Transarticular Lateral Release Versus Percutaneous Lateral Release for Hallux Valgus

October 29, 2020 updated by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Transarticular Lateral Release Versus Percutaneous Lateral Release in Combination With Distal Metatarsal Chevron Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus -A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial-

background Hallux valgus (HV) is a common forefoot disorder in need of surgical intervention after failed conservative treatment. Surgical treatment of HV generally includes different kinds of osteotomy in combination with different distal soft tissue procedures (DSTP). Commonly used DSTP are open first-web lateral release, transarticular lateral release (TALR), and percutaneous lateral release (PCLR). In some studies, TALR showed similar surgical outcomes with open first-web space lateral release. Besides, PCLR has been described with satisfactory outcomes. TALR and PCLR are gaining popularity due to their less invasive approach and potential in combination with a distal metatarsal Chevron osteotomy (DMCO). Currently, there is no study comparing the surgical results between TALR and PCLR for surgical reconstruction of HV.

Aim The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to compare the surgical outcomes of TALR versus PCLR, both in combination of DMCO, for the treatment of HV. Our hypothesis is that TALR would achieve a better surgical outcomes than PCLR.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will be conducted from January, 2021 to December, 2024. A total of 140 participants are included with 70 participants in each group. Participants are allocated to TALR or PCLR group before index surgery according to a computer-generated randomization list.

For all patients, after regional nerve block and adequate sedation, intraoperative stress test is performed for flexibility of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ).6 The test is confirmed with dorsoplantar fluoroscopy. Only the cases with negative results (passive correction is not possible) are included. Then, a medial incision of 2.5-cm is made at distal metatarsal head and a reverse L-shaped medial capsulotomy is made followed by TALR or PCLR.

After TALR or PCLR, medial bunionectomy is performed. DMCO is made with the apex at distal metatarsal neck and angle of 60 to 90 degrees. The metatarsal head is laterally moved and fixed with one or 2 oblique headless compression screws.

Postoperative followup The patients are followed up at two weeks for removal of stitches, then 1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-months, 1-year, and annually after 1 year for radiographic , functional assessments, and evaluation of complications.

Power analysis for patient number With the assumption of mean HVA are 10 degrees for TALR group and 15 degrees for PCLR group at final followup, and a standard deviation of 8 degrees for both groups, the calculated effect size d is 0.625. In order to achieve the α error probability of 0.05 and power of 0.95, 68 participants in each group are necessary with a total of 136 participants in this study.

Statistical analysis In the comparisons between TALR and PCLR groups, the independent two samples t-test and the Mann-Whitney test are performed for normal and non-normal distributed data respectively, and the Fisher's exact test is performed for categorical data. P-values less than 0.05 is considered to be statistical significant. The statistical analyses are performed by using SPSS 25.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA).

Clinical relevance

  1. Compare the differences of surgical outcomes between TALR and PCLR. These results could offer valuable information for foot and ankle surgeon.
  2. If PCLR is not adequate to achieve satisfactory outcomes, the minimally invasive surgery using PCLR for HV is not recommended.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age equal or greater than 20 years
  • Hallux valgus angle (HVA) equal or greater than 20 degrees
  • Persistent symptoms after failed conservative treatment
  • Receiving DMCO for HV

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Underlying rheumatoid or other inflammatory arthritis
  • Hallux rigidus
  • Recurrent hallux valgus after previous surgery
  • First tarsometatarsal hypermobility
  • A positive intraoperative stress test for lateral soft tissue release

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Transarticular lateral release (TALR)
TALR The first toe is pulled distally for access into the lateral aspect of first MTPJ. A No.15 beaver blade is advanced from the medial incision laterally to divide the lateral capsule vertically and adductor hallucis tendon. Same intraoperative stress test is performed and recorded under fluoroscope to confirm correction.
TALR group: Transarticular lateral release as the distal soft tissue procedure
Active Comparator: Percutaneous lateral release (PCLR)
PCLR A 0.5 cm stab wound is made at lateral aspect of first MTPJ. A No. 15 beaver blade is advanced into the lateral side of MTPJ with a quarter of the blade inside the joint and verified with fluoroscope. The blade is turned laterally to face the adductor hallucis tendon. The adductor tendon is divided with lateral movement of the blade and varus manipulation of proximal phalanx. A click is heard as adequate release of adductor hallucis tendon. Same intraoperative stress test is performed and recorded under fluoroscope to confirm correction.
PCLR: Percutaneous soft tissue procedures as the distal soft tissue procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hallux valgus angle (HVA)(degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 1-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between proximal phalanx and 1st metatarsal
postoperative 1-month
hallux valgus angle (HVA)(degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 2-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between proximal phalanx and 1st metatarsal
postoperative 2-month
hallux valgus angle (HVA)(degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 3-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between proximal phalanx and 1st metatarsal
postoperative 3-month
hallux valgus angle (HVA)(degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 6-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between proximal phalanx and 1st metatarsal
postoperative 6-month
hallux valgus angle (HVA)(degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 12-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between proximal phalanx and 1st metatarsal
postoperative 12-month
hallux valgus angle (HVA)(degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 24-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between proximal phalanx and 1st metatarsal
postoperative 24-month
hallux valgus angle (HVA)(degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 36-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between proximal phalanx and 1st metatarsal
postoperative 36-month
intermetatarsal angle (IMA) 1-2 (degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 1-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal
postoperative 1-month
intermetatarsal angle (IMA) 1-2 (degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 2-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal
postoperative 2-month
intermetatarsal angle (IMA) 1-2 (degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 3-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal
postoperative 3-month
intermetatarsal angle (IMA) 1-2 (degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 6-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal
postoperative 6-month
intermetatarsal angle (IMA) 1-2 (degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 12-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal
postoperative 12-month
intermetatarsal angle (IMA) 1-2 (degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 24-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal
postoperative 24-month
intermetatarsal angle (IMA) 1-2 (degrees)
Time Frame: postoperative 36-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, angle between 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal
postoperative 36-month
sesamoid position
Time Frame: postoperative 1-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, the location of the medial sesamoid with progressive lateral subluxation from grade one to seven according to the classification system of Hardy and Clapham
postoperative 1-month
sesamoid position
Time Frame: postoperative 2-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, the location of the medial sesamoid with progressive lateral subluxation from grade one to seven according to the classification system of Hardy and Clapham
postoperative 2-month
sesamoid position
Time Frame: postoperative 3-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, the location of the medial sesamoid with progressive lateral subluxation from grade one to seven according to the classification system of Hardy and Clapham
postoperative 3-month
sesamoid position
Time Frame: postoperative 6-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, the location of the medial sesamoid with progressive lateral subluxation from grade one to seven according to the classification system of Hardy and Clapham
postoperative 6-month
sesamoid position
Time Frame: postoperative 12-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, the location of the medial sesamoid with progressive lateral subluxation from grade one to seven according to the classification system of Hardy and Clapham
postoperative 12-month
sesamoid position
Time Frame: postoperative 24-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, the location of the medial sesamoid with progressive lateral subluxation from grade one to seven according to the classification system of Hardy and Clapham
postoperative 24-month
sesamoid position
Time Frame: postoperative 36-month
weightbearing dorsoplantar radiograph, the location of the medial sesamoid with progressive lateral subluxation from grade one to seven according to the classification system of Hardy and Clapham
postoperative 36-month
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: postoperative 3-months
pain score, (0-10, the lower the better)
postoperative 3-months
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: postoperative 6-months
pain score, (0-10, the lower the better)
postoperative 6-months
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: postoperative 12-months
pain score, (0-10, the lower the better)
postoperative 12-months
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: postoperative 24-months
pain score, (0-10, the lower the better)
postoperative 24-months
visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: postoperative 36-months
pain score, (0-10, the lower the better)
postoperative 36-months
hallux-metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale of American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society (AOFAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 3-months
functional score, 0-100, the higher the better
postoperative 3-months
hallux-metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale of American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society (AOFAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 6-months
functional score, 0-100, the higher the better
postoperative 6-months
hallux-metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale of American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society (AOFAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 12-months
functional score, 0-100, the higher the better
postoperative 12-months
hallux-metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale of American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society (AOFAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 24-months
functional score, 0-100, the higher the better
postoperative 24-months
hallux-metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale of American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society (AOFAS)
Time Frame: postoperative 36-months
functional score, 0-100, the higher the better
postoperative 36-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rate of osteonecrosis of first metatarsal head
Time Frame: 12-month
postoperative complications
12-month
rate of osteonecrosis of first metatarsal head
Time Frame: 24-month
postoperative complications
24-month
rate of osteonecrosis of first metatarsal head
Time Frame: 36-month
postoperative complications
36-month
rate of numbness of hallux
Time Frame: 12-month
postoperative complication
12-month
rate of numbness of hallux
Time Frame: 24-month
postoperative complication
24-month
rate of numbness of hallux
Time Frame: 36-month
postoperative complication
36-month
rate of infection
Time Frame: 12-month
postoperative complication
12-month
rate of infection
Time Frame: 24-month
postoperative complication
24-month
rate of infection
Time Frame: 36-month
postoperative complication
36-month
rate of first MTPJ arthritis
Time Frame: 12-month
postoperative complication
12-month
rate of first MTPJ arthritis
Time Frame: 24-month
postoperative complication
24-month
rate of first MTPJ arthritis
Time Frame: 36-month
postoperative complication
36-month
rate of recurrent hallux valgus
Time Frame: 12-month
postoperative complication, hallux valgus angle equal or greater than 20 degrees
12-month
rate of recurrent hallux valgus
Time Frame: 24-month
postoperative complication, hallux valgus angle equal or greater than 20 degrees
24-month
rate of recurrent hallux valgus
Time Frame: 36-month
postoperative complication, hallux valgus angle equal or greater than 20 degrees
36-month
rate of hallux varus
Time Frame: 12-month
postoperative complication
12-month
rate of hallux varus
Time Frame: 24-month
postoperative complication
24-month
rate of hallux varus
Time Frame: 36-month
postoperative complication
36-month
rate of reoperations
Time Frame: 12-month
postoperative complication
12-month
rate of reoperations
Time Frame: 24-month
postoperative complication
24-month
rate of reoperations
Time Frame: 36-month
postoperative complication
36-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chao-Ching Chiang, MD, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hallux Valgus

Clinical Trials on Distal soft tissue procedure with TALR

Subscribe