- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04593472
SHARE: Sharing Healthcare Wishes in Primary Care
Sharing Healthcare Wishes in Primary Care
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
SHARE is guided by the patient-provider communication, family caregiving, health services, and health informatics literatures in acknowledging the multiple pathways by which interpersonal relationships influence treatment decisions and end-of-life care. Each component of SHARE has been found to improve a range of communication outcomes in other care contexts, but have not previously been applied in this combination or examined with regard to advance care planning in persons with cognitive impairment. SHARE is designed to be broadly scalable and widely relevant to diverse primary care patients and stakeholders. The study goal is to engage family members or friends ("family" and/or "caregiver") in longitudinal interactions with primary care clinicians and stimulate and support advance care planning discussions in primary care. SHARE seeks to improve communication for persons with cognitive impairment by establishing a structured protocol to proactively engage family caregivers in ongoing interactions with primary care clinicians and stimulate and support advance care planning in primary care throughout the disease trajectory.
SHARE evaluates a multicomponent communication intervention to proactively engage family members or friends and support advance care planning in primary care. SHARE encompasses the following four therapeutic elements: 1) a letter from the practice introducing the initiative, 2) access to a designated person (medical assistant, social worker, nurse, or lay person) trained to lead advance care planning discussions, 3) person-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of the caregiver and stimulate discussion about goals of care, and 4) education about communication and available resources, including a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor", a blank easy to complete advance directive, and facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and caregiver) to extend electronic interactions and information access to family. The control group receives minimally enhanced usual care with print educational materials that include the 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive. Participants in both groups are followed over a 24-month period. Outcomes are assessed from patient and caregiver enrollment surveys conducted in-person or by telephone or video conference at enrollment and follow-up telephone or web surveys at 6, 12, and 24 months; Electronic health record portal activity; information about advance directive completion from the electronic medical record; burdensome care at the end of life from family survey and Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients (CRISP).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
- MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21225
- MedStar Harbor Hospital
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21211
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Remington
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
- Beacham Center
-
Dundalk, Maryland, United States, 21222
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Greater Dundalk
-
Mitchellville, Maryland, United States, 20721
- Medstar CSA Collington and House call Program
-
Nottingham, Maryland, United States, 21236
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - White Marsh
-
Olney, Maryland, United States, 20832
- Medstar CSA Montgomery County
-
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States, 20906
- MedStar Health at Leisure World Boulevard
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient: 80 years or older, English speaking, able to provide informed consent themselves or through their legally authorized representative, identify a family member or friend who plays an active role in care coordination or accompanies them to primary care visits, not planning to move out of state within the next year, and cognitive impairment (mild-severe) on the basis of one or more incorrect answers or not being able to respond to a validated 6-item telephone screening instrument.
- Family/Friend: 18 years and older, English speaking, hear well enough to communicate by telephone, not planning to move out of the state within the next year, do not report having a life-threatening illness and are a family member or unpaid friend who attends at least some medical visits of an eligible person with cognitive impairment, do not screen positive as having cognitive impairment on the basis of fewer than two incorrect answers on the 6-item telephone screening instrument.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient: less than 80 years old, non-English speaking, do not help with care coordination or attend primary care visits with a family member/friend, no willing/able legal guardian or representative to provide written informed consent for those who do not have capacity, plan to move out of state within the next year, or do not have cognitive impairment on the basis of all correct answers on the 6-item telephone screening instrument.
- Family/Friend: less than 18 years old, non-English speaking, do not help with care coordination or attend at least some medical visits of an eligible patient, do not hear well enough to communicate by telephone, report having a life-threatening illness, plan to move out of state within the next year, are a non-family member who is paid for their services, or has cognitive impairment on the basis of two or more incorrect answers on the 6-item telephone screening instrument.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SHARE
SHARE components include: 1) a letter from the practice introducing the initiative, 2) access to a designated person (medical assistant, social worker, nurse, or lay person) trained to lead advance care planning discussions, 3) person-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of the caregiver and stimulate discussion about goals of care, and 4) education about communication and available resources, including a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor", a blank easy to complete advance directive, and facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and caregiver participants) to extend electronic interactions and information access to family.
|
SHARE is a multicomponent communication intervention to proactively engage family members or friends to support advance care planning in primary care.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Minimally Enhanced Usual Care
Minimally enhanced usual care participants are provided with print educational materials that include a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive.
|
Minimally enhanced usual care participants are provided with print educational materials that include a 44-page brochure developed by the National Institute on Aging entitled "A Guide for Older People: Talking with your Doctor" and a blank easy-to-complete advance directive.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average Scores for Patient and Caregiver-Reported Quality of Communication at 6-Months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The primary outcome assesses family-reported quality of communication with the primary care team using the 7-item end-of-life subscale of the validated Quality of Communication Scale.
The scale for each item is from 0 ('Worst you can imagine') to 10 ('Best you can imagine'), with a range of 0-70 with higher scores indicating higher perceived quality of communication.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average Scores for Patient and Caregiver-Reported Readiness to Engage in Advance Care Planning at 6-months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that assesses advance care planning process measures on a 5-point Likert scale.
The outcome assesses a 6-item subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey that includes parallel items for patient and family participants.
The scale for each item is from 1 ("I have never thought about it") to 5 ("I have already done it"), with a range of 6-30 with higher scores indicating higher perceived readiness to engage in advance care planning.
|
6 months
|
|
Proportion of Patients With Documentation of Advance Directive Completion in the Electronic Health Record at 6-months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Documentation of advance directive completion in the electronic health record is defined as having a durable power of attorney or a living will documented in the primary care electronic health record.
The Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) will not be included for this outcome as the completion of a Maryland MOLST is mandatory in certain situations, such as on transfer between settings of care, and is not indicative of having had an advance care planning discussion or naming a durable power of attorney.
|
6 months
|
|
Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Decisional Conflict
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Decisional Conflict 2-3 months after patient's death.
The Decisional Conflict Scale is a 16-item instrument scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("strongly agree") to 4 ("strongly disagree").The 16 items are summed, divided by 16, then multiplied by 25 to yield scores that range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
Higher scores indicate higher decisional conflict.
|
24 months
|
|
Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Decisional Regret
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Decisional Regret 2-3 months after patient's death.
This outcome assesses bereaved family-reported decisional regret using a 5-item instrument that assesses the extent to which decision-makers experience regret about care.
Response options are assessed using a 5-item Likert scale in which scores of 1 indicate the least regret and 5 the most regret.
Scores are then reduced by 1 point and multiplied by 25 for a scale that ranges in value from 0 to 100.
Prior studies have categorized scores of 0 as no regret, 1 to 25 as mild regret, and more than 25 as heightened regret.
Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of regret.
|
24 months
|
|
Average Scores for Bereaved Family Symptoms of Anxiety
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Caregivers of patients who die are asked to respond to questions about Symptoms of Anxiety 2-3 months after patient's death.
This outcome assesses bereaved family symptoms of anxiety using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire (GAD-7).
The GAD-7 is a validated instrument that asks about symptoms of anxiety using a two-week recall period with response categories that vary from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day").
Item responses are summed to construct composite scores.
Higher scores indicate more symptoms of anxiety.
|
24 months
|
|
Average Scores for Bereaved Family-Reported Satisfaction With Care at the End-of-Life in Dementia
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Caregivers of patients who die are asked to assess their Satisfaction with Care at the End-of-life in Dementia 2-3 months after patient's death using the Satisfaction with Care at the End-of-Life in Dementia (SWC-EOLD).
This is a 10-item instrument measured on a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree") with a summary score ranging from 10-40 in which higher values indicate higher satisfaction.
Higher scores indicate better satisfaction with care at the end-of-life in dementia.
|
24 months
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Received Burdensome Care
Time Frame: 24 months
|
For patients who die while enrolled in the study by 24 months, this outcome assesses the proportion of patients who received burdensome care near the end of life.
Burdensome care is defined as any intensive care unit use or life prolonging care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, dialysis, artificial nutrition, chemotherapy) within 30 days of death using dates and services abstracted from medical records and the Chesapeake Regional Information System (CRISP), Maryland's Health Information Exchange, which includes all hospital encounters.
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer Wolff, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wolff JL, Roter DL, Boyd CM, Roth DL, Echavarria DM, Aufill J, Vick JB, Gitlin LN. Patient-Family Agenda Setting for Primary Care Patients with Cognitive Impairment: the SAME Page Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1478-1486. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4563-y. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
- Wolff JL, Berger A, Clarke D, Green JA, Stametz R, Yule C, Darer JD. Patients, care partners, and shared access to the patient portal: online practices at an integrated health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1150-1158. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw025. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
- Wolff JL, Aufill J, Echavarria D, Heughan JA, Lee KT, Connolly RM, Fetting JH, Jelovac D, Papathakis K, Riley C, Stearns V, Thorner E, Zafman N, Levy HP, Dy SM, Wolff AC. Sharing in care: engaging care partners in the care and communication of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Aug;177(1):127-136. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05306-9. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
- Reiff JS, Cagle J, Zhang T, Roth DL, Wolff JL. Fielding the quality of communication questionnaire to persons with cognitive impairment and their family in primary care: A pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):221-226. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18034. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
- Wolff JL, Cagle J, Echavarria D, Dy SM, Giovannetti ER, Boyd CM, Hanna V, Hussain N, Reiff JS, Scerpella D, Zhang T, Roth DL. Sharing Health Care Wishes in Primary Care (SHARE) among older adults with possible cognitive impairment in primary care: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jun;129:107208. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107208. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
- Cagle JG, Reiff JS, Smith A, Echavarria D, Scerpella D, Zhang T, Roth DL, Hanna V, Boyd CM, Hussain NA, Wolff JL. Assessing Advance Care Planning Fidelity within the Context of Cognitive Impairment: The SHARE Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Aug;68(2):180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 15.
- Wolff JL, Cagle JG, Hanna V, Dy SM, Echavarria D, Giovannetti ER, Boyd CM, Saylor MA, Hussain N, Reiff JS, Scerpella D, Zhang T, Sekhon VK, Roth DL. Sharing health care wishes among older adults with cognitive impairment in primary care: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Oct;20(10):7263-7273. doi: 10.1002/alz.14210. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00242431
- R01AG058671 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Subjective Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianNot yet recruitingCognitive Impairment | Anesthesia | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Anesthesia Brain Monitoring | Cognitive Impairment, Progressive | Anesthesia Depth MonitoringUnited Kingdom
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusUniversity of Florence; Consorzio di Bioingeneria e Informatica Medica; Gutenberg...CompletedCognitive Dysfunction | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Vascular Cognitive ImpairmentItaly
-
University of California, Los AngelesCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | Age-associated Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
Universidad de ZaragozaRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Randomized Controlled Trial | Subjective Cognitive ImpairmentSpain
-
BaycrestCentre for Aging and Brain Health InnovationUnknownNeurocognitive Disorders | Cognitive Dysfunction | Mental Disorder | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Cognitive Disorder | Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
Region SkaneLund University; Berry LabCompletedMemory Impairment | Cognitive Impairment, MildSweden
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Vascular Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
University of HawaiiRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Subjective Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
University of GeorgiaApplied Universal Dynamics, Corp.; Van Robotics, Inc.Active, not recruitingRobot-assisted Cognitive Training for Lonely Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) (MCI)Cognitive Change | Aging | Cognitive Impairment, MildUnited States
Clinical Trials on Sharing Healthcare Wishes in Primary Care (SHARE)
-
Carlos III Health InstituteHealth Department of the Basque GovernmentCompleted
-
St. Olavs HospitalCommunity Health NetworkCompleted
-
University Hospital, AntwerpHasselt University; Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg; Universiteit AntwerpenCompletedCOVID-19 | Long COVID | Post COVID-19 ConditionBelgium
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheim KommuneCompleted
-
University of ChicagoTerminated
-
St. Lawrence Health SystemRecruiting
-
Kaiser PermanenteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingBreast Cancer | Colorectal CancerUnited States
-
Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere VirgiliInstitut Català de la Salut; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; University Rovira... and other collaboratorsCompletedMetabolic Syndrome | Childhood Obesity | Body CompositionSpain
-
Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS TrustApplied Research Collaboration for Yorkshire and HumberUnknownSafe Paramedic Non-conveyanceUnited Kingdom
-
Children's National Research InstitutePatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Louisiana Public Health InstituteNot yet recruitingCongenital Heart Disease | Comorbidities and Coexisting ConditionsUnited States