Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Sapien 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve for Pure Aortic Regurgitation (S3AR)

December 11, 2020 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Sapien 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve for Pure Aortic Regurgitation. The S3AR Study TAVI With Sapien 3 for Pure AR.

The hypothesis is that TAVI using a SAPIEN 3 THV is feasible and safe for the treatment of pure AR.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Up to now, the balloon-expandable valves have been considered contraindicated for patients with pure AR due to the absence of calcium which is considered necessary for the anchoring of the prosthesis. Nonetheless, several cases report have suggested the feasibility of TAVI using the SAPIEN XT THV, in patients with no calcified valves suggesting that an appropriate degree of oversizing might compensate the lack of calcium for the anchoring of these prostheses.

The new generation balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 THV has incorporated changes in the stent frame geometry, leaflets configuration and an external sealing skirt resulting in an increased stability and outstanding control during its implantation, a greater radial force, a reduced rate of paravalvular leaks and a covering of a wider range of annulus dimensions. These characteristics of the SAPIEN 3 THV might translate into a safer use of this device in patients with pure AR and non-calcified valves.

Significant AR occurs in 2.0% of individuals of >75 years, 13.3% of patients referred for intervention, being severe in 5% of these patients. As for aortic stenosis, its prevalence increases with age and the most frequent cause is degenerative although rheumatic and endocarditis are present. Although patients with severe AR have an excess risk of mortality and aortic valve replacement reduces mortality, only 1/3 of patients with significant AR finally undergo intervention. Reasons for no intervention are unknown.

Even if it has been suggested that AR might be underestimated and the prevalence of this disease might be higher than previously reported, and a percent of patients with indication for aortic valve replacement are denied for surgery, pure AR is a small niche of patients for TAVI. In terms of cost-effectiveness, both the development of a dedicated device and the investment in the training of operators in the implantation technique might lack of interest. However, performing TAVI with a device used in the routine practice might be appealing and, importantly, safer. A preliminary case series including 3 patients have suggested the feasibility of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 device for pure AR (Urena M, Himbert D. JACC, 2016 ). In this study we aim to evaluate the feasibility and long-term safety of the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with symptomatic (at least dyspnoea NYHA class III or acute heart failure requiring hospitalisation) and pure AR

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with symptomatic (at least dyspnoea NYHA class III or acute heart failure requiring hospitalisation) and pure AR
  • Contraindication or high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement
  • Echocardiography and computed tomography findings suitable for TAVI using a SAPIEN 3 THV

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for TAVI (active endocarditis, aortic dissection, annuloectasia..)
  • Patients' refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
AR TAVI
The population consists in patients with severe symptomatic AR on native aortic valve who are candidates for surgical aortic valve replacement but who are deemed inoperable by the heart team due to technical issues (i.e., porcelain aorta, previous coronary artery bypass grafting,…), extreme left ventricular dysfunction or comorbidities (liver cirrhosis, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility and 30-day safety of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR
Time Frame: 30 days
1/ Device success at 1 month follow up according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2. 2-Rate of moderate or severe AR at 1-month follow-up
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term safety of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR
Time Frame: 1 year
Long-term safety defined as lack of valve migration and 1 year cardiovascular mortality defined according to the VARC-2 (combined endpoint)
1 year
Long-term performance of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR
Time Frame: 1 year
Rate of moderate or severe AR at 1-year follow-up
1 year
Long-term safety of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR
Time Frame: 1 year
Long-term safety defined as lack of 1-year all cause mortality
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dominique Himbert, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pure Aortic Regurgitation

3
Subscribe