Effectiveness of Epidermal Growth Factor-containing Ointment on the Solar Lentigines

January 7, 2021 updated by: Bo Young Chung, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Epidermal Growth Factor-containing Ointment on the Treatment of Solar Lentigines as Adjuvant Therapy

Subjects were randomly assigned to groups for treatment with either an EGF-containing ointment (the study group) or the vehicle alone (petrolatum; the control group). The EGF ointment included recombinant human EGF (1 μg/g). Random numbers used for assignment to groups were provided by the randomization function of SAS.

The subjects received one session of laser treatment with a Q-switched (QS) 532-nm Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser of their solar lentigines after enrollment. . The end point of laser treatment for lentigines was immediate whitening. The subjects then applied the EGF ointment or vehicle twice daily (morning and evening) to the lesion for 4 weeks after laser treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of solar lentigines that occurred after adulthood
  • age of 20 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled systemic or chronic disease
  • hypersensitivity to the ingredients of the ointment
  • current use of skin whitening agents
  • a history of other laser treatments within the past 6 months
  • pregnancy
  • lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: epidermal growth factor (EGF) containing ointment group

The subjects received one session of laser treatment with a Q-swithced (QS) 532-nm Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser after enrollment.

The procedure parameters were as follows: 5-10-ns pulse duration, 3.5-mm spot size, 0.9-1.1-J/cm2 fluence, and 2-Hz frequency.

The end point of laser treatment for lentigines was immediate whitening. The subjects then applied the epidermal growth factor (EGF) ointment twice daily (morning and evening) to the lesion for 4 weeks after laser treatment.

The subjects applied the epidermal growth factor (EGF) ointment twice daily (morning and evening) to the lesion for 4 weeks after laser treatment.
Other Names:
  • Easyef Saesal ointment, Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea

The subjects received one session of laser treatment with a Q-swithced (QS) 532-nm Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser of their solar lentigines after enrollment.

The procedure parameters were as follows: 5-10-ns pulse duration, 3.5-mm spot size, 0.9-1.1-J/cm2 fluence, and 2-Hz frequency.

The end point of laser treatment for lentigines was immediate whitening.

Other Names:
  • Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet laser (Iris, Bluecore Company Co., Ltd., Busan, Korea)
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle ointment group

The subjects received one session of laser treatment with a Q-swithced (QS) 532-nm Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser of their solar lentigines after enrollment.

The procedure parameters were as follows: 5-10-ns pulse duration, 3.5-mm spot size, 0.9-1.1-J/cm2 fluence, and 2-Hz frequency.

The end point of laser treatment for lentigines was immediate whitening. The subjects then applied the vehicle ointment twice daily (morning and evening) to the lesion for 4 weeks after laser treatment.

The subjects received one session of laser treatment with a Q-swithced (QS) 532-nm Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser of their solar lentigines after enrollment.

The procedure parameters were as follows: 5-10-ns pulse duration, 3.5-mm spot size, 0.9-1.1-J/cm2 fluence, and 2-Hz frequency.

The end point of laser treatment for lentigines was immediate whitening.

Other Names:
  • Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet laser (Iris, Bluecore Company Co., Ltd., Busan, Korea)
To compare the effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) ointment, the control subjects applied the vehicle ointment twice daily (morning and evening) to the lesion for 4 weeks after laser treatment.
Other Names:
  • containing petrolatum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pigmentation by physician's assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline pigmentation at 4 weeks

The pigment clearance was assessed using a 5-grade percentage improvement scale

grade 1, <0% [worse]; grade 2, 0%-25% improvement; grade 3, 26%-50% improvement; grade 4, 51%-75% improvement; grade 5, 76%-100% improvement

-> higher score means better outcomes

Change from baseline pigmentation at 4 weeks
Change of pigmentation by physician's assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline pigmentation at 8 weeks

The pigment clearance was assessed using a 5-grade percentage improvement scale

grade 1, <0% [worse]; grade 2, 0%-25% improvement; grade 3, 26%-50% improvement; grade 4, 51%-75% improvement; grade 5, 76%-100% improvement

-> higher score means better outcomes

Change from baseline pigmentation at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Erythema index
Time Frame: baseline

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine erythema.

baseline
Erythema index
Time Frame: 2 weeks

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine erythema.

2 weeks
Erythema index
Time Frame: 4 weeks

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine erythema.

4 weeks
Erythema index
Time Frame: 8 weeks

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine erythema.

8 weeks
Melanin index
Time Frame: baseline

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine pigmentation.

baseline
Melanin index
Time Frame: 2 weeks

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine pigmentation.

2 weeks
Melanin index
Time Frame: 4 weeks

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine pigmentation.

4 weeks
Melanin index
Time Frame: 8 weeks

A spectrophotometer was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine pigmentation.

8 weeks
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: baseline

A VapoMeter®(Delfin Technologies Ltd., Kuopio, Finland) was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine transepidermal water loss

baseline
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: 2 weeks

A VapoMeter®(Delfin Technologies Ltd., Kuopio, Finland) was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine transepidermal water loss

2 weeks
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: 4 weeks

A VapoMeter®(Delfin Technologies Ltd., Kuopio, Finland) was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine transepidermal water loss

4 weeks
Transepidermal water loss
Time Frame: 8 weeks

A VapoMeter®(Delfin Technologies Ltd., Kuopio, Finland) was used to assess the lesion in a room at constant temperature (20-24 °C) and humidity (28%-38%).

Skin measurements were performed to determine transepidermal water loss

8 weeks
Patient's subjective satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 weeks

The patient's subjective satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire according to the following: 1, worse; 2, no change; 3, mild improvement; 4, moderate improvement; or 5, significant improvement.

higher score means better outcome

4 weeks
Patient's subjective satisfaction
Time Frame: 8 weeks

The patient's subjective satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire according to the following: 1, worse; 2, no change; 3, mild improvement; 4, moderate improvement; or 5, significant improvement.

higher score means better outcome

8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bo Young Chung, M.D., PhD, Department of Dermatology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperpigmentation

Clinical Trials on epidermal growth factor (EGF)-containing ointment

3
Subscribe