- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05084612
Comparison Between a Two Person Insertion With Lateral Rotation Technique of LMA and the Classic Technique
Comparison Between a Two Person Insertion With Lateral Rotation Technique of Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Classic Technique; a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The standard method of insertion described by Dr. Brain is relatively easy, but sometimes it is impossible to insert the LMA with the standard method. However ease and time of airway management may be of special importance in emergent situations. Since its inception the LMA has undergone various modifications in type and material, which have made other methods of insertion possible, quicker and easier than the standard method. Intraoral manipulation can put the operator at risk of finger trauma and infection. However it is not possible to avoid intraoral manipulation when the standard technique or the classic LMA is used.
Therefore, many studies were seeking to find new methods to improve this technique. Hwang et al. first described The 90° rotation technique in adults that involves the following steps: the entire cuff of the LMA is inserted inside the mouth, rotated counter-clockwise through 90° and advanced until the resistance of the hypopharynx is felt . The use of this method is known to increase the success rate of insertion and decrease the incidence of blood staining of the LMA and sore throat compared to standard technique . Ghai et al. showed that rotational technique may be considered as the first technique of choice for classical laryngeal mask airway insertion in children . Lopez-Gil and colleagues reported a decrease in complications with the increase in the skill of the anaesthetist . PARVIZ et al. described a two person technique which performed by the technician who performs mouth opening and jaw thrust and the anesthesiologist who inserts the laryngeal mask. They considered it as a safe and effective method to establish a secure airway in anesthetized patients.. other studies have shown that LMA insertion with partially inflated cuff is easier than deflated cuff .
Current study will combine two methods of LMA insertion including two-persons and lateral rotational techniques and compare them with the standard insertion method regarding the success rate and incidence of complications.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Samar R Amin, lecturer
- Phone Number: 01287793991
- Email: samar.rafik@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Qalubia
-
Banhā, Qalubia, Egypt, 13511
- Recruiting
- Samar Rafik Amin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA physical status grade I-II,
- Age between 20-55 years old
- undergoing minor surgeries under general anaesthesia using LMA
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients at Risk of aspiration,
- Mouth opening ˂ 2.5 cm,
- BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2,
- dental problems,
- recent history of upper airway infection,
- gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and
- limited extension of the neck.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: control group (S)
LMA will be placed using the standard Brain's insertion technique.
|
Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia will be induced with atropine 0.1mg/kg, Fentanyl 2 µg /kg, Propofol 2 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. When neuromuscular blockade will be complete the laryngeal mask will be inserted with using the standard method described by Brain; after lubrication of the posterior aspect of the partially deflated mask, the patient's head will be positioned with head extended at the atlanto-axial joint and flexed at the neck with non-dominant hand. The LMA will be held like a pen and index finger will be placed at the junction of LMA tube and cuff. Index finger will be used to press the LMA against hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until definite resistance felt at the base of the hypopharynx. LMA will then be held with non-dominant hand and index finger will be removed. |
Active Comparator: Rotational group (R)
LMA will be placed using a two Person Insertion with lateral rotation technique.
|
Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia will be induced with atropine 0.1mg/kg, Fentanyl 2 µg /kg, Propofol 2 mg/kg and atracurium 0.5 mg/kg.
When neuromuscular blockade will be complete LMA will be inserted by a two Person Insertion with lateral rotation Technique; after lubrication of the posterior aspect of the partially deflated mask, the assistant will achieve jaw thrust and mouth opening then LMA will be inserted by the anaesthiologist.
LMA will be inserted by holding the mask by index, middle finger and thumb; after insertion of the entire cuff inside the mouth, the LMA will be rotated anticlockwise through 90° (the inner surface of LMA will be directed medially towards the mouth cavity) and advanced through the side of the tongue until resistance felt, then turned back in the hypopharynx.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
the success rate of first attempt insertion of the LMA
Time Frame: from induction of anesthesia till patient connected to the ventilator.
|
confirmed insertion of LMA without need for further attempts.
|
from induction of anesthesia till patient connected to the ventilator.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
LMA insertion time
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
the period from mouth passage of the device to effective ventilation after inflation of the cuff.
|
up to 30 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
The number of insertion attempts
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
If ventilation is still ineffective, re-insertion will be tried up to three times.
After third unsuccessful attempt then one attempt will be made using the alternative approach, if still unsuccessful endotracheal tube will be inserted.
|
up to 30 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
number of manipulations needed during insertion
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
manipulations like jaw thrust, chin lift, and extension and flexion of the neck
|
up to 30 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
The incidence of complications following insertion of LMA
Time Frame: up to 1 day postoperative
|
including; laryngospasm, hypoxaemia (SpO2 < 90%) and trauma (assessed by blood stained LMA on removal)
|
up to 1 day postoperative
|
Heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: first 15 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
monitoring of stress response during the maneuver
|
first 15 minutes post-induction of anesthesia
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- RC4-4-2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Airway Complication of Anesthesia
-
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación...UnknownAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationSpain
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway Aspiration | Complication of Anesthesia | Esophagus Injury | Supraglottic Airway Efficiency | Endoscopic Ergonomics | ERCP Airway ManagementTurkey
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruitingAnesthesia | Airway Complication of AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedAirway Complication of Anesthesia | Airway AspirationTurkey
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedAirway Management | Anesthesia | Airway Complication of Anesthesia | Intubation;Difficult | LaryngoscopyGermany
-
Baylor College of MedicineRecruiting
-
University of Turin, ItalyNot yet recruitingAirway Complication of AnesthesiaUnited States, India, Italy, France, Ireland
-
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research...RecruitingAirway Complication of AnesthesiaTurkey
-
Aga Khan UniversityRecruiting
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...CompletedAirway Complication of AnesthesiaCanada
Clinical Trials on standard LMA insertion
-
Aga Khan UniversityCompletedTraining Group, SensitivityPakistan
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedOropharyngeal InjuryKorea, Republic of
-
Adiyaman University Research HospitalCompletedRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric Content
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedLower Extremity Surgery | Minor Urologic SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompletedEndotracheal IntubationFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompletedPharyngolaryngeal Postoperative PainFrance
-
Yonsei UniversityCompleted
-
Yonsei UniversityCompleted
-
Legacy Health SystemDevers Eye Institute; Lions Eye Bank of Oregon Vision Research Laboratory; Fischer...UnknownFuchs' Corneal Endothelial DystrophyUnited States
-
Albany Medical CollegeONY; LMA North America, Inc.CompletedRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornUnited States