Pediatric Liver Fat Quantification (LFQ) Phase 2 Pilot Study

January 23, 2026 updated by: Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global

Pilot Study of On-Cart Liver Fat Quantification (LFQ) Feature to Assess Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) Results in a Pediatric Population

This clinical study will involve performing a series of medical imaging procedures of the abdomen using both ultrasound and MRI modalities in subjects at risk for or already diagnosed with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). The primary objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the clinical feasibility of an investigational ultrasound technique for quantifying liver fat by comparing specific ultrasound-derived biomarkers with the liver fat percentage obtained from MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) measurements. All subjects enrolled in this study will undergo one investigational abdominal ultrasound examination using the Philips EPIQ Ultrasound System and one MRI PDFF examination according to the clinical standard of care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
        • Phoenix Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 21 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects at least 5 years old up through and including 21 years old who are able to provide informed consent to participate or have a legal representative/parent/legal guardian who is able to provide informed consent for the subject to participate.
  • Subjects must be eligible for a standard abdominal ultrasound examination and standard non-contrast MRI examination.

In addition, at least one of the following criteria must also be met:

  • Overweight or obese (BMI-for-age ≥ 85th percentile).
  • Diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes per standard clinical guidelines.
  • Diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia per standard clinical guidelines.
  • Diagnosed with or clinically suspected of having NAFLD/NASH based on previous medical record, medical imaging, liver biopsy, and/or laboratory testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of moderate/heavy/binge alcohol consumption exceeding NIAAA guidelines.
  • Evidence of hepatotoxicity or cirrhosis in the clinical judgment of the investigator.
  • History of chronic liver disease other than NAFLD (e.g., viral, cholestatic, or autoimmune).
  • Use of drugs associated with hepatic steatosis:

    • Amiodarone
    • Methotrexate
    • Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (didanosine, stavudine)
    • Valproic acid
    • Dexamethasone
    • Tamoxifen
    • 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy
    • Apo-B inhibitors (mipomersen, lomitapide)
    • Tetracycline exceeding 2 g/day
    • Acetylsalicylic acid exceeding 150 mg/kg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Investigational Ultrasound Imaging for Liver Fat Quantification
All subjects enrolled in this study will undergo two abdominal ultrasound examinations using the investigational Liver Fat Quantification feature on the Philips EPIQ Ultrasound System. In addition, all subjects will also undergo one MRI-PDFF examination according to the clinical standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of the Liver Fat Percentage Reported From MRI-PDFF With Measurements of Acoustic Attenuation (dB/cm/MHZ) Ultrasound Biomarker for Liver Fat.
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)

For each biomarker per subject, multiple quantitative measurements were acquired on the same day by two different operators. To assess the correlation between subject averaged measurements derived from the investigational LFQ feature and the 'clinical' MRI-PDFF fat fraction obtained from the subject's medical record.

Correlation of each ultrasound biomarker with the liver fat percentage reported from MRI-PDFF is assessed independently to evaluate individual biomarker performance. A higher attenuation value indicates worse liver condition, while a lower attenuation value suggests better liver status.

Intra-procedural (1 day)
Correlation of the Liver Fat Percentage Reported From MRI-PDFF With Measurements of Hepatorenal Index (HRI) Ultrasound Biomarker for Liver Fat.
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)
For each biomarker per subject, multiple quantitative measurements were acquired on the same day by two different operators. The difference between the two operators was calculated at the subject level by averaging multiple measurements. To assess the correlation between measurements derived from the investigational LFQ feature and the 'clinical' MRI-PDFF fat fraction obtained from the subject's medical record. A higher HRI value indicates greater liver fat accumulation, which reflects a worse outcome, while a lower HRI suggests less hepatic fat and a better outcome.
Intra-procedural (1 day)
Correlation of the Liver Fat Percentage Reported From MRI-PDFF With Measurements of Tissue Stiffness (kPa) Ultrasound Biomarkers for Liver Fat.
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)

For each biomarker per subject, multiple quantitative measurements were acquired on the same day by two different operators. To assess the correlation between subject averaged measurements derived from the investigational LFQ feature and the 'clinical' MRI-PDFF fat fraction obtained from the subject's medical record. This measured the MRI PDFF fat fraction used as the standard to evaluate the Tissue stiffness (kPa) measurements.

Correlation of each ultrasound biomarker with the liver fat percentage reported from MRI-PDFF is assessed independently to evaluate individual biomarker performance.

Correlation of each ultrasound biomarker with the liver fat percentage reported from MRI-PDFF will be assessed independently to evaluate individual biomarker performance.

Intra-procedural (1 day)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Evaluate the Same-day Inter-operator Variability for Investigating Biomarker "Hepatorenal Index (HRI)"
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)
To assess the difference in quantitative ultrasound biomarker measurements which acquired from the same subject on the same day by two different operators who have undergone standardized training for LFQ data acquisition. The difference between the two operators was calculated at the subject level by averaging multiple measurements. A higher HRI value indicates greater liver fat accumulation, which reflects a worse outcome, while a lower HRI suggests less hepatic fat and a better outcome.
Intra-procedural (1 day)
To Evaluate the LFQ Data Acquisition Failure Rate for Investigating Biomarker "Hepatorenal Index (HRI)"
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)
To evaluate the LFQ data acquisition failure rate, the proportion of subjects who have at least one unacceptable image quality due to inadequate acoustic scanning windows, motion artifacts, or other technical limitations
Intra-procedural (1 day)
To Evaluate the LFQ Data Acquisition Failure Rate for Investigating Biomarker Acoustic Attenuation (dB/cm/MHZ)
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)
To evaluate the LFQ data acquisition failure rate, the proportion of subjects who have at least one unacceptable image quality due to inadequate acoustic scanning windows, motion artifacts, or other technical limitations
Intra-procedural (1 day)
To Evaluate the LFQ Data Acquisition Failure Rate for Investigating Biomarker Tissue Stiffness (kPa)
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)
To evaluate the LFQ data acquisition failure rate, the proportion of subjects who have at least one unacceptable image quality due to inadequate acoustic scanning windows, motion artifacts, or other technical limitations
Intra-procedural (1 day)
To Evaluate the Same-day Inter-operator Variability for Investigating Biomarker Acoustic Attenuation (dB/cm/MHZ)
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)

To assess the difference in quantitative ultrasound biomarker measurements which acquired from the same subject on the same day by two different operators who have undergone standardized training for LFQ data acquisition.

The difference between the two operators was calculated at the subject level by averaging multiple measurements.

Intra-procedural (1 day)
To Evaluate the Same-day Inter-operator Variability for Investigating Biomarker Tissue Stiffness (kPa)
Time Frame: Intra-procedural (1 day)

To assess the difference in quantitative ultrasound biomarker measurements which acquired from the same subject on the same day by two different operators who have undergone standardized training for LFQ data acquisition.

The difference between the two operators was calculated at the subject level by averaging multiple measurements.

Intra-procedural (1 day)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Smita S Bailey, MD, Phoenix Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Clinical Trials on Investigational Liver Fat Quantification Software

Subscribe