Feasibility of the Mi2000 Totally Implantable Cochlear Implant in Severely to Profoundly Deaf Adults. (TICI)

Feasibility Study: A Totally Implantable Cochlear Implant (Mi2000) for Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Pathway of Adults With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss

This clinical investigation aims to collect data on the use of the Mi2000 system, a totally implantable cochlear implant system, for the first time in human subjects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cochlear implants (CI) provide a large majority of recipients with a significant degree of speech understanding. However, CI systems rely on external parts, namely Behind-the-Ear (BTE) audio processors with coils or single-unit processors to function. This can have several disadvantages: for instance, the hardware is exposed to external trauma and to the effects of head movement and gravity. The device is also put at risk by humid, dusty, or dirty conditions as well as by physical activities that lead to water exposure such as swimming or sports in general (e.g. perspiration).

In addition, some patients are concerned with the cosmetic appearance of the external parts which are visible (more so than modern behind-the-ear hearing aids), something that may not be desirable to many potential candidates.

This clinical investigation aims to collect data on the use of the Mi2000 system, a totally implantable cochlear implant system, for the first time in human subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Department ORL
    • Bayern
      • München, Bayern, Germany, 81377
        • Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minimum age of eighteen (18) years at time of enrolment
  • Bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with no or limited benefit from a hearing aid (>70 dB HL PTA4)
  • Post-lingual onset of deafness
  • No or limited benefit from hearing aids for less than 10 years.
  • A maximum score of 50% on a monosyllables test in the language of the test centre in the ear to be implanted
  • General health condition, psychological and emotional condition deemed compatible with the treatment and tests performed in this study and realistic expectations, as deemed appropriate by the implanting surgeon/implant board
  • Fluency in the test language with excellent proficiency, as appropriate to perform speech testing
  • Evidence of up-to-date vaccinations against meningitis, as per recommendations by the applicable national body
  • Signed and dated informed consent before the start of any study-specific procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of compliance with any inclusion criterion
  • Previously having received an implant on the location chosen for placing the cochlear implant
  • Having received a hearing implant from another manufacturer than MED-EL on the contralateral ear
  • Pre-existing condition known to necessitate MRI scans after implantation of the Mi2000
  • Women being pregnant or nursing
  • Women of child-bearing age not reporting to use effective contraception
  • Contraindication to surgery in the middle and inner ear
  • Contraindication to general anaesthesia
  • Cochlear malformations, ossification or other obliteration of the cochlea, history of meningitis preventing placement of the electrode array, as confirmed by medical examination
  • Acute cholesteatoma
  • Acute external or middle ear infections
  • Perforated tympanic membrane
  • Known intolerance to any of the materials used for the implant or accessories
  • Non-functional auditory nerve and/or upper auditory pathway including a history of vestibular schwannoma
  • Factors preventing appropriate placement of the stimulator housing and the microphone, including fixation with screws, in the bone of the skull
  • Unstable Meniere's disease, Auditory Neuropathy, Epilepsy not responding to treatment
  • Unrealistic expectations of the subject
  • Permanent inability and/or unwillingness to participation in post-operative care and rehabilitation
  • Known intellectual disability and/or psychological diseases
  • Participation in other pharmacological clinical trials within four weeks prior to enrolment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mi2000 Cochlear Implant surgery
During the surgery visit, the Mi2000 Cochlear Implant will be implanted according to the general surgical guidelines and the Mi2000 specific surgical guidelines under general anaesthesia.
During the surgery visit, the Mi2000 Cochlear Implant will be implanted according to the general surgical guidelines and the Mi2000 specific surgical guidelines under general anaesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of the study device
Time Frame: up to 16 weeks
Safety of the study device in the intended population will be assessed by an analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported
up to 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of the study device
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Safety of the study device in the intended population will be assessed by an analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported
up to 52 weeks
Speech perception in quiet
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Speech perception in quiet will be assessed with a monosyllables test
up to 52 weeks
Speech perception in noise
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Speech perception in noise will be assessed with a sentence test in noise
up to 52 weeks
Audiograms
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Audiograms will be recorded in unaided and in best aided condition
up to 52 weeks
Impedance Field Telemetry
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Impedance Field Telemetry (PIFT)
up to 52 weeks
Auditory Nerve Response Telemetry (ART)
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Auditory Nerve Response Telemetry (ART)
up to 52 weeks
Hardware and device parameters stored in the internal memory
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Readout of device parameters stored in the devices internal memory (e.g. log files, battery status, charging status, usage times)
up to 52 weeks
Questionnaire on usability of the device
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Device use will be assessed using a questionnaire, recording user feedback
up to 52 weeks
Health Utilities Index 2/3 (HUI2/3)
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed by the HUI2/3 questionnaire
up to 52 weeks
Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing (12 item version) (SSQ12)
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed by hte SSQ12 questionnaire
up to 52 weeks
Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ)
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Quality of life will be assessed by the NCIQ questionnaire
up to 52 weeks
Sound quality ratings
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Subjective rating of sound quality
up to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Phillippe Lefebvre, Prof. Dr. med., Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, ORL
  • Principal Investigator: Joachim Müller, Prof. Dr. med., Klinikum der Universität München, HNO

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cochlear Implants

Clinical Trials on Mi2000 Totally Implantable Cochlear Implant

3
Subscribe