- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04740931
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion (COMINO)
July 10, 2024 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion
This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of faricimab administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection at 4-week intervals until Week 24, followed by a double-masked period of study without active control to evaluate faricimab administered according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen in patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
729
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Caba, Argentina, C1017AAO
- Fundacion Zambrano
-
Capital Federal, Argentina, C1015ABO
- Centro Oftalmologico Dr. Charles S.A.
-
Capital Federal, Argentina, C1120AAN
- Oftalmos
-
Capital Federal, Argentina, C1199ABC
- Hospital Italiano; Ophtalmology
-
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1061AAE
- Buenos Aires Mácula
-
Mendoza, Argentina, M5500GGK
- Oftar
-
Rosario, Argentina, S2000DLA
- Grupo Laser Vision
-
Rosario, Argentina, S2000ANJ
- Centro Oftalmólogos Especialistas
-
San Nicolás, Argentina, C1015ABO
- Organizacion Medica de Investigacion
-
-
-
-
New South Wales
-
Albury, New South Wales, Australia, 2640
- Eyeclinic Albury Wodonga
-
Strathfield, New South Wales, Australia, 2135
- Strathfield Retina Clinic
-
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000
- Save Sight Institute
-
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000
- Sydney Retina Clinic and Day Surgery
-
-
Victoria
-
East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3002
- Centre for Eye Research Australia
-
Rowville, Victoria, Australia, 3178
- Retina Specialists Victoria
-
-
Western Australia
-
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
- The Lions Eye Institute
-
-
-
-
-
Graz, Austria, 8036
- LKH-Univ.Klinikum Graz; Universitäts-Augenklinik
-
Wien, Austria, 1090
- Medizinische Universität Wien; Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde und Optometrie
-
-
-
-
GO
-
Aparecida de Goiania, GO, Brazil, 74980-010
- Hospital de Olhos de Aparecida - HOA
-
-
RS
-
Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90035-903
- Hospital das Clinicas - UFRGS
-
-
SC
-
Blumenau, SC, Brazil, 89052-504
- Botelho Hospital da Visao
-
-
SP
-
Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023-062
- Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo - UNIFESP*X; Oftalmologia
-
Sorocaba, SP, Brazil, 18031-060
- Hosp de Olhos de Sorocaba
-
-
-
-
-
Beijing, China, 100730
- Beijing Hospital of Ministry of Health
-
Changchun, China, 130041
- The Second Hospital of Jilin University
-
Chengdu, China, 610041
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University
-
Guangzhou City, China, 510060
- Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
-
Hangzhou City, China, 310009
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
Harbin, China, 150001
- The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
-
Shanghai, China, 200080
- Shanghai First People's Hospital
-
Shanghai, China, 200072
- Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital
-
Shenyang City, China, 110034
- He Eye Specialist Shenyang Hospital
-
Shenzhen City, China, 518053
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital; Local Ethic Committee
-
Tianjin City, China, 300050
- Tianjin Eye Hospital
-
Tianjin City, China, 300070
- Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital
-
Wenzhou City, China, 325027
- Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University
-
Wuhan, China, 430060
- Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
-
Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Provincial Eye Hosptial
-
-
-
-
-
Prague, Czechia
- AXON Clinical
-
Prague, Czechia, 128 08
- General Teaching Hospital Prague; Ophthalmology clinic
-
-
-
-
-
Creteil, France, 94010
- Chi De Creteil; Ophtalmologie
-
Paris, France, 75010
- Hopital Lariboisiere; Ophtalmologie
-
Paris, France, 75015
- Centre Ophtalmologique; Imagerie et laser
-
St Cyr Sur Loire, France, 37540
- Centres Ophtalmologique St Exupéry; Ophtalmologie
-
-
-
-
-
Düsseldorf-Oberkassel, Germany, 40549
- Internationale Innovative Ophthalmochirurgie GbR; c/o Makula-Netzhaut-Zentrum Breyer Kaymak Klabe
-
Freiburg, Germany, 79106
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Augenheilkunde
-
Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67063
- Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH; Augenklinik
-
-
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Queen Mary Hospital; Department of Ophthalmology
-
Mongkok, Hong Kong
- Hong Kong Eye Hospital; CUHK Eye Centre
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1133
- Budapest Retina Associates Kft.
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1106
- Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Hospital
-
Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
- Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont; Szemeszeti Klinika
-
Szeged, Hungary, 6720
- Szegedi Tudományegyetem ÁOK; Department of Ophtalmology
-
Zalaegerszeg, Hungary, 8900
- Zala Megyei Kórház; SZEMESZET
-
-
-
-
-
Haifa, Israel, 3109601
- Rambam Medical Center; Opthalmology
-
Jerusalem, Israel, 9112001
- Hadassah MC; Ophtalmology
-
Petach Tikva, Israel, 4941492
- Rabin MC; Ophtalmology
-
Rehovot, Israel, 7660101
- Kaplan Medical Center; Ophtalmology
-
Tel Aviv, Israel, 6423906
- Tel Aviv Sourasky MC; Ophtalmology
-
-
-
-
Lazio
-
Roma, Lazio, Italy, 00198
- Fondazione G.B. Bietti Per Lo Studio E La Ricerca in Oftalmologia-Presidio Ospedaliero Britannico
-
-
Lombardia
-
Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20132
- Irccs Ospedale San Raffaele;U.O. Oculistica
-
-
-
-
-
Aichi, Japan, 480-1195
- Aichi Medical University Hospital
-
Aichi, Japan, 460-0008
- Sugita Eye Hospital
-
Aichi, Japan, 466-8560
- Nagoya University Hospital
-
Aichi, Japan, 467-8602
- Nagoya City University Hospital
-
Chiba, Japan, 285-8741
- Toho University Sakura Medical Center
-
Fukuoka, Japan, 830-0011
- Kurume University Hospital
-
Fukuoka, Japan, 812-0011
- Hayashi Eye Hospital
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 078-8510
- Asahikawa Medical University Hospital
-
Hyogo, Japan, 663-8501
- Hyogo Medical University Hospital
-
Hyogo, Japan, 660-8550
- Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center (Hyogo AGMC)
-
Ibaraki, Japan, 310-0845
- Kozawa Eye Hospital And Diabetes Center
-
Kagawa, Japan, 761-0793
- Kagawa University Hospital
-
Kagoshima, Japan, 890-8520
- Kagoshima University Hospital
-
Mie, Japan, 514-8507
- Mie University Hospital
-
Miyagi, Japan, 960-1295
- Fukushima Medical University Hospital
-
Nagano, Japan, 390-8621
- Shinshu University Hospital
-
Osaka, Japan, 545-8586
- Osaka Metropolitan university Hospital
-
Osaka, Japan, 570-8507
- Kansai Medical University Medical Center
-
Tokyo, Japan, 162-8666
- Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital
-
Tokyo, Japan, 193-0998
- Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center
-
-
-
-
-
Busan, Korea, Republic of, 602-739
- Pusan National University Hospital
-
Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 42415
- Yeungnam University Medical Center
-
Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
- Asan Medical Center
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02447
- Kyung Hee University Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
- Samsung Medical Center
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07301
- Kim's Eye Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Bielsko-Biala, Poland, 43-309
- Szpital sw. Lukasza
-
Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-631
- OFTALMIKA Sp. z o.o
-
Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-870
- Specjalistyczny O?rodek Okulistyczny Oculomedica
-
Bytom, Poland, 41-902
- Szpital Specjalistyczny nr 1; Oddzial Okulistyki
-
Gda?sk, Poland, 80-402
- Dobry Wzrok Sp Z O O
-
Gda?sk, Poland, 80-809
- Optimum Profesorskie Centrum Okulistyki
-
Gliwice, Poland, 44-100
- Poradnia Okulistyczna i Salon Optyczny w Gliwicach- PRYZMAT
-
Katowice, Poland, 40-594
- Gabinet Okulistyczny Prof Edward Wylegala
-
Krakow, Poland, 31-501
- SP ZOZ Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie Oddzia? Kliniczny Okulistyki i Onkologii Okulistycznej
-
Kraków, Poland, 31-070
- Centrum Medyczne Dietla 19 Sp. z o.o.
-
Krosno, Poland, 38-400
- MT Medic Krosno
-
Na??czów, Poland, 24-140
- O?rodek Chirurgii Oka Prof. Zagórskiego Na??czów
-
Piaseczno, Poland, 05-500
- Centrum Medyczne Pulawska Sp. z o.o.
-
Rybnik, Poland, 44-203
- Lens Clinic
-
Tarnowskie Góry, Poland, 42-600
- Caminomed
-
Warszawa, Poland, 00-189
- Centrum Zdrowia MDM
-
Wroclaw, Poland, 53-334
- SPEKTRUM Osrodek Okulistyki Klinicznej
-
-
-
-
-
Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
- Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra EPE - Serviço Oftalmologia; Serviço Oftalmologia
-
Coimbra, Portugal, 3030-163
- Espaco Medico Coimbra
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1649-035
- Hospital de Santa Maria; Servico de Oftalmologia
-
-
-
-
Baskortostan
-
UFA, Baskortostan, Russian Federation, 450059
- Clinic Optimed
-
-
Marij EL
-
Cheboksary, Marij EL, Russian Federation, 428000
- Intersec Research and Technology Complex ?Eye Microsurgery? n.a. S.N. Fyodorov; Cheboksary Branch
-
-
Moskovskaja Oblast
-
Moscow, Moskovskaja Oblast, Russian Federation, 119435
- FSBI ?Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases? of Russian Academy of medical Sciences
-
-
Sankt Petersburg
-
Sankt-peterburg, Sankt Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
- 1 Saint-Petersburg St. Med. University named after academician I.P.Pavlov; Chair of ophathalmology
-
St.Petersburg, Sankt Petersburg, Russian Federation, 124044
- Medical Military Academy n.a S.M.Kirov
-
-
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 168751
- Singapore Eye Research Institute
-
Singapore, Singapore, 308433
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital; Ophthalmology Department
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08021
- Centro de Oftalmologia Barraquer; Servicio Oftalmologia
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08028
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona; Consultas Externas Oftalmologia
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08041
- Hospital de Santa Creu I Sant Pau; Servicio de Oftalmologia
-
Valladolid, Spain, 47012
- Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega; Servicio de Oftalmologia
-
-
Barcelona
-
Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
- Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
-
San Cugat Del Valles, Barcelona, Spain, 08195
- Hospital General De Catalunya
-
-
Madrid
-
Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 28222
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
-
-
Navarra
-
Pamplona, Navarra, Spain, 31008
- Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra; Servicio de oftalmologia
-
-
-
-
-
Changhua, Taiwan, 500
- Changhua Christian Hospital; Department of Ophthalmology
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Ophthalmology
-
Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
- Chang Gung Medical Foundation - Linkou; Ophthalmology
-
-
-
-
-
Belfast, United Kingdom, BT12 6BA
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL
-
Birmingham, United Kingdom, B18 7QH
- Birmingham Midland Eye Centre
-
Bradford, United Kingdom, BD9 6RJ
- Opthalmology Research Office
-
Bristol, United Kingdom, BS1 2LX
- Bristol Eye Hospital;Retinal Treatment and Research Unit
-
Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF14 4XW
- University Hospital of wales
-
Leeds, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
- St James University Hospital
-
Liverpool, United Kingdom, L7 8YE
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital; St Paul's Clinical Eye Research Centre
-
London, United Kingdom, NW10 7NS
- Central Middlesex Hospital
-
Maidstone, United Kingdom, ME16 9QQ
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
-
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
- Royal Victoria Infirmary
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85206
- Barnet Dulaney Perkins Eye Center
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85014
- Retinal Research Institute, LLC
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85704
- Retina Associates Southwest PC
-
-
California
-
Campbell, California, United States, 95008
- Retinal Diagnostic Center
-
Encino, California, United States, 91436
- The Retina Partners
-
Fullerton, California, United States, 92835-3424
- Retina Consultants of Orange County
-
Mountain View, California, United States, 94040
- Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates
-
Oakland, California, United States, 94609
- East Bay Retina Consultants
-
Pasadena, California, United States, 91107
- California Eye Specialists Medical Group Inc.
-
Poway, California, United States, 92064
- Retina Consultants, San Diego
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94109
- West Coast Retina Medical Group
-
-
Colorado
-
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80909
- Retina Consultants of Southern Colorado PC
-
Lakewood, Colorado, United States, 80228
- Colorado Retina Associates, PC
-
-
Connecticut
-
Waterford, Connecticut, United States, 06385
- Retina Group of New England
-
-
Florida
-
Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States, 33064
- Rand Eye
-
Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States, 33064
- Advanced Research
-
Melbourne, Florida, United States, 32901
- Florida Eye Associates
-
Plantation, Florida, United States, 33324
- Fort Lauderdale Eye Institute
-
Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33711
- Retina Vitreous Assoc of FL
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33609
- Retina Associates of Florida, LLC
-
-
Georgia
-
Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30909
- Southeast Retina Center
-
Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060-1137
- Georgia Retina PC
-
-
Hawaii
-
'Aiea, Hawaii, United States, 96701
- Retina Consultants Of Hawaii
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern Medical Group/Northwestern University
-
Elmhurst, Illinois, United States, 60126
- Retina Associated Ltd
-
Oak Forest, Illinois, United States, 60452
- University Retina and Macula Associates, PC
-
Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62704
- Prairie Retina Center
-
-
Kansas
-
Lenexa, Kansas, United States, 66215
- Retina Associates
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Med; Wilmer Eye Inst
-
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
- Retina Group of Washington
-
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States, 21740
- Cumberland Valley Retina PC
-
-
Michigan
-
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
- Assoc Retinal Consultants PC
-
-
Minnesota
-
Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55435
- VitreoRetinal Surgery, PLLC.; DBA Retina Consultants of Minnesota
-
-
Missouri
-
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63017
- Midwest Vision Research Foundation
-
-
Nevada
-
Reno, Nevada, United States, 89502
- Sierra Eye Associates
-
-
New York
-
Hauppauge, New York, United States, 11788
- Long Is. Vitreoretinal Consult
-
Liverpool, New York, United States, 13088
- Retina Vit Surgeons/Central NY
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14620
- Retina Assoc of Western NY
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242
- Cincinnati Eye Institute
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97221
- Retina Northwest
-
Springfield, Oregon, United States, 97477
- Cascade Medical Research Institute LLC
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- Mid Atlantic Retina - Wills Eye Hospital
-
-
South Carolina
-
Ladson, South Carolina, United States, 29456
- Charleston Neuroscience Institute
-
West Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29169
- Palmetto Retina Center
-
-
South Dakota
-
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57701
- Black Hills Eye Institute
-
-
Tennessee
-
Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
- Charles Retina Institute
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
- Tennessee Retina PC
-
-
Texas
-
Abilene, Texas, United States, 79606
- Retina Res Institute of Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78750
- Austin Clinical Research LLC
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78705-1169
- Austin Retina Associates
-
Bellaire, Texas, United States, 77401-3510
- Retina & Vitreous of Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
- Texas Retina Associates
-
The Woodlands, Texas, United States, 77384-4167
- Retina Consultants of Texas
-
Willow Park, Texas, United States, 76087
- Strategic Clinical Research Group, LLC
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107
- Retina Associates of Utah, PLLC
-
-
Virginia
-
Lynchburg, Virginia, United States, 24502
- Piedmont Eye Center
-
-
West Virginia
-
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26506
- West Virginia University Eye Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Foveal center-involved macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO), diagnosed no longer than 4 months prior to the screening visit
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 73 to 19 letters, inclusive (20/40 to 20/400 approximate Snellen equivalent)
- Sufficiently clear ocular media and adequate pupillary dilatation to allow acquisition of good quality retinal images to confirm diagnosis
- For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent or use contraception, and agreement to refrain from donating eggs during the treatment period and for 3 months after the final dose of study treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any major illness or major surgical procedure within 1 month before screening
- Uncontrolled blood pressure
- Stroke (cerebral vascular accident) or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Day 1
- Pregnant or breastfeeding, or intending to become pregnant during the study
Ocular Exclusion Criteria for Study Eye:
- History of previous episodes of macular edema due to RVO or persistent macular edema due to RVO diagnosed more than 4 months before screening
- Any current ocular condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, is currently causing or could be expected to contribute to irreversible vision loss due to a cause other than macular edema due to RVO in the study eye (e.g., ischemic maculopathy, Irvine-Gass syndrome, foveal atrophy, foveal fibrosis, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, or other non-retinal conditions)
- Macular laser (focal/grid) in the study eye at any time prior to Day 1
- Panretinal photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months prior to Day 1 or anticipated within 3 months of study start on Day 1
- Any prior or current treatment for macular edema; macular neovascularization, including diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD); and vitreomacular-interface abnormalities, including, but not restricted to, IVT treatment with anti-VEGF, steroids, tissue plasminogen activator, ocriplasmin, C3F8, air or periocular injection
- Any prior intervention with verteporfin photodynamic therapy, diode laser, transpupillary thermotherapy, or vitreo-retinal surgery including sheathotomy
- Any prior steroid implant use including dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) and fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (Iluvien)
Ocular Exclusion Criteria for Both Eyes:
- Prior IVT administration of faricimab in either eye
- History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye
- Active periocular, ocular or intraocular inflammation or infection (including suspected) in either eye on Day 1
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm A: Faricimab Q4W (Part 1), Faricimab PTI (Part 2)
In Part 1 (Day 1 through Week 24), participants randomly assigned to Arm A will receive faricimab 6 milligrams (mg) by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Day 1 through Week 20 (a total of 6 injections).
In Part 2 (from Week 24 to Week 72), participants will receive faricimab 6 mg by IVT injection according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen.
To preserve masking for Part 2, a sham procedure will be administered during study visits at which no faricimab treatment is administered (according to the PTI dosing regimen).
|
Faricimab will be administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection as specified in each treatment arm.
Other Names:
The sham is a procedure that mimics an IVT injection, but involves the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) being pressed against the anesthetized eye.
It will be administered to participants in both treatments arms at applicable visits to maintain masking.
|
|
Active Comparator: Arm B: Aflibercept Q4W (Part 1), Faricimab PTI (Part 2)
In Part 1 (Day 1 through Week 24), participants randomly assigned to Arm B will receive aflibercept 2 milligrams (mg) by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Day 1 through Week 20 (a total of 6 injections).
In Part 2 (from Week 24 to Week 72), participants will receive faricimab 6 mg by IVT injection according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen.
To preserve masking for Part 2, a sham procedure will be administered during study visits at which no faricimab treatment is administered (according to the PTI dosing regimen).
|
Faricimab will be administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection as specified in each treatment arm.
Other Names:
Aflibercept 2 mg will be administered by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Day 1 through Week 20 (a total of 6 injections).
Other Names:
The sham is a procedure that mimics an IVT injection, but involves the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) being pressed against the anesthetized eye.
It will be administered to participants in both treatments arms at applicable visits to maintain masking.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 24
Time Frame: From Baseline through Week 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)] as fixed effects.
An unstructured covariance structure was used.
Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random.
Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
From Baseline through Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With ≤38 Letters in BCVA (20/200 or Worse Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (>38 and ≤38 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world).
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
|
The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and vision-related quality of life.
The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and 1 item on general health.
The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related functioning.
For the ANCOVA analysis, the model uses the non-missing change from baseline in BCVA at Weeks 24 as the response variables adjusted for the treatment group, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score (continuous), baseline BCVA score (≥55 and ≤54 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and the rest of the world).
Observed NEI VFQ-25 assessments were used regardless of the occurrence of intercurrent events.
Missing data were not imputed.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline and Week 24
|
|
Part 2: Number of Study Drug Injections Received in the Study Eye From Week 24 Through Week 72
Time Frame: From Week 24 to Week 72
|
From Week 24 to Week 72
|
|
|
Part 1: Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)] as fixed effects.
An unstructured covariance structure was used.
Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random.
Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Week 24
Time Frame: From Baseline through Week 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
From Baseline through Week 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining >0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥84 Letters in BCVA (20/20 Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥69 Letters in BCVA (20/40 or Better Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the Bruch's membrane (BM) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), as assessed by the central reading center.
The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline CST (continuous), and randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)] as fixed effects.
An unstructured covariance structure was used.
Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random.
Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Macular Edema in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of <325 microns in the study eye.
Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Intraretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Subretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)] as fixed effects.
An unstructured covariance structure was used.
Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random.
Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining >0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥84 Letters in BCVA (20/20 Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥69 Letters in BCVA (20/40 or Better Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With ≤38 Letters in BCVA (20/200 or Worse Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (>38 and ≤38 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world).
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in NEI VFQ-25 Questionnaire Composite Score at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 72
|
The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and vision-related quality of life.
The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and 1 item on general health.
The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related functioning.
For the MMRM analysis, the model adjusted for the treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score continuous), baseline BCVA score (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and the rest of the world).
Observed NEI VFQ-25 assessments were used regardless of the occurrence of intercurrent events.
Missing data were implicitly imputed.
Invalid BCVA values were excluded.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), as assessed by the central reading center.
The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline CST (continuous), and randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)] as fixed effects.
An unstructured covariance structure was used.
Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random.
Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Macular Edema in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of <325 microns in the study eye.
Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Intraretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Subretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Part 2: Change From Week 24 in BCVA in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)] as fixed effects.
An unstructured covariance structure was used.
Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random.
Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of >0 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72
Time Frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters.
The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors [baseline BCVA (≤34, 35-54, and ≥55 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)].
All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy).
Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward.
95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.
|
Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Participants on Different Treatment Intervals at Week 68
Time Frame: Week 68
|
In Part 2 of the study, participants in both the faricimab Q4W and aflibercept Q4W arms in Part 1 received 6 mg faricimab intravitreal injections administered according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen in intervals between Q4W and Q16W.
At faricimab dosing visits, treatment intervals were maintained or adjusted (i.e., increased by 4 weeks or decreased by 4, 8, or 12 weeks), based on central subfield thickness (CST) and BCVA values.
|
Week 68
|
|
Incidence and Severity of Ocular Adverse Events in the Study Eye, With Severity Determined According to Adverse Event Severity Grading Scale
Time Frame: Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72
|
This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs that occurred in the study eye.
Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants.
All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE.
Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI).
|
Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72
|
|
Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events in the Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72
|
This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs that occurred in the fellow eye.
Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants.
All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE.
Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI).
|
Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72
|
|
Incidence of Non-Ocular Adverse Events
Time Frame: Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72
|
This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes non-ocular (systemic) AEs.
Investigators sought information on adverse events (AEs) at each contact with the participants.
All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE.
The non-ocular AE of special interest was: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.
|
Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72
|
|
Plasma Concentration of Faricimab Over Time
Time Frame: Predose at Day 1 (Baseline), Weeks 4, 24, 28, 52, and 72
|
Predose at Day 1 (Baseline), Weeks 4, 24, 28, 52, and 72
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Faricimab at Baseline and Post-Baseline During the Study
Time Frame: Predose at Day 1 (Baseline), Weeks 4, 24, 28, 52, and 72
|
Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against fariciamb were detected in plasma using a validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA-positive samples includes post-baseline evaluable participants with at least one treatment-induced (defined as having an ADA-negative sample or missing sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample) or treatment-boosted (defined as having an ADA-positive sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample with a titer that is equal to or greater than 4-fold baseline titer) ADA-positive sample during the study treatment period.
Treatment-unaffected ADA-positive is a post-baseline sample with a titer that is lower than 4-fold the ADA-positive baseline titer (faricimab arm) or the ADA-positive titer prior to first faricimab injection (aflibercept arm).
|
Predose at Day 1 (Baseline), Weeks 4, 24, 28, 52, and 72
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 2, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 9, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
July 12, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 3, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
February 5, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 6, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 10, 2024
Last Verified
July 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Eye Diseases
- Retinal Degeneration
- Retinal Diseases
- Embolism and Thrombosis
- Venous Thrombosis
- Thrombosis
- Macular Degeneration
- Macular Edema
- Retinal Vein Occlusion
- Edema
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors
- Angiogenesis Modulating Agents
- Growth Substances
- Growth Inhibitors
- Aflibercept
- Faricimab
Other Study ID Numbers
- GR41986
- 2020-000441-13 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data.
See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
-
University of TorontoOntario Research FundUnknownCentral Retinal Vein Occlusion | Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion | Central Retinal Artery Occlusion | Branch Retinal Artery OcclusionCanada
-
University of TorontoPfizer; Unity Health Toronto; Canadian Heart Research Centre; Ontario Association... and other collaboratorsUnknownThrombosis | Central Retinal Vein Occlusion | Retinal Vein Occlusion | Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion | Retinal Vein ThrombosisCanada
-
Palo Alto Medical FoundationTerminatedCentral Retinal Vein Occlusion | Branch Retinal Vein OcclusionUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheActive, not recruitingCentral Retinal Vein Occlusion | Diabetic Macular Edema | Retinal Vein Occlusion | Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration | Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion | Hemi-retinal Vein OcclusionSpain, France, United Kingdom, Croatia, Thailand, Israel, Germany, United States, Japan, Switzerland, Singapore, Australia, Taiwan, Poland, Italy, Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Czechia, Puerto Rico, Bulgaria, South Korea, Argentina, Chile, E... and more
-
Anders KvantaCompletedCentral Retinal Vein OcclusionSweden
-
He Eye HospitalUnknownCentral Retinal Vein OcclusionChina
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterUnknownCentral Retinal Vein OcclusionIsrael
-
Ziv HospitalUnknown
-
University of TorontoUnknownCentral Retinal Vein OcclusionCanada
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationUnknownCentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
Clinical Trials on Faricimab
-
Genentech, Inc.RecruitingDiabetic Macular EdemaUnited States
-
Ollin Biosciences, Inc.CompletedDiabetic Macular Edema (DME) | Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular DegenerationUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Osijek University HospitalRecruitingDiabetic Macular Edema (DME) | Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)Croatia
-
Junyeop LeeNot yet recruitingMacular DegenerationSouth Korea
-
Yeungnam University College of MedicineRecruitingAge Related Macular Degeneration | Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV)South Korea
-
Federico II UniversityCompletedDiabetic Retinopathy, DRItaly
-
Bojie HuCompletedProliferative Diabetic RetinopathyChina
-
Kim's Eye HospitalNot yet recruitingChoroidal Neovascularization | Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor | Age-related Macular Degeneration (ARMD)South Korea
-
Biobizkaia Health Research InstituteRoche Farma, S.ARecruitingMacular Degeneration, Age RelatedSpain
-
Singapore National Eye CentreRecruiting