Rotational Thromboelastometry Versus DIC Score in Sepsis (RODSS)

December 18, 2024 updated by: Sirak Petros, MD, University of Leipzig

Rotational Thromboelastometry Versus The Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Score in Sepsis (RODSS)

Sepsis results in activation of the coagulation system, which is commonly described as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The DIC score, which is commonly used to define this syndrome, does not allow to delineate between hypercoagulation and hypocoagulation. The aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate data from automated rotational thromboelastometry and compare These with the DIC score regarding intensive care unit outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Sepsis results in an intensive interaction between Inflammation and the coagulation system. The activation of the coagulation system leads to consumption of procoagulatory as well as anticoagulatory proteins and platelets. This process may induce microcirculatory thrombosis as well as hemorrhagic diathesis, which is commonly described as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) recommends the use of the DIC score to describe this syndrome. A score of at least 5 points is defined as an overt DIC. However, the DIC score does not allow to differentiate between a hypercoagulation and hypocoagulation states and whether there could be a difference regarding outcome between the two states.

In this prospective observational study, patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit will be included. The DIC score as well as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) will be evaluated within the first 24 hours after the diagnosis of sepsis as well as on day 3 and 5.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Saxony
      • Leipzig, Saxony, Germany, D-04103
        • University Hospital of Leipzig

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with sepsis admitted to a medical intensive care unit

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sepsis, defined according to the Sepsis-3 Definition
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 years
  • pregnancy and lactation
  • known coagulation disorder prior to Admission for sepsis
  • known cirrhosis of the liver
  • known active malignancy
  • surgical procedure during the last 4 weeks
  • refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between the clotting time, clot formation time, maximum clot firmness and lysis index at 30 minutes from FIBTEM, INTEM, EXTEM and APTEM measurements of the ROTEM assay with an overt DIC on the day of sepsis diagnosis regarding ICU survival
Time Frame: through study completion, up to an average of 7 days
The ICU survival of patients with abnormal clotting time, clot formation time, maximum clot firmness or lysis index at 30 minutes from FIBTEM, INTEM, EXTEM and APTEM of the ROTEM assay will be compared to that of patients with an overt DIC according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)
through study completion, up to an average of 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
correlation between ROTEM variables and the Sequential Organ Function Assessment Score
Time Frame: through study completion, up to an average of 7 days
The Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score of patients with any abnormal ROTEM variable will be compared to the score of patients without any abnormal ROTEM variable
through study completion, up to an average of 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sirak Petros, MD, University of Leipzig

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on rotational thromboelastometry

Subscribe