Topical Tranexamic Acid Versus Topical Vitamin C With Microneedling in Periorbital Hyperpigmentation; Comparative Study

January 5, 2021 updated by: Doaa Mohsen, Kasr El Aini Hospital
Both vitamin C 20% and tranexamic acid 5mg/ml combined with microneedling were used for treatment of periorbital hyperpigmentation in a comparative pattern and both resulted in significant improvement of periorbital hyperpigmentation by dermoscopic and clinical evaluation with no statistically significant difference between them in addition to improvement of patients' visual analogue score (VAS) and dermatology life quality index (DLQI).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sixty patients with periorbital hyperpigmentation were enrolled, patients were divided into 2 groups; 30 each. clinical grading according to sheth et al.,2014 , dermoscopic evaluation, visual analogue score (VAS) and DLQI were done at week 0. Group A one side was treated with vit.c 20% + microneedling, other side saline+ microneedling (placebo). group B one side was treated with tranexamic acid 5mg/ml + microneedling, other side saline+ microneedling (placebo). A total of 4 sessions were done 2 weeks apart and follow up was one month after the last session (week 10) at which patient was evaluated using above mentioned parameters in addition to evaluation by 2 blinded investigators. At week 10 there was significant improvement of clinical grading and as evaluated by blinded investigators, VAS, DLQI, significant dermoscopic improvement in both vascular and pigmentary components of dark halos in sides treated with vit c and tranexamic acid compared to placebo but there was no statistically significant difference between both groups. The study concluded that tranexamic acid is a new safe effective modality in treatment of periorbital hyperpigmentation with results comparable to vitamin C.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Doaa Mohsen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • both genders.
  • age ≥ 18 years.
  • pigmentary, vascular and mixed types of dark halos

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy and lactation
  • patients who received treatment in the past 3 months
  • patients with active dermatologic diseases or history of atopic dermatitis.
  • history of allergy to tranexamic acid or vitamin c
  • history of keloid or hypertrophic scars
  • pure structural type of dark halos, pigmentary demarcation lines

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group A
one eye was treated with vitamin c 20% + microneedling a session was done every 2 weeks a total of 4 sessions (other eye was placebo treated with saline + microneedling).
one eye was treated with vitamin c 20% + microneedling a session was done every 2 weeks a total of 4 sessions (other eye was placebo treated with saline + microneedling).
Other Names:
  • vitamin c 20% global cosmetic solutions
Experimental: group B
one eye was treated with tranexamic acid 5 mg/ml + microneedling a session was done every 2 weeks a total of 4 sessions (other eye was placebo treated with saline + microneedling).
one eye was treated with tranexamin acid 5 mg/ml + microneedling a session was done every 2 weeks a total of 4 sessions (other eye was placebo treated with saline + microneedling)
Other Names:
  • kapron 500mg/ 5ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluation of effectiveness of tranexamic acid in periorbital hyperpigmentation
Time Frame: 10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
this is evaluated using dermoscopy (giving a score from 0 to 4, 0 = no improvement, 1=1-25% improvement, 2 =26- 50% improvement, 3=51-75% improvement, 4=>75% improvement)
10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
evaluation of effectiveness of tranexamic acid in periorbital hyperpigmentation
Time Frame: 10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
clinical improvement by two blinded investigators (giving a score from 0 to 4, 0 = no improvement, 1=1-25% improvement, 2 =26- 50% improvement, 3=51-75% improvement, 4=>75% improvement)
10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
evaluation of effectiveness of tranexamic acid in periorbital hyperpigmentation
Time Frame: 10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
clinical improvement by physician (grade from 0 to 4 according to sheth et al.,2014 where 0 no halos and 4 most severe)
10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
evaluation of effectiveness of tranexamic acid in periorbital hyperpigmentation
Time Frame: 10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
dermatology life quality index (score from 0 to 30 the higher the worst)
10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
evaluation of effectiveness of tranexamic acid in periorbital hyperpigmentation
Time Frame: 10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)
patient visual analogue score (score from 0 to 10 the higher the worst)
10 weeks (patients are assissed 1 month after the last session)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

im looking forward sharing the data but i have no plan yet

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periorbital Hyperpigmentation

Clinical Trials on vitamin c 20%

Subscribe