- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04617678
A Comprehensive Approach to Head and Neck Cancer Prehabilitation
October 19, 2023 updated by: Sanford Health
Head and neck cancer accounts for 3% of malignancies in the United States.
However, the diagnosis and treatment for head and neck cancer is considered to be debilitating.
Not because of its morbidity, but due to the extremely rigorous treatment course which has a profound impact on patients physical, social, and emotional functioning.
Disfigurement and sensorimotor deficits further compound this impact.
Head and neck cancer patients contend with treatments that can significantly affect their quality of life.
Treatment regularly results in decreased functional capacity and decreased quality of life.
Physical impairments are manifested through, but not limited to, disfigurement, deconditioning, communication issues, "swallowing, speech, breathing, and cancer-related fatigue".
Premorbid factors such as preexisting anxiety and depression, chemical dependency, financial barriers, and lack of social support system are unique obstacles to the head and neck cancer population impacting treatment and outcomes.
Due to these factors, patients experience higher rates of anxiety and depression, psychological distress, and fear of cancer recurrence.
In fact, "compared with other survivors of cancer, head and neck cancer survivors are almost 2 times more likely to die from suicide".
In view of the aforementioned research, Roger Maris Cancer Center's head and neck cancer will implement a prehabilitation program that evaluates each patient using standardized screening tools and provide personalized education and interventions.
This project evaluates a more comprehensive and proactive multidisciplinary approach to improve treatment and outcomes in head and neck cancer patients.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Amy Schmidt, RN
- Phone Number: (701) 234-7667
- Email: amy.schmidt@sanfordhealth.org
Study Locations
-
-
North Dakota
-
Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58104
- Sanford Health
-
-
South Dakota
-
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57104
- Sanford Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Equal to or greater than 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of head and neck cancer
- Actively pursuing cancer treatment with a curative intent
- Willing and able to provide written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with cardiac arrhythmia with implanted pacemaker
- Patients with other implanted electronic equipment/device
- Patients undergoing external defibrillation
- Pregnant women (per BIS instructions for use, pregnant women should not participate)
- Patient weight exceeding 375 lbs.
- Patient has a metal allergy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Prospective Prehabilitation
Prospectively enrolling patients into a prehabilitation program for head and neck cancer.
|
We will assess whether prehabilitation intervention helps mitigate adverse symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression, suicidality, distress, nutritional status, dysphagia, sarcopenia, and well-being) on a sample of head and neck cancer patients.
Subjects will attend a Prepare for Surgery Heal Faster session and meet with a physical therapist, registered dietician, speech language pathologist, and masters of social work at pre-treatment, 6-8 weeks post-treatment, and 5-6 months post-treatment completion.
|
No Intervention: Prospective Control
Prospectively enrolling patients to a control arm with no intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the BHS-6 to after treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
The Behavioral Health Screening 6 (BHS-6) is a validated, self-report instrument assessing psychological health.
Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress.
Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the C-SSRS to after treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a validated, self-report instrument assessing suicidality.
Higher scores indicate greater suicidality.
Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the NCCN Distress Thermometer after treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer is a validated, self-report instrument assessing psychological health.
Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress.
Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the MDADI to after treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of dysphasia and overall functioning.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning.
Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
Difference between treatment and control group, from baseline in the FACT-H&N (Version 4) to after treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
The FACT-H&N (Version 4) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of dysphasia and overall functioning.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning.
Difference = (Treatment score - Control score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; and 6-months follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Impact of sarcopenia on functioning
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months
|
Sarcopenia will be measured using bioimpedence spectroscopy technology (BIS), a validated noninvasive measure of volume of fluids in various parts of the body.
Functional assessments (sit to stand, grip strength, and two-minute walk test) will be tested as possible predictors of sarcopenia.
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months
|
Difference between treatment and control group on sarcopenia measures
Time Frame: Post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months
|
Sarcopenia measures collected via computed tomography will be used to compare patients who completed the prehabilitation program and those who have not.
|
Post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the BHS-6.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The Behavioral Health Screening 6 (BHS-6) is a validated self-report measure of psychological health, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the C-SSRS.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a validated self-report measure of psychological health, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the NCCN Distress Thermometer.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer is a validated self-report measure of psychological health, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the 2-min walk test.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The 2-min walk test is a validated objective measure of physical functioning.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the 30 seconds sit to stand.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The 30 seconds sit to stand is a validated objective measure of physical functioning.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the grip strength.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The grip strength is a validated objective measure of physical functioning.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the NFPE.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The Nutrition Focused Physical Exam (NFPE) is a validated objective measure of physical functioning.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the MDADI.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of dysphasia and overall functioning.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the BIS.
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The Bioelectic impedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a validated objective measure of physical functioning.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Change from baseline to after treatment on the FACT-H&N (Version 4).
Time Frame: Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
The FACT-H&N (Version 4) is a validated, self-report instrument of functional assessments of overall functioning.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life and higher day-to-day functioning.
Change = (Post-treatment score - Baseline score).
|
Baseline; post-treatment, ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months; 6 months follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cheryl Hysjulien, PsyD, Sanford Health
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, Currier GW, Melvin GA, Greenhill L, Shen S, Mann JJ. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704.
- Minnella EM, Awasthi R, Loiselle SE, Agnihotram RV, Ferri LE, Carli F. Effect of Exercise and Nutrition Prehabilitation on Functional Capacity in Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1645.
- Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Jul;127(7):870-6.
- D'Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, Cella DF, Long SA. Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 May;122(5):482-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890170018005.
- List MA, D'Antonio LL, Cella DF, Siston A, Mumby P, Haraf D, Vokes E. The Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Scale. A study of utility and validity. Cancer. 1996 Jun 1;77(11):2294-301. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:113.0.CO;2-S.
- Samuel SR, Maiya AG, Fernandes DJ, Guddattu V, Saxena PUP, Kurian JR, Lin PJ, Mustian KM. Effectiveness of exercise-based rehabilitation on functional capacity and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemo-radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3913-3920. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04750-z. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
- Stenson, K. M. (2019). Epidemiology and risk factors for head and neck cancer. UpToDate. Retrieved, November 15, 2019 from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/epidemiology-and-risk-factors-for-head-and-neck-cancer.
- Osazuwa-Peters N, Simpson MC, Zhao L, Boakye EA, Olomukoro SI, Deshields T, Loux TM, Varvares MA, Schootman M. Suicide risk among cancer survivors: Head and neck versus other cancers. Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4072-4079. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31675. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
- Beck ACC, Passchier E, Retel VP, Stuiver MM, van der Molen L, Klop WMC, Navran A, van Harten WH, van den Brekel MWM. Study protocol of a prospective multicenter study comparing (cost-)effectiveness of a tailored interdisciplinary head and neck rehabilitation program to usual supportive care for patients treated with concomitant chemo- or bioradiotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5874-z.
- Jung AR, Roh JL, Kim JS, Kim SB, Choi SH, Nam SY, Kim SY. Prognostic value of body composition on recurrence and survival of advanced-stage head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
- Barrett-Bernstein M, Carli F, Gamsa A, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Minnella E, Ramanakumar AV, Tourian L. Depression and functional status in colorectal cancer patients awaiting surgery: Impact of a multimodal prehabilitation program. Health Psychol. 2019 Oct;38(10):900-909. doi: 10.1037/hea0000781. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
- Mordarski BA, Hand RK, Wolff J, Steiber AL. Increased Knowledge, Self-Reported Comfort, and Malnutrition Diagnosis and Reimbursement as a Result of the Nutrition-Focused Physical Exam Hands-On Training Workshop. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Nov;117(11):1822-1828. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.362. Epub 2017 Aug 16. No abstract available.
- Sealy MJ, Dechaphunkul T, van der Schans CP, Krijnen WP, Roodenburg JLN, Walker J, Jager-Wittenaar H, Baracos VE. Low muscle mass is associated with early termination of chemotherapy related to toxicity in patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Nutr. 2020 Feb;39(2):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.02.029. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
- Wall LR, Ward EC, Cartmill B, Hill AJ. Physiological changes to the swallowing mechanism following (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2013 Dec;28(4):481-493. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9491-8.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 21, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 30, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
November 5, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 23, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 19, 2023
Last Verified
October 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CTR H&N Cancer Prehab
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cancer of Head and Neck
-
Robert FerrisAmgenCompletedHead and Neck Cancer | Cancer of Head and Neck | Head Cancer | Neck Cancer | Neoplasms, Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head and Neck | Cancer of Neck | Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasms | Neck Neoplasms | Cancer of the Head | Cancer of the Neck | UADT Neoplasms | Cancer of Head | Head Neoplasms | Head, Neck Neoplasms | Neoplasms, Head and other conditionsUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingHead and Neck Cancer | Head and Neck Neoplasms | Cancer of Head and Neck | Neoplasms, Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head and NeckEgypt
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbOno Pharma USA IncCompletedCancer of Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head | Cancer of the NeckJapan
-
AstraZenecaCompletedCancer of Head and NeckSpain
-
Washington University School of MedicineCelgene CorporationActive, not recruitingHead and Neck Cancer | Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck | Cancer of Head and Neck | Neoplasms, Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head and Neck | Carcinoma, Squamous Cell of the Head and NeckUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamAventis PharmaceuticalsCompletedHead and Neck Cancer | Cancer of Head and Neck | Head Cancer | Neck Cancer | Neck NeoplasmsUnited States
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbActive, not recruitingSquamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck; Head and Neck Cancer; Head and Neck Carcinoma; Cancer of the Head and NeckFrance
-
Washington University School of MedicineTerminatedHead and Neck Cancer | Cancer of the Head and NeckUnited States
-
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRecruitingHead and Neck CancerUnited Kingdom
-
University of ChicagoCompletedHead and Neck CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Prehabilitation Program
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedCongenital Heart DiseaseEgypt
-
Montreal General HospitalRecruitingThe Impact of Physical Exercise on Sleep in Colorectal Cancer Patients During Prehabilitation PeriodSurgery | Colo-rectal CancerCanada
-
Hopital FochCompletedCancer | SurgeryFrance
-
University of MalagaAndaluz Health ServiceUnknown
-
GERCOR - Multidisciplinary Oncology Cooperative...Not yet recruitingEsophageal Cancer | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingEsophageal Cancer | Esophageal NeoplasmsUnited States
-
University of CologneDepartment of General, Visceral, Tumor and Transplant Surgery, University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingTransthoracic EsophagectomyGermany
-
Institut Paoli-CalmettesNot yet recruiting
-
Zealand University HospitalDanish Cancer Society; University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; Region... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUnknownCancer | FrailtyCanada