Vitamin C Depigmenattion Versus Conventional Technique

October 23, 2018 updated by: nermin mohammed ahmed yussif, Cairo University

Minimally Invasive Non-surgical Vitamin C Injection Versus the Conventional Surgical Depigmentation in Treatment of Gingival Hyperpigmentation of the Anterior Esthetic Zone: Prospective Study

Although physiologic gingival hyperpigmentation is not a pathologic condition, it is considered one of the main esthetic problems in dentistry. It was found that the attached gingiva is the most frequently pigmented intraoral tissues followed by the papillary gingiva and the alveolar mucosa

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In addition to all of the previously mentioned actions of vitamin C, it was found to be involved in depigmentation due to several factors that not only depend on its direct effect on melanin and melanocytes but also due to the overall effect on the applied tissues. Melanin is one of the main reservoir for ROS, copper and calcium in the tissue cells . Once vitamin C is introduced to the target tissue, it binds efficiently to melanin due to the ROS, calcium and copper content which causes intracellular deficiency of these items and the inability of the cells to produce melanin. Calcium deficiency causes failure of melanocytes to perform cellular adhesion to keratinocytes as calcium is essential to form cadherins . Adhesion to keratinocytes is important stimulator to melanocytes in order to produce melanin, format dendrites and transfer the produced melanin to neighboring cells . Shortage of the intercellular copper limits the formation of tyrosin, tyrosinase enzyme and peroxidase enzyme which in turn stops the melanin production .

Therefore, the aim of the present study is to compare the clinical efficiency of the non-surgical intraepidermal injection of vitamin C in comparison to the gold standard surgical technique (scalpel technique) for gingival depigmentation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18-50 y
  • medically free;
  • physiologic gingival hyperpigmentation related to esthetic region were selected.

Exclusion Criteria:

All the reasons that could provoke an inflammatory reaction were excluded such as:

  • systemic diseases (especially auto-immune diseases and chemotherapy uptake);
  • pregnant and lactating mothers;
  • usage of chlorhexidine or povidone iodine;
  • Local causes (smoking and periodontitis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: non-surgical vitamin c depigmentation
locally injected vitamin c is used to depigment the hyperpigmented gingival tissues
locally injected vitamin c depigementation
Active Comparator: surgical depigmentation
the conventional scalpel surgical technique is used to depigment the hyperpigmented gingival tissues
locally injected vitamin c depigementation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
gingival color change
Time Frame: 6 months
the degree of gingival color is determined by 2 different color indices
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: nermin yussif, MSA University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melanin Hyperpigmentation

Clinical Trials on vitamin c depigementation

3
Subscribe