Scars
The entire hypertrophic scar will receive laser treatment only.
Patients will receive three laser treatments at one-month intervals.
Active Comparator: Scleroderma
The entire lesion will receive laser treatment.
Patients will receive three laser treatments at one-month intervals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention
A score of 0 denotes "No evidence of disease, 100% improvement" and "Completely clear." A score of 1 denotes "Very significant clearance (≥90% to 100%); only traces of disease remain" and "Almost Clear." A score of 2 denotes "Significant improvement(≥75% to < 90%); some evidence of disease remains" and "Marked Improvement." A score of 3 denotes "Intermediate between slight and marked improvement (≥50% to <75%)" and "Moderate Improvement." A score of 4 denotes "Some improvement (≥25% to <50%); significant evidence of disease remains" and "Slight Improvement ." A score of 5 denotes "Disease has not changed from baseline (+ or - <25%)" and "No Change." A score of 6 denotes "Disease is worse than at baseline by ≥25% or more" and "Worse."
baseline, pre-intervention
Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 1 month after baseline
A score of 0 denotes "No evidence of disease, 100% improvement" and "Completely clear." A score of 1 denotes "Very significant clearance (≥90% to 100%); only traces of disease remain" and "Almost Clear." A score of 2 denotes "Significant improvement(≥75% to < 90%); some evidence of disease remains" and "Marked Improvement." A score of 3 denotes "Intermediate between slight and marked improvement (≥50% to <75%)" and "Moderate Improvement." A score of 4 denotes "Some improvement (≥25% to <50%); significant evidence of disease remains" and "Slight Improvement ." A score of 5 denotes "Disease has not changed from baseline (+ or - <25%)" and "No Change." A score of 6 denotes "Disease is worse than at baseline by ≥25% or more" and "Worse."
1 month after baseline
Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 2 months after baseline
A score of 0 denotes "No evidence of disease, 100% improvement" and "Completely clear." A score of 1 denotes "Very significant clearance (≥90% to 100%); only traces of disease remain" and "Almost Clear." A score of 2 denotes "Significant improvement(≥75% to < 90%); some evidence of disease remains" and "Marked Improvement." A score of 3 denotes "Intermediate between slight and marked improvement (≥50% to <75%)" and "Moderate Improvement." A score of 4 denotes "Some improvement (≥25% to <50%); significant evidence of disease remains" and "Slight Improvement ." A score of 5 denotes "Disease has not changed from baseline (+ or - <25%)" and "No Change." A score of 6 denotes "Disease is worse than at baseline by ≥25% or more" and "Worse."
2 months after baseline
Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 3 months after baseline
A score of 0 denotes "No evidence of disease, 100% improvement" and "Completely clear." A score of 1 denotes "Very significant clearance (≥90% to 100%); only traces of disease remain" and "Almost Clear." A score of 2 denotes "Significant improvement(≥75% to < 90%); some evidence of disease remains" and "Marked Improvement." A score of 3 denotes "Intermediate between slight and marked improvement (≥50% to <75%)" and "Moderate Improvement." A score of 4 denotes "Some improvement (≥25% to <50%); significant evidence of disease remains" and "Slight Improvement ." A score of 5 denotes "Disease has not changed from baseline (+ or - <25%)" and "No Change." A score of 6 denotes "Disease is worse than at baseline by ≥25% or more" and "Worse."
3 months after baseline
Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 4 months after baseline
A score of 0 denotes "No evidence of disease, 100% improvement" and "Completely clear." A score of 1 denotes "Very significant clearance (≥90% to 100%); only traces of disease remain" and "Almost Clear." A score of 2 denotes "Significant improvement(≥75% to < 90%); some evidence of disease remains" and "Marked Improvement." A score of 3 denotes "Intermediate between slight and marked improvement (≥50% to <75%)" and "Moderate Improvement." A score of 4 denotes "Some improvement (≥25% to <50%); significant evidence of disease remains" and "Slight Improvement ." A score of 5 denotes "Disease has not changed from baseline (+ or - <25%)" and "No Change." A score of 6 denotes "Disease is worse than at baseline by ≥25% or more" and "Worse."
4 months after baseline
Physician's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Up to 1 year after baseline
A score of 0 denotes "No evidence of disease, 100% improvement" and "Completely clear." A score of 1 denotes "Very significant clearance (≥90% to 100%); only traces of disease remain" and "Almost Clear." A score of 2 denotes "Significant improvement(≥75% to < 90%); some evidence of disease remains" and "Marked Improvement." A score of 3 denotes "Intermediate between slight and marked improvement (≥50% to <75%)" and "Moderate Improvement." A score of 4 denotes "Some improvement (≥25% to <50%); significant evidence of disease remains" and "Slight Improvement ." A score of 5 denotes "Disease has not changed from baseline (+ or - <25%)" and "No Change." A score of 6 denotes "Disease is worse than at baseline by ≥25% or more" and "Worse."
Up to 1 year after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis scale
Time Frame: Compare baseline to post-procedural
To assess facial scleroderma
Compare baseline to post-procedural
Vancouver Scar Scale
Time Frame: Compare baseline to post-procedural
To assess all scars, facial and non-facial
Compare baseline to post-procedural
Range of Motion Evaluation
Time Frame: Compare baseline to post-procedural
For non-facial scleroderma to evaluate range of motion of the joint by assessing flexion, extension, supination, and pronation using a goniometer
Compare baseline to post-procedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dieter Manstein, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019P002156

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scars

Clinical Trials on Laser Treatment

3
Subscribe