Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost

February 4, 2021 updated by: CHA University

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients : Phase 4, Parallel Group Design, Investigator-blind, Active-control, Randomized, Multi-center Study

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Not provided

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bundang-gu
      • Seongnam, Bundang-gu, Korea, Republic of, 13497
        • CHA University Bundang Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IOP >/= 15mmHg and < 40 mmHg in each eye using Goldmann applanation tonometry at visit 2
  • Written consent voluntarily to participate in this clinical trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with closed-angle, congenital glaucoma or secondary glaucoma caused by steroid drugs, etc.
  • best-corrected visual acuity 20/80 or less
  • Patients who have ongoing medical history of ocular inflammation
  • central corneal thickness is not in between 470um and 591um.
  • Patients who have received lacrimal duct procedure within the last 3 months or who have plans to have it.
  • pregnant or nursing women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Monoprost (preservative-free latanoprost eye drop)
latanoprost : 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes
preservative-free latanoprost 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes
Other Names:
  • Preservative-free latanoprost
Active Comparator: Xalatan (preserved latanoprost eye drop)
latanoprost : 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes
preserved latanoprost 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes
Other Names:
  • Preserved latanoprost

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corneal staining test
Time Frame: (12-week-point)
The degree of staining of the cornea after blue fluorescein staining under the light of cobalt blue using a yellow filter was evaluated according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 5, the higher the worse)
(12-week-point)
Conjunctival staining test
Time Frame: (12-week-point)
The conjunctiva was divided into 6 areas and evaluated after the same staining method according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 3, the higher the worse)
(12-week-point)
Ocular surface disease index (OSDI)
Time Frame: (12-week-point)
The ocular surface was assessed using OSDI scoring questionnaire (0 to 100, the higher the worse)
(12-week-point)
Compliance check
Time Frame: (12-week-point)
Compliance of the drug administration has been check through the subject's self description (0 to 100, the higher the better)
(12-week-point)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corneal staining test
Time Frame: (4-week-point)
The degree of staining of the cornea after blue fluorescein staining under the light of cobalt blue using a yellow filter was evaluated according to the Oxford grading system(0 to 5, the higher the worse)
(4-week-point)
Conjunctival staining test
Time Frame: (4-week-point)
The conjunctiva was divided into 6 areas and evaluated after the same staining method according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 3, the higher the worse)
(4-week-point)
Ocular surface disease indext (OSDI)
Time Frame: (4-week-point)
The ocular surface was assessed using OSDI scoring questionnaire(0 to 100, the higher the worse)
(4-week-point)
IOP (intraocular pressure)
Time Frame: (4- / 12-week-point)
IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. (numerical)
(4- / 12-week-point)
Tear break up time (TBUT)
Time Frame: (4- / 12-week-point)
The time taken from the last blink to the appearance of a black spot on the cornea after fluorescein dye staining. (second, numerical)
(4- / 12-week-point)
Limbal and bulbar hyperemia
Time Frame: (4- / 12-week-point)
The conjunctival hyperemia was assessed using Efron grading scales (0 to 4, the higher the worse)
(4- / 12-week-point)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seungsoo Rho, MD, PhD, CHA Bundang Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MIT 2019-02-020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Monoprost

3
Subscribe