TEND Study:Telemedicine Nurse DBS for Parkinson's Disease

June 7, 2023 updated by: University of Florida

Telemedicine Nurse DBS for Parkinson's Disease: The TEND Study

The central hypothesis is that home health nurses can improve access and provide high quality care when guided by a sophisticated platform that integrates bioinformatics, patient-specific computational modeling, and continuous symptom measurement.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-operative Inclusion Criteria: A good response to levodopa is required in order to exclude patients with Parkinson's plus syndromes, and will be defined as a 30% improvement in parkinsonian motor signs based upon the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination subscore, following the administration of 1.5 times the typical dopaminergic dose during the screening neurological examination. Patients must also have PD for a minimum of 5 years duration.
  • Additional inclusion criteria consist of: 1) Hoehn & Yahr stage II or worse when off; 2) Intractable, disabling motor fluctuations and/or tremor; 3) Age between 30-75 years; 4) Unsatisfactory clinical response to maximal medical management (with trials of both higher and lower doses of antiparkinsonian drugs). 5) A stable/optimal medical regimen of antiparkinsonian drug therapy for at least one month prior to surgery; 6) access to high-speed internet in the home.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant medical disease that would increase the risk of developing pre- or postoperative complications (e.g. significant cardiac or pulmonary disease, uncontrolled hypertension).
  • Evidence of secondary or atypical parkinsonism.
  • MRI scan with significant evidence of brain atrophy or other abnormalities.
  • Dementia as evidenced by impairment in two neuropsychological domains and impaired or borderline neuropsychological function in one additional domain.
  • A major untreated psychiatric disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nurse Telehealth Intervention
Allocated to tele-intervention
Subjects will receive nurse telehealth Mobile Decision Support System (MAP) DBS care
Active Comparator: Standard Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
Allocated to conventional approach
Subjects will receive standard in-person clinic-based DBS care administered without the use of Mobile Decision Support System (MAP) DBS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of participant clinic visits
Time Frame: 6 MONTHS from date of enrollment
The number of in-person clinic visits required for each participant during the 6-month post operative DBS period.
6 MONTHS from date of enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PDQ-39 Scores
Time Frame: 6-months
Difference in PDQ-39 scores from baseline to the 6-month time point. PDQ summary index score 0-very good to 100 bad
6-months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UPDRS scores
Time Frame: 6-months
Difference in UPDRS scores from baseline to 6-month time point. UPDRS scoring scale 0-very good to 100-bad
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Okun, MD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB202002994-N
  • OCR39945 (Other Identifier: UF OnCore)
  • PRO00042966 (Other Identifier: UFIRST)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Nurse Telehealth

Subscribe