Revisiting A Mobile Intervention to Reduce Pain and Improve Health (MORPH-II)

July 14, 2025 updated by: Jason Fanning, Wake Forest University

MORPH II: Revisiting A Mobile Intervention to Reduce Pain and Improve Health (MORPH)

Chronic pain is a pervasive and costly health condition among older adults that is associated with wide-ranging adverse health outcomes including falls, declining mobility, and increasing functional disability. Obesity exacerbates many of these health issues, contributing to a higher frequency of intractable pain episodes, increased pain severity, multi-site pain, and the use of stronger opioid medications compared to normal weight individuals with chronic pain. In addition, older adults who suffer from chronic pain are significantly more sedentary than those without chronic pain. Despite evidence relating increased sedentary behavior to pain, non-pharmacological treatments have largely focused on structured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by way of conventional forms of exercise.

Recent evidence from an intervention designed to decreased sedentary behavior (SB) demonstrated the approach is effective in preventing weight regain following weight loss. A subsequent study-a mobile intervention to reduce pain and improve health (MORPH: Wake Forest Baptist Health institutional review board [IRB] 00046364)-demonstrated that a primarily home-delivered intervention (9 of 12 delivered in home; 3 of 12 delivered in a research center) supported by technology can produce significant weight loss, reductions in sedentary time, increases in daily steps, less pain intensity, and better physical function compared with a waitlist control. MORPH included a focus on dietary weight loss plus movement across the day through a combination of group telecoaching and a custom mobile health (mHealth) application, but results indicated that participants did not internalize the day-long movement intervention. Instead, they appeared to achieve a greater number of steps through conventional walking exercise, allowing for high levels of sitting, stiffness, and pain.

MORPH concluded with a two-group randomized controlled pilot trial (RCT) in obese (BMI=30-45 kg/m2), low-active, older (55-85 years) adults with chronic pain who were randomized to either 12-weeks of active intervention or a wait-list control. This study represents an extension of MORPH-hereafter MORPH II-with the intention of immediately addressing limitations in the original MORPH study. Participants will be randomize 30 older, low-active, obese adults to the active intervention or to a standard control for 12 weeks. To build upon the last phase of MORPH, the research team will deliver this intervention fully remotely, providing cellular data-equipped tablet computers to protect participant safety and reduce technical issues that may arise due to lack of face-to-face orientation appointments. Given the current COVID-19 climate, the investigators have chosen to deliver the entire intervention remotely. The investigators are implementing intensive individual coaching throughout the program and greater emphasis on frequent movement to drive better uptake of a day-long movement program and will transition participants to a 12-week no-contact follow-up to observe whether behavior change sustains following completion of the focused intervention.

This study is couched within a contemporary engineering-inspired design framework-the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST)-which emphasizes rapid identification of successful intervention components and the removal or redesign of components that are either ineffective or perceived as a nuisance. To this end, the study team will carry momentum from MORPH into MORPH II wherein the team will assess the impact of a fully remote MORPH intervention with the addition of high-contact coaching on pain ratings, physical function, levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior, and body weight. This is particularly timely given limited access to center-based resources for many during the COVID-19 pandemic, and especially those who are high-risk, including older adults with chronic pain.

Aims and Hypotheses Specific Aim 1: To conduct a pilot RCT to provide initial evidence for the effect size associated with the proposed intervention on pain, sitting time, and daily steps. Investigators will also explore the impact of this program on social connection (i.e., relatedness) and physical function.

Hypothesis 1: It is expected that the provision of the in-home application to contribute to clinically meaningful improvements in pain ratings and steps and a reduction in daily sedentary time compared to the control condition.

Specific Aim 2: To examine whether a socially mediated, home-delivered health intervention produces lasting behavior change over a 12-week no-contact period.

Hypothesis 2: It is expected that levels of physical activity at week 24 will remain meaningfully improved over baseline in the intervention condition relative to the control.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27109
        • Wake Forest University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 55-85 years;
  • Corrected (based on phone self-reported height and weight) BMI=30-45 kg/m2;
  • Has data coverage in the home;
  • Weight stable-reporting no loss or gain (±5%) in past 6 months;
  • Willing to provide informed consent;
  • Agree to all study procedures and assessments;
  • Owns an Android or Apple smartphone;
  • Self-reported pain in 2 or more of the following sites on most days for the previous 3 months: back, neck, shoulders, hips and/or knees

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dependent on cane or walker to walk a short distance; >1 fall (injurious or non-injurious) in past year (does not include falls where participant was pushed/pulled by another object and was not injured)
  • Vision insufficient to read a smartphone screen, unable to read
  • Participation in regular resistance training and/or > 20 mins on 2+ d/w of aerobic exercise in past 6 months
  • No contraindication to exercise
  • TICS-M score ≤ 31
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (>160/90 mmHg);
  • Current or recent past (within 1 year) severe symptomatic heart disease, uncontrolled angina, stroke, osteoporosis, chronic respiratory disease requiring oxygen, neurological or hematological disease; cancer requiring treatment in past yr, except non-melanoma skin cancers
  • Regular use of: growth hormones, oral steroids, or prescription osteoporosis medications
  • Current participation in other research study targeting pain, physical activity, or weight loss.
  • Previous participation in MORPH I- phase 1 or 2
  • Joint replacement or orthopedic surgery within previous 6 months or planning to have orthopedic surgery in the next 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MORPH
Participants engage in 12 weeks of group and 1-on-1 coaching meant to promote physical activity throughout the day and caloric restriction. Participants engage with a custom smartphone application, use a smart scale and physical activity monitor, and meet using video conference software. At the end of 12 weeks, participants are provided with tools to continue meeting virtually on their own if desired, and will be followed for an additional 12-week maintenance phase.
A 12-week movement and caloric restriction intervention meant to reduce pain and body weight.
No Intervention: Control
This condition receives the wearable activity monitor and simply asked to use it and continue in their daily lives for 24 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline to week 12
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) 3-item pain intensity scale. Final scores represent t-scores (mean of 50, standard deviation of 10) where greater scores represent greater pain intensity relative to a nationally representative sample.
Baseline to week 12
Pain Interference
Time Frame: Baseline to week 12
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) 8-item pain interference scale. Final scores represent t-scores (mean of 50, standard deviation of 10) where greater scores represent greater pain interference relative to a nationally representative sample.
Baseline to week 12
Steps
Time Frame: Baseline to week 12
Daily steps as recorded by the ActivPAL accelerometer.
Baseline to week 12
Sedentary time
Time Frame: Baseline to week 12
Daily minutes spent sedentary as recorded by the ActivPAL accelerometer.
Baseline to week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Steps
Time Frame: Baseline to week 24
Daily steps at 24 weeks as recorded by the ActivPAL accelerometer.
Baseline to week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Function
Time Frame: Baseline to week 12
Physical function as assessed by the short physical performance battery. Scores are on a scale of 0 - 12 with higher scores representing better physical functioning.
Baseline to week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jason Fanning, PhD, Wake Forest University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00023965

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on MORPH

Subscribe