Improving Our Understanding of Respiratory Muscle Training to Facilitate Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU (TrainToWean)

March 16, 2026 updated by: Daniel Langer, KU Leuven

Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving treatment frequently applied in intensive care unit (ICU). Nonetheless, by putting at rest the respiratory muscles, it can lead to respiratory muscle weakness and atrophy, which are accompanied by prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, difficult weaning and increased ICU mortality. Despite a strong theoretical rationale and some evidence supporting the use of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) to address respiratory muscle weakness and atrophy, the optimal approach to IMT remains largely uncertain. In fact, mechanistic studies evaluating physiological adaptations that occur in respiratory muscles of mechanically ventilated patients in response to different training regimens have not been conducted so far.

The aim of this study is to comprehensively investigate changes in respiratory muscle function in response to three different conditions that patients will be exposed to during their period of weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A majority of mechanically ventilated patients develop respiratory muscle weakness during critical illness.

The potential value of implementing rehabilitative interventions for respiratory muscle conditioning are supported by observations showing that respiratory muscle weakness is associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, difficult weaning, and increased ICU mortality.

Despite a strong theoretical rationale and some evidence supporting its use, mechanistic studies evaluating physiological adaptations that occur in respiratory muscles of mechanically ventilated patients in response to different training regimens have not been performed so far. Consequently, the characterization of IMT modalities and of the optimal approach to IMT remain largely uncertain.

To date, the great part of the studies on the topic employed an external mechanical threshold device to perform trainings, in general adopting loads ranging between 10-50% of maximal inspiratory strength (i.e. maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax)). Intermittent spontaneous breathing periods (e.g. using partially assisted or spontaneous modes of ventilation) are also frequently applied as an activating stimulus to the respiratory muscles during periods of mechanical ventilation.

A tapered flow resistive load (TFRL) device (POWERbreathe KH2, HaB International, UK) has been already tested and implemented at University Hospital Leuven as a way of loading respiratory muscles in ICU patients. The TFRL approach represents a potential more optimal way of loading the respiratory muscles in patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation. Such a loading approach allows higher inspiratory tidal volumes to be reached and higher work and power generation during trainings, by adapting to changes in length-tension characteristics of the inspiratory muscles during inspiration.

With regards to training modalities, high-intensity IMT modalities by applying loads ranging between 30 and 50 %PImax, have not yet been proven to be associated with better improvements in respiratory muscle strength compared to low-intensity (sham) IMT modalities at loads not exceeding 10 %PImax.

On the other hand, no studies are available that assessed changes in respiratory muscle function beyond assessments of respiratory muscle strength in response to training.

Additionally, no training studies have tried to quantify the intrinsic loading of the patients (i.e. elastic and resistive resistances of the chest wall and the lungs) that muscles are exposed to in between periods of additional loading applied during IMT sessions.

The aim of this study is to comprehensively investigate changes in respiratory muscle function in response to three different conditions that difficult to wean patients will be exposed to during their weaning period. The complementary quantification of the entity of loading that respiratory muscles are bearing during assisted, spontaneous and resistive breathing would provide important novel insights on the optimization of IMT stimulus in different patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Leuven
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Langer, PT, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Difficult and prolonged weaning patients
  • Adequate oxygenation
  • Febrile temperature < 38ºC
  • Hemodynamic stability
  • Stable blood pressure
  • No or minimal vasopressors
  • No myocardial ischemia
  • Adequate hemoglobin and mentation
  • Resolution of disease acute phase
  • Able to follow simple verbal commands related to IMT
  • Mechanically ventilated via a tracheostomy or endotracheal tube

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing neuromuscular disease
  • Agitation
  • Hemodynamically instable (arrhythmia, decompensated heart failure, coronary insufficiency)
  • Hemoptysis
  • Diaphoresis
  • Spinal cord injury above T8
  • Use of any type of home MV support prior to hospitalization
  • Skeletal pathology that impairs chest wall movements
  • Poor general prognosis or fatal outcome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Usual Care (UC)
Intermittent spontaneous breathing periods
Intermittent spontaneous breathing periods
Experimental: UC + High-intensity inspiratory muscle training (HI-IMT)
UC + Supervised daily sessions of training including 4 sets of 6-10 full vital capacity breaths against an external load using a tapered flow resistive device (POWERbreathe KH2, HaB International, UK). The maximum tolerable resistance allowing patients to inhale at least 70% of their inspiratory vital capacity will be chosen and progressively increased throughout the training period.
Experimental: UC + Low-intensity inspiratory muscle training (LI-IMT) (sham IMT)
UC + superrvised daily sessions of training including 4 sets of 6-10 breaths at the lowest external imposable load with the tapered flow resistive device (POWERbreathe KH2, HaB International, UK) (i.e. 3 cmH2O).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (PImax)
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Using a unidirectional valve which will be connected to the patient's tracheostomy tube or endotracheal tube for an uninterrupted period of 25 seconds.
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm mobility, thickness and thickening fraction by ultrasounds
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Assessment by diaphragm ultrasounds
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in contractile material and structural alteration of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies using Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) staining.
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in fiber proportion of sternocleidomastoid muscle fibers
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies with immunostaining of the myosin heavy chain.
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in size of sternocleidomastoid muscle fibers
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies with immunostaining of the myosin heavy chain.
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in amount of satellite cells of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies with Pax7 immunostaining
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in amount of fibrotic tissue of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies with Masson staining
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change of gene expression of atrophy/hypertrophy related pathways of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies with RT2 profiler PCR array skeletal muscle, Qiagen
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in cell proliferation of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies cell proliferation assays
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in cell differentiation of sternocleidomastoid muscle
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
By analyzing muscle microbiopsies cell differentiation assays
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in Blood Flow Index (BFI) of extra-diaphragmatic respiratory muscles
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Measured by near-infrared spectroscopy in combination with injections of the tracer indocyanine green dye (ICG), with optodes transcutaneously positioned on the scalene, sternocleidomastoid and upper rectus abdominis muscles.
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in Tissue Oxygenation Index (TOI) of ex of extra-diaphragmatic respiratory muscles
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Measured by near-infrared spectroscopy with optodes transcutaneously positioned on the scalene, sternocleidomastoid and upper rectus abdominis muscles
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in signal amplitude of diaphragm electromyography
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Diaphragm electromyography will be collected with an esophageal electrode catheter
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Change in signal amplitude of electromyography of extra-diaphragmatic respiratory muscles
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Electromyography of scalene, sternocleidomastoid, parasternal intercostal and rectus abdominis muscles will be collected through surface electromyography electrodes
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Esophageal and gastric pressure
Time Frame: Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days
Using a multifunction nasogastric catheter
Maximal duration of IMT treatment: 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Weaning Failure

Clinical Trials on Procedure: Usual Care (UC)

Subscribe