Effect of Session Frequency of rESWT on Gastrocnemius Muscle Spasticity in Children With Spastic Type Cerebral Palsy

September 28, 2020 updated by: Rizky Kusuma Wardhani

Effect of Session Frequency of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (rESWT) on Gastrocnemius Muscle Spasticity in Children With Spastic Type Cerebral Palsy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

Spasticity, defined as a velocity dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes, is one of the most prominent motor problems that occur in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). This causes difficulty in achieving balance, mobility, and an upright stance. CP is a group of permanent disorders that affect the development of movement and posture caused by a non-progressive damage to the brain. Because CP occurs in 2-3 of 1000 individuals, it is one of the most common causes of severe physical disability in children.

Mismanagement of spasticity can lead to contracture which is extremely difficult to treat and may result in severe functional disabilities. The current management of spasticity in CP includes physical therapy (i.e. passive stretching), oral medication, botulinum toxin injection, and surgery. Botulinum toxin injection has been proven to effectively reduce spasticity yet many patients are unable to get access to this treatment due to its high cost. Moreover, Botulinum toxin injection is currently not covered by the public health insurance of Indonesia. Therefore, other modalities which are more affordable and are non-invasive therapies should be considered as a treatment option for spasticity.

Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (rESWT) has been utilized in the medical practice for the treatment of several musculoskeletal disorders such as chronic tendinopathies and spasticity. It is hypothesized that ESWT has two main effects which include a direct effect from mechanical forces at the treatment point and an indirect effect from cavitation. Even though rESWT has less penetration capacity over the focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (fESWT), rESWT is still believed to be more superior to fESWT because it requires less precise focusing, is less painful, and costs less. These also make rESWT the more appropriate choice for children with CP.

Many studies have proven the efficacy of ESWT in reducing spasticity in spastic CP patients with significantly long lasting effects. Despite promising results, there still has yet to be a recommended guideline for the treatment of spasticity in children using rESWT. One of the critical parameters needed to be determined is the frequency of treatment. Therefore, the objective of this study is to understand whether the reduction in gastrocnemius stiffness in children with spastic CP is influenced by the frequency of ESWT sessions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed as a double-blinded and randomized controlled trial.

Pediatric CP patients from the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (RSCM) are involved in this research. Participants were selected using the inclusion criteria as follow: 1) children with spastic CP who are 5 - 18 years old, 2) one or two gastrocnemius muscle with an Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS) of two or more, 3) at least 6 months since the last botulinum injection on gastrocnemius, 4) no surgical operation on lower limb within the last 12 months, 5) absence of severe contracture on gastrocnemius, and 6) ability of legal caregiver to provide written informed consent.

The spasticity of gastrocnemius was evaluated using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity). Data were collected at nine time points: 1) pre-ESWT, 2-6) immediately after each ESWT session, 7) 4 weeks after the last (fifth) ESWT session, 8) 8 weeks after the last (fifth) ESWT session, and 9) 12 weeks after the last (fifth) ESWT session. All patients were examined by the same physiatrist who was blinded to the protocol (i.e. not informed about the study and the group allocation) throughout the whole study.

The investigators used a BTL-6000 SWT Topline (BTL, Czech Republic) to apply rESWT on gastrocnemius muscles. For the procedures, a 1.2 cm probe was used. A total of 1,500 pulses were delivered to each gastrocnemius muscle. The energy flux density was constant at 0.1 mJ/mm2 and the repetition frequency was at 4 Hz, with a pressure of 1.5 bars.

For double-blinded treatment, 28 different spastic gastrocnemius muscles from 14 CP patients were allocated into two groups. Both groups had a true or sham ESWT for five consecutive weekly treatments. Group I received five true ESWT sessions. Group II received three true ESWT in session 1, 3 and 5 and two sham ESWTs in session 2 and 4. No anesthesia was given. Adverse events were closely monitored during and after therapy.

Intra-group changes in ASAS were evaluated with Friedman analysis of variance from baseline, immediately after each ESWT, 4 weeks after last (fifth) ESWT, 8 weeks after last (fifth) ESWT and 12 weeks after last (fifth) ESWT; followed by post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-ranked test. Inter-group differences in ASAS reduction were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U- test. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS ver. 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The level of significance was set at <0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DKI Jakarta
      • Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Universitas Indonesia Fakultas Kedokteran

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with spastic CP aged 5 to 18 years old
  • at least one gastrocnemius with an Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS) of 2 or more
  • ability of legal respondent to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 6 months or less since the last botulinum injection on hamstring
  • surgical operation on lower limb within the last 12 months
  • severe contracture on gastrocnemius

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Five true ESWT sessions

A total of five sessions (1x/week) were conducted.

A total of 1,500 pulses were delivered to each gastrocnemius muscle. The energy flux density was constant at 0.1 mJ/mm2 and the repetition frequency was at 4 Hz, with a pressure of 1.5 bars.

rESWT was given on gastrocnemius muscles with the subject lying on prone position. No anesthesia was required.
Experimental: Three true ESWT sessions and two sham ESWT sessions

A total of three true ESWT (week 1, 3 and 5) and two sham ESWTs in (week 2 and 4) were conducted.

For true ESWT sessions, a total of 1,500 pulses were delivered to each gastrocnemius muscle. The energy flux density was constant at 0.1 mJ/mm2 and the repetition frequency was at 4 Hz, with a pressure of 1.5 bars.

For sham ESWT sessions, a total of 1,500 pulses were delivered to each gastrocnemius muscle with a 1 cm gap between between the probe and subject's skin. The energy flux density was constant at 0.1 mJ/mm2 and the repetition frequency was at 4 Hz, with a pressure of 1.5 bars.

rESWT was given on gastrocnemius muscles with the subject lying on prone position. No anesthesia was required.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Spasticity of Gastrocnemius
Time Frame: pre-ESWT
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
pre-ESWT
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after first ESWT session
Time Frame: After first ESWT session (Week 1)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
After first ESWT session (Week 1)
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after second ESWT session
Time Frame: After second ESWT session (Week 2)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
After second ESWT session (Week 2)
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after third ESWT session
Time Frame: After third ESWT session (Week 3)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
After third ESWT session (Week 3)
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after fourth ESWT session
Time Frame: After fourth ESWT session (Week 4)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
After fourth ESWT session (Week 4)
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after fifth ESWT session
Time Frame: After fifth ESWT session (Week 5)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
After fifth ESWT session (Week 5)
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius four weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session
Time Frame: Four weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 9)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
Four weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 9)
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius eight weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session
Time Frame: Eight weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 13)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
Eight weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 13)
Spasticity of Gastrocnemius twelve weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session
Time Frame: Twelve weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 17)
Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)
Twelve weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 17)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rizky K Wardhani, M.D., Physiatrist, Universitas Indonesia Fakultas Kedokteran

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Subscribe