Efficacy of Hamstring Stretching According to the Neural or Muscle Tissue Involvement

September 2, 2022 updated by: Carlos López de Celis, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Background: Muscle stretching is a technique widely used in the clinical practice of physiotherapy and in the field of sports. In the bibliography we find a multitude of stretches and procedures described, some of them being similar to neurodynamic tests, which could direct their effect to a neural and not a musculoskeletal structure. The structural differentiation manoeuvre has been shown to be able to discriminate the increase in tension on the nerve.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy on ischiosural muscle elongation of three modalities of ischiosural stretching according to neural or muscular involvement, in subjects without previous pathology.

Design: Cross sectional study. Methods: A randomised, blinded, assessor-blinded clinical trial was performed. According to the sample size calculation, a total of 35 subjects will be recruited from the International University of Catalonia. Each subject will undergo three hamstring stretching techniques on their dominant leg, Straight-leg-raise (SLR), Passive knee extension (PKE) and Maximun hip flexion (MHF) with an interval of one week on the dominant leg. Muscle elongation in each stretching modality will be assessed with the modified black saver sit and reach test and whether the technique generates a neural or musculoskeletal response when performing the structural differentiation manoeuvre.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Muscle stretching is a technique widely used in the clinical practice of physiotherapy and in the field of sports. In the bibliography we find a multitude of stretches and procedures described, some of them being similar to neurodynamic tests, which could direct their effect to a neural and not a musculoskeletal structure. The structural differentiation manoeuvre has been shown to be able to discriminate the increase in tension on the nerve.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy on ischiosural muscle elongation of three modalities of ischiosural stretching according to neural or muscular involvement, in subjects without previous pathology.

Design: Cross sectional study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Sant Cugat Del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain, 08195
        • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects over 18 years old who signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) injury in the thigh 6 months previously, 2) diagnosis of any orthopaedic problem or surgery in the lower limbs, 3) back pain or previous surgery in the spine or 4) systemic or neurological disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dominant
All subjects will receive the three stretching techniques on dominant leg. Interventions will be performed in three different days and only one of the three stretching exercises will be performed in each session. The rest period between sessions will be one week. Stretching exercises will be perform in a random order. A random-number generator will be used for randomization
The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the SLR, the knee was kept in full extension and then, hip flexion was performed until a marked resistance. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.The stretch lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the PKE, the hip was kept in 90º flexion and then, knee extension was performed. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For MHF, a maximal hip flexion was performed and then, knee extension was applied. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Active Comparator: Non dominant
All subjects will receive the three stretching techniques on non dominant leg. Interventions will be performed in three different days and only one of the three stretching exercises will be performed in each session. The rest period between sessions will bé one week. Stretching exercises will be perform in a random order. A random-number generator will bé used for randomization
The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the SLR, the knee was kept in full extension and then, hip flexion was performed until a marked resistance. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.The stretch lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the PKE, the hip was kept in 90º flexion and then, knee extension was performed. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For MHF, a maximal hip flexion was performed and then, knee extension was applied. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified back-saver sit-and-reach test
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.
subjects will perform a single-leg sit-and-reach on a bench. The untested leg will be placed on the floor with knee at approximately 90º. A measuring tape will be placed on the bench. Subjects aligned the sole of the foot of the tested leg with the 50-cm mark on the measuring tape. Thereafter, subjects will be asked to reach forward as far as possible while maintaining the knees, arms, and fingers fully extended, and keep in the two hands on tip of each other and palms down
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.
Distal sensation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.
Passive ankle dorsiflexion was performed as distal sensation manoeuvre at the final position of all stretching modalities. Subjects were asked to indicate if the sensation during the stretching was modified during the ankle dorsiflexion (neural response) or was the same (musculoskeletal response)
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.
Force intensity applyed
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.
The intensity of the force applied during each stretching modality was measured by a manual dynamometer (MicroFET2, Hoggan Scientific, Salt Lake City, Utah). The dynamometer was applied on the distal leg, proximal to the ankle joint. The physiotherapist performed the stretching until a marked resistance was felt and then, the force was registered.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived sensation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.
After the stretching application, all subjects were asked about their perceived sensation. They were asked about the intensity of the tension sensation during the technique. A numeric scale, ranging from 0 ("no tension") to 10 ("worst tension imaginable") was used to indicate the intensity of tension sensation during the stretching technique.
Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlos L López de Celis, Dr, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Stretching

Clinical Trials on Straight-leg-raise (SLR)

Subscribe