Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Shear Wave Elastography

April 17, 2023 updated by: Edward Grant, University of Southern California

Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Shear Wave Elastography in Conjunction With ACR TI-RADS for the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules

Our overall hypothesis is that Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) will allow for high diagnostic accuracy of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, which will correlate with and complement the ACR TI-RADS classification system, allowing for more accurate diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thyroid nodules are an exceedingly common clinical entity, however, only a small percentage of nodules are malignant. Conventional ultrasound is the current standard for the initial evaluation of thyroid nodules, yet due to several overlapping characteristics between benign and malignant nodules its utility in diagnosis has been limited, leading to a high rate of negative biopsies. To overcome these challenges the American College of Radiology has proposed a Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in an effort to decrease unnecessary biopsies [5]. While these efforts have shown encouraging results, further work is still needed. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) are two emerging non-invasive imaging techniques which have shown promising results in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, data is limited and how these imaging modalities could potentially compliment ACR TI-RADS is unknown.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC Department of Radiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients over the age of 18 with one or more thyroid nodules diagnosed on conventional ultrasound within the last 6 months.
  • Patients referred for standard of care thyroid nodule biopsy, ordered at the discretion of the treating physician and/or radiologists.
  • Patients must demonstrate ability to understand and express willingness to sign a written informed consent to undergo SWE and CEUS imaging prior to their thyroid nodule biopsy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are pregnant, nursing, or less than 18 years of age
  • Thyroid nodules ≤1 cm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: CEUS and SWE
CEUS & SWE
Non Invasive Imaging Technique. CEUS involves the use of microbubble contrast agents and specialized imaging techniques to enhance the signal from blood, thus showing flow in macroscopic vessels as well as tissue perfusion informatio
Non Ivasive Imaging Technique. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) is a recently developed technique that uses ultrasound to noninvasively assess the mechanical stiffness of tissue by measuring tissue distortion in ponse to an acoustic radiation force impulse from a focused ultrasound beam.
UltraSound System Cleared by FDA 510 (k) K180067

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement: 1) between two radiologists for visually assessed CEUS result and 2) between the radiologists reconciled visual assessment result and the gold standard result (biopsy).
Time Frame: 8 months
Kappa analysis will be used to assess the agreement between the two radiologists visual assessment result. The rating result of each radiologist will be compared to the pathological result using Kappa analysis as well.
8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement between the statistical model predicted result using quantitative metrics from CEUS and/or SWE and the gold standard result (biopsy).
Time Frame: 12 months
Kappa analysis will be used to re-assess the agreement between the two radiologists visual assessment result. Any disagreement between the radiologists will need to be reconciled and consensus reached. The final assessment result from the radiologists will be compared to the cytology and/or surgical gold standard using anther Kappa test.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edward Grant, MD, University of Southern California

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Nodule

Clinical Trials on Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

3
Subscribe