A Patient-centered Communication Tool (UR-GOAL) for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Their Caregivers, and Their Oncologists (UR-GOAL 1)

March 29, 2026 updated by: Kah Poh Loh, University of Rochester
This is a pilot study to evaluate the usability and feasibility of a patient-centered communication tool (University of Rochester-Geriatric Oncology Assessment for acute myeloid Leukemia or UR-GOAL) among 15 older patients with AML, their caregivers, and oncologists.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Older adults with AML and their caregivers may benefit from help and support in understanding their treatment options. This pilot study seeks to evaluate the usability and feasibility of the UR-GOAL communication tool. The UR-GOAL tool will incorporate conjoint analysis to elicit patient preferences as well as assessments of fitness and prognostic awareness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14623
        • University of Rochester Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Patients:

  • Age ≥60 years (conventional definition of older age in AML)
  • Newly diagnosed AML
  • Considering treatment
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • English-speaking

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • Selected by the patient when asked if there is a "family member, partner, friend or caregiver [age 21 or older] with whom you discuss or who can be helpful in health-related matters;" patients who cannot identify such a person ("caregiver") can be eligible for the study. A caregiver need not be someone who lives with the patient or provides direct hands-on care. A caregiver can be any person who provides support (in any way) to the patient.
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • English-speaking

Inclusion Criteria for Oncologists:

  • A practicing oncologist
  • At least one of their patients are recruited to the study
  • English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria: None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Experimental Arm: single
The UR-GOAL tool will incorporate conjoint analysis to elicit patient preferences as well as assessments of fitness and prognostic awareness.
The UR-GOAL tool will incorporate conjoint analysis to elicit patient preferences as well as assessments of fitness and prognostic awarene

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility (Recruitment Rates)
Time Frame: Four weeks
Percentage of patients who consented to the study ultimately completed the study intervention and post-intervention assessment
Four weeks
Usefulness
Time Frame: Four weeks
Usefulness was assessed using the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (mean score range from 1 to 5, and higher scores indicate greater usefulness)
Four weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-post Changes in the Following Outcomes:Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)
Time Frame: Four weeks
A valid and reliable assessment of perceived self-efficacy of older patients interacting with physicians; score on 5-item scale, ranging 5-25; higher score corresponds to greater perceived efficacy. Pre-post changes from baseline to four weeks.
Four weeks
Pre-post Changes in the Following Outcomes: General Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: Four weeks
A 7-item screening tool for anxiety; ranging 7-21; higher score corresponds to greater anxiety symptoms. Pre-post changes from baseline to four weeks.
Four weeks
Pre-post Changes in the Following Outcomes: Geriatric Depression Scale-15
Time Frame: Four Weeks
A 15-item valid and reliable screening tool for depression in older adults. This will be used for patients; ranging 0-15; higher score corresponds to greater depressive symptoms. Pre-post changes from baseline to four weeks.
Four Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kah Poh Loh, MD, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A complete and final study protocol will be made publicly available through the University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Oncology Research Program Research Base Protocol and Data Sharing Committee. The full protocol and data will be made publicly available no later than the publication date of the study findings from the final dataset. The protocol will include a detailed description of the study population, hypotheses tested, measurement and assessment information, data definitions and codes, and the analysis plan utilized. We will be collecting identifying information. The final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing. Published papers will be made available in portable document format.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available for 7 years from accrual of the first subject.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Behavioral: UR-GOAL communication tool

Subscribe