Timing of FFR-guided PCI for Non-IRA in STEMI and MVD (OPTION-STEMI)

May 24, 2025 updated by: Min Chul Kim, Chonnam National University Hospital

OPtimal TIming of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete RevascularizatiON for Non-Infarct Related Artery in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Disease (OPTION-STEMI)

Patients with STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) with multivessel disease which have PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention)-suitable non-IRA (infarct related artery) will be randomized to immediate complete revascularization group or staged revascularization group by 1:1 fashion. Non-IRA lesion which have equal or more than 70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation will be revascularized without FFR (fractional flow reserve) evaluation. Non-IRA lesion with diameter stenosis 50-70% by visual estimation will be evaluated using FFR device. In case of FFR value more than 0.8, non-IRA lesion wll be deferred without PCI. If FFR value was equal or less than 0.8, non-IRA lesion will be revascularized.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study objectives:

To determine the optimal timing of non-infarct related artery (IRA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the aid of FFR (fractional flow reserve) (immediate complete revascularization during primary angioplasty vs. staged procedure for non-IRA PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease (MVD).

Study hypothesis:

Complete revascularization (CR) at index procedure is not inferior to staged in-hospital CR in patients with STEMI and MVD who undergoing FFR-guided revascularization for non-IRA.

Background:

Multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) is a common clinical condition, about 40-65% of all primary angioplasty, encountered by interventional cardiologists in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and it is associated with poorer clinical outcomes than single-vessel disease. Older guidelines recommended culprit-vessel only revascularization (CVR) during primary angioplasty, except in patient that are hemodynamically unstable. Several recent studies have reported improved clinical outcomes in these patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and others reported promising results from CVR followed by elective second-stage PCI at non-infarct related artery (non-IRA) with significant stenosis. However, there has been no consensus of optimal revascularization strategy in this circumstance.

Recently, several large-scaled randomized controlled trials were conducted about this issue, and confirmed the benefit of immediate complete revascularization during primary angioplasty compared to CVR. Furthermore, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI at non-IRA was more effective than angiography-guided PCI at non-IRA for reducing repeat revascularization by either immediate multivessel PCI strategy or staged PCI strategy in the other trials.

Although FFR is a well-known tool to evaluate significant ischemia of moderate stenosis, the most studies regarding FFR enrolled patients without acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Timing of non-IRA PCI is also uncertain. After promising results of above-mentioned randomized trials, current guideline recommendation of multivessel PCI (immediate or staged) was upgraded. However, current guidelines simply mentioned about the timing of non-IRA PCI which recommends complete revascularization during initial hospitalization by either of immediate of staged PCI strategy.

Therefore, the investigators planned to perform prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immediate complete revascularization (PCI for both IRA and non-IRA during primary angioplasty) compared to staged PCI strategy of non-IRA (primary angioplasty for IRA followed by non-IRA PCI after several days). PCI procedure at non-IRA with diameter stenosis between 50 and 70% should be conducted with the aid of FFR, and non-IRA with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% will be revascularized without FFR.

Study procedure:

Patients will be randomized after primary PCI for IRA. Non-IRA lesion which have equal or more than 70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation will be revascularized without FFR evaluation. Non-IRA lesion with diameter stenosis 50-70% by visual estimation will be evaluated using FFR device. In case of FFR value more than 0.8, non-IRA lesion wll be deferred without PCI. If FFR value was equal or less than 0.8, non-IRA lesion will be revascularized.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

994

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bucheon, Korea, Republic of
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital
      • Changwon, Korea, Republic of
        • Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Yeongnam University Medical Center
      • Gangneung, Korea, Republic of
        • GangNeung Asan Hospital
      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
        • Chonnam National University Hospital
      • Jeonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Chonbuk National University Hospital
      • Jeonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Presbyterian Medical Center
      • Jinju, Korea, Republic of
        • Gyeongsang National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Kyung Hee University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Koera University Guro Hospital
      • Suncheon, Korea, Republic of
        • St. Carollo General Hospital
      • Uijeongbu, Korea, Republic of
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital
      • Wonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Yonsei University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 19 years old
  • ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

    • ST-segment elevation in at least 2 contiguous leads or,
    • New onset left bundle branch block
  • Primary PCI within 12 hours after symptom development
  • Multivessel disease: Non-IRA with at least 2.5 mm diameter and 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimation
  • Patient's or protector's agreement about study design and the risk of PCI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiogenic shock at initial presentation or after treatment of IRA
  • Unprotected left main coronary artery disease with at least 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimation
  • TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow at non-IRA ≤ 2
  • Severe procedural complications (e.g. persistent no-reflow phenomenon, coronary artery perforation) which restricts study enrollment by operators' decision
  • Non-IRA lesion not suitable for PCI treatment by operators' decision
  • Chronic total occlusion at non-IRA
  • History of anaphylaxis to contrast agent
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Life expectancy < 1-year
  • Severe valvular disease
  • History of CABG (coronary artery bypass graft), or planned CABG
  • Fibrinolysis before admission
  • Severe asthma
  • Patient's refusal to participate in study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Staged in-hospital CR (complete revascularization)
Non-infarct related artery (IRA) will be revascularized in other day (during hospitalization) after PCI for IRA. Non-IRA lesion which have equal or more than 70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation will be revascularized without FFR evaluation. Non-IRA lesion with diameter stenosis 50-70% by visual estimation will be evaluated using FFR device. In case of FFR value more than 0.8, non-IRA lesion wll be deferred without PCI. If FFR value was equal or less than 0.8, non-IRA lesion will be revascularized.
Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease will be randomized after primary PCI for IRA. All patients will be randomized to immediate complete revascularization group or staged revascularization group by 1:1 fashion. Non-IRA lesion which have equal or more than 70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation will be revascularized without FFR evaluation. Non-IRA lesion with diameter stenosis 50-70% by visual estimation will be evaluated using FFR device. In case of FFR value more than 0.8, non-IRA lesion wll be deferred without PCI. If FFR value was equal or less than 0.8, non-IRA lesion will be revascularized.
Experimental: Immediate CR (complete revascularization)
Non-infarct related artery (IRA) will be revascularized immediately after PCI for IRA (during primary PCI). Non-IRA lesion which have equal or more than 70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation will be revascularized without FFR evaluation. Non-IRA lesion with diameter stenosis 50-70% by visual estimation will be evaluated using FFR device. In case of FFR value more than 0.8, non-IRA lesion wll be deferred without PCI. If FFR value was equal or less than 0.8, non-IRA lesion will be revascularized.
Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease will be randomized after primary PCI for IRA. All patients will be randomized to immediate complete revascularization group or staged revascularization group by 1:1 fashion. Non-IRA lesion which have equal or more than 70% diameter stenosis by visual estimation will be revascularized without FFR evaluation. Non-IRA lesion with diameter stenosis 50-70% by visual estimation will be evaluated using FFR device. In case of FFR value more than 0.8, non-IRA lesion wll be deferred without PCI. If FFR value was equal or less than 0.8, non-IRA lesion will be revascularized.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative incidence rate of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or all unplanned revascularization at 1 year from baseline
Time Frame: Index admission to 12 months
Composite endpoint of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or all unplanned revascularization at 1 year after index percutaneous coronary intervention
Index admission to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of contrast-induced nephropathy during index admission
Time Frame: During index admission
Rate of contrast-induced nephropathy during index admission
During index admission
Cumulative incidence rate of all unplanned revascularization at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of all unplanned revascularization at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of target-lesion revascularization at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of target-lesion revascularization at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of target-vessel revascularization at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of target-vessel revascularization at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of non-target vessel revascularization at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of non-target vessel revascularization at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of all-cause death at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of all-cause death at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of cardiac death at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of cardiac death at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of non-cardiac death at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of non-cardiac death at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of hospitalization for unstable angina at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of hospitalization for unstable angina at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of hospitalization for heart failure at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of hospitalization for heart failure at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of non-fatal myocardial infarction at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of non-fatal myocardial infarction at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of major bleeding (BARC definitions type 3 or 5) at each visit
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of major bleeding (BARC definitions type 3 or 5) at each visit
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Cumulative incidence rate of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or all unplanned revascularization at 1 year from baseline
Time Frame: Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Composite endpoint of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or all unplanned revascularization at 1 year after index percutaneous coronary intervention
Index admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Youngkeun Ahn, MD, Chonnam National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction, Acute

Clinical Trials on Staged in-hospital or Immediate complete revascularization

Subscribe