Reducing Fall Risk Post Hip Fracture in Mild Cognitive Impairment

January 17, 2024 updated by: Teresa Liu-Ambrose, University of British Columbia

Reshaping the Path Post Hip Fracture in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Hip fracture is recognized as one of the most serious consequences of osteoporosis, less than half regain pre-fracture independence. 95% of all hip fractures in older adults are due to falls. Thus, reducing fall risk while restoring function post-hip fracture is critical. Many with fall-related hip fractures have cognitive impairment; cognitive impairment increases the risk of falls. The purpose of this 6-month proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the efficacy of the home-based Otago Exercise Program (OEP) compared with usual care in reducing fall risk among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a fall-related hip fracture.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Hip fracture is recognized as one of the most serious consequences of osteoporosis, less than half regain pre-fracture independence. 95% of all hip fractures in older adults are due to falls. Thus, reducing fall risk while restoring function post-hip fracture is critical. Many with fall-related hip fractures have cognitive impairment and they are less likely to regain pre-fracture level of function than those without cognitive impairment. Cognitive impairment also increase falls risk. It is currently unknown whether exercise is efficacious in reducing fall risk and promoting function among older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a fall-related hip fracture. The purpose of this 6-month proof-of-concept RCT is to assess the efficacy of the home-based Otago Exercise Program (OEP) compared with usual care in reducing fall risk among community-dwelling older adults with MCI and a fall-related hip fracture.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • University of British Columbia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: 1) aged 65 or older; 2) sustained a fall-related hip fracture in the last 12 months and have returned home; 3) have preserved general cognition as indicated by a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score = or > 20/30; 4) have subjective memory complaints, determined by interview;22 5) score < 26/30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); 6) have an absence of significant functional impairment and no dementia as determined by a physician; 7) are not expected to start, or are stable (i.e., > 3 months) on a fixed dose of anti-dementia medications (e.g., donepezil, galantamine) during the RCT; 8) are expected to live > 12 months (based on the geriatricians' expert opinion); 9) can read, write, and speak English with acceptable visual and auditory acuity; 10) are able to walk 3 meters with or without an assistive device; and 1) provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria: 1) diagnosed with or suspected to have (by the geriatrician) a neurodegenerative disease (e.g., Parkinson's disease) or dementia; 2) had a clinical stroke; or 3) have a history indicative of carotid sinus sensitivity (i.e., syncopal falls).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Clinical care provided by geriatricians. Each participant will see the geriatrician at baseline and 6 months.
Clinical care provided by a geriatrician.
Experimental: Usual Care with Exercise
Clinical care provided by geriatricians. Each participant will see the geriatrician at baseline and 6 months. In addition, they will receive the Otago Exercise Program, an individualized and home-based program of progressive strength and balance training exercises delivered by a physical therapist.
Clinical care provided by a geriatrician.
An individualized and home-based program of progressive strength and balance training exercises delivered by a physical therapist
Other Names:
  • Exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Physiological Profile Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 Months
A measure of fall risk (z-score).
Baseline to 6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Usual Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Gait speed over 4 meters (m/s).
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Life Space Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Mobility within a life-space level.
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in NIH Cognitive Toolbox
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Cognitive performance of executive functions.
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Digit Symbol Substitute Test
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Cognitive performance of processing speed.
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Mood
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Mood
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Quality of Life
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in ICE-CAP
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Wellbeing
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Physical Activity for the Elderly
Time Frame: Monthly from Baseline to 6 Months
Physical activity over the last 7 days
Monthly from Baseline to 6 Months
Total Number of Prospective Falls
Time Frame: Monthly from Baseline to 6 Months
Self-report of falls using calendars
Monthly from Baseline to 6 Months
Change in Activities Specific Balance Confidence
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Fall-related self efficacy
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Fried Frailty
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
A measure of physical frailty
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Month and 6 Months
A measure of subjective sleep quality
Baseline to 3 Month and 6 Months
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
A measure of balance and mobility (out of 12 points).
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Physiological Profile Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months
A measure of fall risk (z-score); higher z scores indicate higher risk of falls.
Baseline to 3 Months
Change in Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
A measure of functional mobility; greater time for completion indicate poorer performance.
Baseline to 3 Months and 6 Months
Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 Month and 6 Months
A measure of episodic memory; higher scores indicate bettter episodic performance.
Baseline to 3 Month and 6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Teresa Liu-Ambrose, PhD, University of British Columbia
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Guy, MD, University of British Columbia
  • Principal Investigator: Larry Dian, MD, University of British Columbia
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer C Davis, PhD, University of British Columbia
  • Principal Investigator: Deborha Jehu, PhD, University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

3
Subscribe