Nociception-Level (NOL) for the Assessment of Pain in Patient Unable to Self-Report (MoNOLog)

December 12, 2021 updated by: Medasense Biometrics Ltd

Nociception-Level (NOL) for the Assessment of Pain in Patient Unable to Self-Report: An Exploratory, Prospective, Unblinded, Single-center Study- The MoNOLog Study

In this study we aimed to investigate the performance and effectiveness of NOL and/or NOLedge as a tool for pain assessment in geriatric and critical ill non communicating patients.

Our hypothesis was that NOL and the NOLedge may have good correlation with the health-care professional assessment PAINAD, BPS values, even with the use of the drugs affecting autonomic nervous system.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Netanya, Israel, 42420
        • Dorot Netanya Gariatric Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a clinical syndrome due to disease of a progressive nature, which leads to disturbances in multiple higher cortical functions, including memory, thinking, orientation, comprehension, calculation, learning capacity, language and judgment;

  1. Older adults with advanced dementia;
  2. Critically ill/unconscious patients;
  3. Patients at the end of life stage.
  4. Ventilated patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female, Age > 18 years old.
  • Spontaneously breathing or mechanically ventilated
  • Any patient who is unable to express his/her own level of personal pain by using visual scales according to the hospital standard
  • Written informed consent provided by the participant (if they have capacity) or guardian (if they do not have capacity) or a written proxy informed consent from a legally authorized representative empowered to make health-related decisions for the potential study participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A patient whose staff or research team believes that his or her participation in the research will cause suffering to the patient.
  • Unstable condition preventing planned routine procedures of care, and conditions precluding the use of PMD-200: absence of sinus cardiac rhythm.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy outcome
Time Frame: 5 months
To identify what information is currently elicited and used by clinicians when detecting and managing pain.
5 months
Efficacy outcome
Time Frame: 5 months
To assess the feasibility of the current NOL algorithm (PMD200 vs. NOLedge) for pain management in the study population.
5 months
Efficacy outcome
Time Frame: 5 months
To collect data to improve the performance of the NOL algorithm in the study population
5 months
Efficacy outcome
Time Frame: 10 months
The ability of the NOL index to discriminate between periods of painful and non-painful periods
10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy outcome
Time Frame: 10 months
NOL-index performance to detect pain in comparison to PAINAD, BPS pain scores
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adi Sasson, Dr., DOROT, Netanya Geriatric Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on PMD200

Subscribe