Phase 2 Study Of VLA15, A Vaccine Candidate Against Lyme Borreliosis, In A Healthy Pediatric And Adult Study Population

March 19, 2024 updated by: Pfizer

SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY STUDY OF VLA15, A MULTIVALENT RECOMBINANT OSPA BASED VACCINE CANDIDATE AGAINST LYME BORRELIOSIS: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED, OBSERVER-BLIND PHASE 2 STUDY IN A HEALTHY PEDIATRIC AND ADULT STUDY POPULATION

VLA15-221 is a Phase 2 study, which will be conducted in two parts: Main Study Phase (Part A) and Booster Phase (Part B). The study will compare the safety and immunogenicity of two different primary immunization schedules applying three (Month 0-2-6) or two (Month 0- 6) vaccinations. Within the study, 600 healthy subjects aged 5-65 years will be included. Subjects with a history of Lyme borreliosis (previous infection with Borrelia) as well as Borrelia naïve subjects will be enrolled. Study duration per subject will be a maximum of 56 months per subject.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

VLA15-221 is a randomized, observer-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter Phase 2 study, which is set up in two parts: Main Study Phase (Part A) and Booster Phase (Part B). In Part A 600 subjects aged 5-65 years will be enrolled 1:1:1 into three groups: Group 1 will be vaccinated with VLA15 at Month 0-2-6, Group 2 will be vaccinated with VLA15 at Month 0-6 and with placebo at Month 2 and Group 3 will be vaccinated with placebo at Month 0-2-6. In Part B all eligible subjects will receive a booster injection with VLA15 or placebo at Month 18 and 30.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

625

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States, 06606
        • New England Research Associates
      • Stamford, Connecticut, United States, 06905
        • Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
        • Chase Medical Research, LLC
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
        • Pediatric Associates of Conn. PC
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55402
        • Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
    • New Jersey
      • East Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07018
        • Foundation Pediatrics
      • Irvington, New Jersey, United States, 07111
        • Med Clinical Research Partners, LLC
    • New York
      • Binghamton, New York, United States, 13901
        • Meridian Clinical Research LLC
      • Binghamton, New York, United States, 13905
        • Meridian Clinical Research LLC
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10468
        • Advantage Clinical Trials
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Advantage Clinical Trials
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
        • Rochester Clinical Research, Inc.
      • Staten Island, New York, United States, 10312
        • Richmond Behavioral Associates
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • Velocity Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Pennsylvania
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16506
        • Allegheny Health and Wellness Pavilion
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16508
        • Liberty Family Practice
      • Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, United States, 19034
        • Lockman & Lubell Pediatric Associates
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
        • The Miriam Hospital
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Hasbro Children's Hospital
      • Warwick, Rhode Island, United States, 02886
        • Velocity Clinical Research Providence

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is aged 5 to 65 years at the day of screening (Visit 0)
  • Subject is of good general health
  • Parent(s)/legal representative(s) and subject understand the study and its procedures, agree to its provisions

    • for subjects aged 18-65 years: written informed consent prior to any study related procedures
    • for subjects aged 5-17 years: written informed consent by the subject's legal representative(s), according to local requirements, and written informed assent of the subject, if applicable, prior to any study related procedures.
  • If subject is of childbearing potential: Subject has a negative serum pregnancy test at screening (Visit 0) and agrees to employ adequate birth control measures according to following timelines:

    • Main Study Phase: duration of entire study
    • Booster Phase: until 5 months after first booster (i.e Month 23) and second booster (i.e. Month 35)
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, and other study procedures
  • Subject is available for the duration of the study and can be contacted by telephone during study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a chronic illness related to Lyme borreliosis (LB), an active symptomatic LB, or received treatment for LB within the last 3 months prior to Day 1;
  • Subject received previous vaccination against LB;
  • Subject had a tick bite within 4 weeks prior to Day 1;
  • Subject has a medical history of or currently has a clinically relevant disease;
  • Subject has a medical history of or currently has a neuro- inflammatory or autoimmune disease;
  • Subject has a known thrombocytopenia, bleeding disorder, or received anticoagulants in the 3 weeks prior to Day 1;
  • Subject has received an active or passive immunization within 4 weeks prior to Day 1;
  • Subject has received any other registered or non-registered medicinal product in another clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to vaccination at Day 1;
  • Subject has a known or suspected defect of the immune system or received immuno-suppressive therapy within 4 weeks prior to Day 1;
  • Subject has a history of anaphylaxis of unknown cause or severe allergic reactions of unknown cause or has a known hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to one of the components of the vaccine;
  • Subject had any malignancy in the past 5 years;
  • Subject is pregnant, has plans to become pregnant during the course of the study or is lactating at the time of enrollment;
  • Subject has donated or plans to donate blood or blood-derived products 4 weeks prior to Day 1;
  • Subject has any condition that may compromise its well-being, might interfere with evaluation of study endpoints, or would limit the subject's ability to complete the study;
  • Subject is in a dependent relationship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Part A+B - Group 1
Part A: VLA15 at Month 0, 2 and 6 Part B: VLA15 at Month 18 and 30
a multivalent recombinant Outer Surface Protein A (OspA) based vaccine candidate
Experimental: Part A+B - Group 2
Part A: VLA15 at Month 0 and 6, placebo at Month 2 Part B: VLA15 at Month 18 and 30
a multivalent recombinant Outer Surface Protein A (OspA) based vaccine candidate
PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline)
Placebo Comparator: Part A+B - Group 3
Part A: Placebo at Month 0, 2 and 6 Part B: Placebo at Month 18 and 30
PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) Within 7 Days After Vaccination 1
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 1 at Month 0
Participants or their legal guardians were required to record any solicited local and systemic adverse events in the electronic diary. Solicited symptoms were pre-defined symptoms which were collected via an electronic diary. Solicited local AEs included pain, tenderness, erythema (redness), swelling and induration (hardening). Solicited systemic AEs included headache, muscle pain, joint pain, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and fever. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 1 at Month 0
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Solicited Systemic AEs Within 7 Days After Vaccination 2
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 2 at Month 2
Participants or their legal guardians were required to record any solicited local and systemic adverse events in the electronic diary. Solicited symptoms were pre-defined symptoms which were collected via an electronic diary. Solicited local AEs included pain, tenderness, erythema (redness), swelling and induration (hardening). Solicited systemic AEs included headache, muscle pain, joint pain, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and fever. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 2 at Month 2
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Solicited Systemic AEs Within 7 Days After Vaccination 3
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 3 at Month 6
Participants or their legal guardians were required to record any solicited local and systemic adverse events in the electronic diary. Solicited symptoms were pre-defined symptoms which were collected via an electronic diary. Solicited local AEs included pain, tenderness, erythema (redness), swelling and induration (hardening). Solicited systemic AEs included headache, muscle pain, joint pain, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and fever. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 3 at Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Solicited Systemic AEs Within 7 Days After Any Vaccination During the Main Study Phase
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 1, 2 or 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6 respectively
Participants or their legal guardians were required to record any solicited local and systemic adverse events in the electronic diary. Solicited symptoms were pre-defined symptoms which were collected via an electronic diary. Solicited local AEs included pain, tenderness, erythema (redness), swelling and induration (hardening). Solicited systemic AEs included headache, muscle pain, joint pain, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and fever. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
From Day 1 to Day 7 after vaccination 1, 2 or 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6 respectively
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) for Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Against Each Outer Surface Protein A (OspA) Serotype (ST1 to ST6) at Day 208 During the Main Study Phase
Time Frame: Day 208 (Month 7)
GMTs for IgG against each OspA serotype ST1 to ST6, determined by an IgG binding assay at Day 208 is presented in this outcome measure.
Day 208 (Month 7)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Solicited Systemic AEs Within 7 Days After Booster Dose
Time Frame: Within 7 days after booster dose
Participants or their legal guardians were required to record any solicited local and systemic adverse events in the electronic diary. Solicited local AEs included pain, tenderness, erythema (redness), swelling and induration (hardening). Solicited systemic AEs included headache, muscle pain, joint pain, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and fever.
Within 7 days after booster dose
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Day 1 of vaccination up to Day 208 (Month 7)
SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was another medically important condition. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
From Day 1 of vaccination up to Day 208 (Month 7)
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: From Day 1 of vaccination up to Day 208 (Month 7)
An AESI (serious or non-serious) was one of scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the sponsor were appropriate. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
From Day 1 of vaccination up to Day 208 (Month 7)
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Day 28 after vaccination 1, 2 and 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6, respectively
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an investigational product, whether or not related to this treatment. Unsolicited AEs were defined as any solicited local or systemic AE if it had an onset date more than 6 days after vaccination or any other symptom or untoward medical event. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
From Day 1 to Day 28 after vaccination 1, 2 and 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6, respectively
Percentage of Participants With SAEs, AESIs, Solicited and Unsolicited AEs Stratified by Age Group
Time Frame: SAEs, AESIs: From Day 1 of vaccination (vac) up to Day 208 (Month 7), Solicited AEs: From Day 1 to Day 7 after vac 1, 2 and 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6, respectively; Unsolicited AEs: From Day 1 to Day 28 after vac 1, 2 and 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6, respectively
Percentage of participants with SAEs, AESIs, solicited and unsolicited AEs stratified by age group 18 to 65, 12 to 17 and 5 to 11 years were reported. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; was life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was another medically important condition. AESI: scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor's product or program. Solicited AE: predefined reactions at injection site or systemic reactions after each vaccination. Unsolicited AEs: any solicited local or systemic AE if it had an onset date more than 6 days after vaccination or any other symptom or untoward medical event. Unsolicited AEs were collected only up to 28 days after any vaccination. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated according to Altman method.
SAEs, AESIs: From Day 1 of vaccination (vac) up to Day 208 (Month 7), Solicited AEs: From Day 1 to Day 7 after vac 1, 2 and 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6, respectively; Unsolicited AEs: From Day 1 to Day 28 after vac 1, 2 and 3 at Month 0, 2 and 6, respectively
GMTs for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) at Baseline, Day 85, Day 180 and Day 194 During the Main Study Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 85, Day 180 and Day 194
GMTs for IgG against each OspA serotype ST1 to ST6, determined by an IgG binding assay.
Baseline, Day 85, Day 180 and Day 194
Seroconversion Rate for Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) Specific IgG at Day 85, 180, 194 and 208
Time Frame: Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 and Day 208
Seroconversion Rate (SCR) for each OspA serotype specific IgG ST1 to ST6, determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Seroconversion for ELISA was defined as: 1) For participants who were seronegative at screening: percentage of participants with a change from seronegative at screening to seropositive (i.e. antibody titer of >=40 Units per milliliter [U/mL]) at a certain time point. 2) For participants who were seropositive at screening: percentage of participants with a >= 4-fold rise in OspA IgG antibody titer from screening.
Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 and Day 208
Geometric Mean of the Fold Rise (GMFR) for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) at Day 85 and Day 208 During the Main Study Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 85 and 208
GMFR as compared to baseline for IgG against each OspA serotype ST1 to ST6, determined by IgG binding assay at Day 85 and Day 208.
Baseline, Day 85 and 208
GMTs for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) Stratified by Age Group at Baseline, Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 and Day 208 During the Main Study Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 (18 to 65 years only) and Day 208
GMTs for IgG against each OspA serotype ST1 to ST6, determined by an IgG binding assay stratified by age group (18 to 65, 12 to 17 and 5 to 11 years).
Baseline, Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 (18 to 65 years only) and Day 208
Seroconversion Rate for Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) Specific IgG at Day 85, 180, 194 and 208 Stratified by Age Group During the Main Study Phase
Time Frame: Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 (18 to 65 years only) and Day 208
SCR for each OspA serotype specific IgG ST1 to ST6, determined by ELISA stratified by age group (18 to 65, 12 to 17 and 5 to 11 years). Seroconversion for ELISA was defined as: 1) For participants who were seronegative at screening: percentage of participants with a change from seronegative at screening to seropositive (i.e. antibody titer of >=40 Units per milliliter [U/mL]) at a certain time point. 2) For participants who were seropositive at screening: percentage of participants with a >= 4-fold rise in OspA IgG antibody titer from screening.
Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 (18 to 65 years only) and Day 208
Geometric Mean of the Fold Rise (GMFR) for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) at Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 and Day 208 Stratified by Age Group During the Main Study Phase
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 (18 to 65 years only) and Day 208
GMFR as compared to baseline for IgG against each OspA serotype ST1 to ST6, stratified by age group (18 to 65, 12 to 17 and 5 to 11 years) determined by IgG binding assay at Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 (18 to 65 years only) and Day 208.
Baseline, Day 85, Day 180, Day 194 (18 to 65 years only) and Day 208
GMTs for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) During the Booster Phase
Time Frame: Up to Month 54
Up to Month 54
SCR for Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) IgG During the Booster Phase
Time Frame: Up to Month 54
Seroconversion for ELISA was defined as: 1) For participants who were seronegative at screening: a change from seronegative at screening to seropositive (i.e. antibody titer of >=40 U/mL) at a certain time point. 2) For participants who were seropositive at screening: a >= 4-fold rise in OspA IgG antibody titer from screening.
Up to Month 54
GMFR for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) at Month 19 During the Booster Phase
Time Frame: Month 19
Month 19
GMTs for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) Stratified by Age Cohort During the Booster Phase
Time Frame: Up to Month 54
Up to Month 54
SCR for Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) IgG Stratified by Age Cohort During the Booster Phase
Time Frame: Up to Month 54
Seroconversion for ELISA was defined as: 1) For participants who were seronegative at screening: a change from seronegative at screening to seropositive (i.e. antibody titer of >=40 U/mL) at a certain time point. 2) For participants who were seropositive at screening: a >= 4-fold rise in OspA IgG antibody titer from screening.
Up to Month 54
GMFR for IgG Against Each OspA Serotype (ST1 to ST6) Stratified by Age Cohort During the Booster Phase
Time Frame: Up to Month 54
Up to Month 54

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 22, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lyme Borreliosis

Clinical Trials on VLA15

3
Subscribe